Literature DB >> 17386377

Attenuation artifact, attenuation correction, and the future of myocardial perfusion SPECT.

Bhupinder Singh, Timothy M Bateman, James A Case, Gary Heller.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17386377     DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2007.01.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   3.872


× No keyword cloud information.
  50 in total

1.  Attenuation correction of myocardial SPECT images with X-ray CT: effects of registration errors between X-ray CT and SPECT.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Takahashi; Kenya Murase; Hiroshi Higashino; Teruhito Mochizuki; Nobutoku Motomura
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.668

2.  Object-specific attenuation correction at SPECT/CT in thorax: optimization of respiratory protocol for image registration.

Authors:  Daisuke Utsunomiya; Takeshi Nakaura; Tsuyoshi Honda; Shinya Shiraishi; Seiji Tomiguchi; Koichi Kawanaka; Shoji Morishita; Kazuo Awai; Hisao Ogawa; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Quantitative stress-redistribution thallium-201 SPECT using prone imaging: methodologic development and validation.

Authors:  H Kiat; K F Van Train; J D Friedman; G Germano; G Silagan; F P Wang; J Maddahi; F Prigent; D S Berman
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Attenuation correction in cardiac SPECT: the boy who cried wolf?

Authors:  Guido Germano; Piotr J Slomka; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 5.  Attenuation compensation for cardiac single-photon emission computed tomographic imaging: Part 1. Impact of attenuation and methods of estimating attenuation maps.

Authors:  M A King; B M Tsui; T S Pan
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  The comparable diagnostic accuracies of dobutamine-stress and dipyridamole-stress echocardiographies: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  E Picano; G Bedetti; A Varga; E Cseh
Journal:  Coron Artery Dis       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.439

7.  Attenuation correction of myocardial SPECT perfusion images with low-dose CT: evaluation of the method by comparison with perfusion PET.

Authors:  Eva Fricke; Harald Fricke; Reiner Weise; Annett Kammeier; Ralph Hagedorn; Norbert Lotz; Oliver Lindner; Diethelm Tschoepe; Wolfgang Burchert
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Low event rate for stress-only perfusion imaging in patients evaluated for chest pain.

Authors:  Peter B Gibson; Diane Demus; Richard Noto; William Hudson; Lynne L Johnson
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-03-20       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  The prognostic value of ECG-gated SPECT imaging in patients undergoing stress Tc-99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Mark I Travin; Gary V Heller; Lynne L Johnson; Deborah Katten; Alan W Ahlberg; Carmen R Isasi; Robert C Kaplan; Cynthia C Taub; Diane Demus
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Adenosine combined with dynamic exercise for myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  D J Pennell; S I Mavrogeni; S M Forbat; S P Karwatowski; S R Underwood
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  25 in total

1.  Direct Image-Based Attenuation Correction using Conditional Generative Adversarial Network for SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging.

Authors:  Mahsa Torkaman; Jaewon Yang; Luyao Shi; Rui Wang; Edward J Miller; Albert J Sinusas; Chi Liu; Grant T Gullberg; Youngho Seo
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2021-02-15

2.  Can we enhance quality in nuclear cardiology?

Authors:  George A Beller
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Sources of attenuation-correction artefacts in cardiac PET/CT and SPECT/CT.

Authors:  Sarah J McQuaid; Brian F Hutton
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-01-25       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Improved quantification in single-pinhole and multiple-pinhole SPECT using micro-CT information.

Authors:  Christian Vanhove; Michel Defrise; Axel Bossuyt; Tony Lahoutte
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Automated assessment of serial SPECT myocardial perfusion images.

Authors:  Ami E Iskandrian; Ernest V Garcia; Tracy Faber; John J Mahmarian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Validation of attenuation correction using transmission truncation compensation with a small field of view dedicated cardiac SPECT camera system.

Authors:  Gavin L Noble; Alan W Ahlberg; Aravind Rao Kokkirala; S James Cullom; Timothy M Bateman; Giselle M Cyr; Deborah M Katten; Glenn D Tadeo; James A Case; David M O'Sullivan; Gary V Heller
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Nuclear cardiology in the present and beyond: can we meet the challenges?

Authors:  Gary V Heller
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Prevalence of noncardiac findings on low dose 64-slice computed tomography used for attenuation correction in myocardial perfusion imaging with SPECT.

Authors:  Lars Husmann; Fuminari Tatsugami; Ursina Aepli; Bernhard A Herzog; Ines Valenta; Patrick Veit-Haibach; Ronny R Buechel; Aju P Pazhenkottil; Oliver Gaemperli; Nina Burkhard; Christophe A Wyss; Philipp A Kaufmann
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  Stress-only myocardial perfusion imaging … it is time for a change!

Authors:  Sanjeev P Bhavnani; Gary V Heller
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Stress first myocardial perfusion imaging: is it time to put to rest the "rest first" strategy for most patients?

Authors:  Karthik Ananthasubramaniam; Sabha Bhatti
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-09-15       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.