Mark A Ahlman1, Paul J Nietert2, Amy E Wahlquist2, Jill M Serguson3, Max W Berry3, Pal Suranyi3, Songtao Liu1, Kenneth M Spicer3. 1. Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Bethesda, MD, USA. 2. Department of Medicine, Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Medical University of South Carolina Charleston, SC, USA. 3. Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina Charleston, SC, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: In the effort to reduce radiation exposure to patients undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) with SPECT/CT, we evaluate the feasibility of a single CT for attenuation correction (AC) of single-day rest (R)/stress (S) perfusion. METHODS: Processing of 20 single isotope and 20 dual isotope MPI with perfusion defects were retrospectively repeated in three steps: (1) the standard method using a concurrent R-CT for AC of R-SPECT and S-CT for S-SPECT; (2) the standard method repeated; and (3) with the R-CT used for AC of S-SPECT, and the S-CT used for AC of R-SPECT. Intra-Class Correlation Coefficients (ICC) and Choen's kappa were used to measure intra-operator variability in sum scoring. RESULTS: The highest level of intra-operator reliability was seen with the reproduction of the sum rest score (SRS) and sum stress score (SSS) (ICC > 95%). ICCs were > 85% for SRS and SSS when alternate CTs were used for AC, but when sum difference scores were calculated, ICC values were much lower (~22% to 27%), which may imply that neither CT substitution resulted in a reproducible difference score. Similar results were seen when evaluating dichotomous outcomes (sum scores difference of ≥ 4) when comparing different processing techniques (kappas ~0.32 to 0.43). CONCLUSIONS: When a single CT is used for AC of both rest and stress SPECT, there is disproportionately high variability in sum scoring that is independent of user error. This information can be used to direct further investigation in radiation reduction for common imaging exams in nuclear medicine.
PURPOSE: In the effort to reduce radiation exposure to patients undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) with SPECT/CT, we evaluate the feasibility of a single CT for attenuation correction (AC) of single-day rest (R)/stress (S) perfusion. METHODS: Processing of 20 single isotope and 20 dual isotope MPI with perfusion defects were retrospectively repeated in three steps: (1) the standard method using a concurrent R-CT for AC of R-SPECT and S-CT for S-SPECT; (2) the standard method repeated; and (3) with the R-CT used for AC of S-SPECT, and the S-CT used for AC of R-SPECT. Intra-Class Correlation Coefficients (ICC) and Choen's kappa were used to measure intra-operator variability in sum scoring. RESULTS: The highest level of intra-operator reliability was seen with the reproduction of the sum rest score (SRS) and sum stress score (SSS) (ICC > 95%). ICCs were > 85% for SRS and SSS when alternate CTs were used for AC, but when sum difference scores were calculated, ICC values were much lower (~22% to 27%), which may imply that neither CT substitution resulted in a reproducible difference score. Similar results were seen when evaluating dichotomous outcomes (sum scores difference of ≥ 4) when comparing different processing techniques (kappas ~0.32 to 0.43). CONCLUSIONS: When a single CT is used for AC of both rest and stress SPECT, there is disproportionately high variability in sum scoring that is independent of user error. This information can be used to direct further investigation in radiation reduction for common imaging exams in nuclear medicine.
Authors: Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-01-29 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: H William Strauss; D Douglas Miller; Mark D Wittry; Manuel D Cerqueira; Ernest V Garcia; Abdulmassi S Iskandrian; Heinrich R Schelbert; Frans J Wackers; Helena R Balon; Otto Lang; Josef Machac Journal: J Nucl Med Technol Date: 2008-08-14
Authors: Rory Hachamovitch; Alan Rozanski; Sean W Hayes; Louise E J Thomson; Guido Germano; John D Friedman; Ishac Cohen; Daniel S Berman Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: T Sharir; G Germano; X Kang; H C Lewin; R Miranda; I Cohen; R D Agafitei; J D Friedman; D S Berman Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Diwakar Jain; Harry Lessig; Riti Patel; Leonard Sandler; Fred Weiland; Steven L Edell; M Elizabeth Oates; Erin O'Malley-Tysko; Natalie Khutoryansky; Arnold F Jacobson Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2009-04-24 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Mouaz H Al-Mallah; Timothy M Bateman; Kelley R Branch; Andrew Crean; Eric L Gingold; Randall C Thompson; Sarah E McKenney; Edward J Miller; Venkatesh L Murthy; Koen Nieman; Todd C Villines; Michael V Yester; Andrew J Einstein; John J Mahmarian Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2022-09-02 Impact factor: 3.872