Literature DB >> 24470257

Different methods for reproducing time, different results.

Giovanna Mioni1, Franca Stablum, Shawn M McClintock, Simon Grondin.   

Abstract

One of the most widely used tasks for investigating psychological time, time reproduction, requires from participants the reproduction of the duration of a previously presented stimulus. Although prior studies have investigated the effects of different cognitive processes on time reproduction performance, no studies have looked into the effects of different reproduction methods on these performances. In the present study, participants were randomly assigned to one of three reproduction methods, which included (a) just pressing at the end of the interval, (b) pressing to start and stop the interval, and (c) maintaining continuous pressing during the interval. The study revealed that the three reproduction methods were not equivalent, with the method involving keypresses to start and stop the reproduction showing the highest accuracy, and the method of continuous press generating less variability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24470257      PMCID: PMC4108993          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-014-0625-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  16 in total

1.  Comparison is not just subtraction: effects of time- and space-order on subjective stimulus difference.

Authors:  Ake Hellström
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-10

2.  The influence of affective factors on time perception.

Authors:  A Angrilli; P Cherubini; A Pavese; S Mantredini
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1997-08

3.  Reaction time after head injury: fatigue, divided and focused attention, and consistency of performance.

Authors:  D T Stuss; L L Stethem; H Hugenholtz; T Picton; J Pivik; M T Richard
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  Duration processing after frontal lobe lesions.

Authors:  P Nichelli; K Clark; C Hollnagel; J Grafman
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1995-12-15       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Contrasting task demands alter the perceived duration of brief time intervals.

Authors:  T F Sawyer; P J Meyers; S J Huser
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-12

6.  Attentional resources in timing: interference effects in concurrent temporal and nontemporal working memory tasks.

Authors:  S W Brown
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1997-10

7.  Temporal discrimination and the indifference interval. Implications for a model of the "internal clock".

Authors:  M Treisman
Journal:  Psychol Monogr       Date:  1963

8.  Neuropharmacological evidence for different timing mechanisms in humans.

Authors:  T H Rammsayer
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  1999-08

9.  Reaction times and attention in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  C A Bloxham; D J Dick; M Moore
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 10.154

10.  Divided attention 5 to 10 years after severe closed head injury.

Authors:  W H Brouwer; R W Ponds; P C Van Wolffelaar; A H Van Zomeren
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 4.027

View more
  16 in total

1.  Faster is briefer: The symbolic meaning of speed influences time perception.

Authors:  Giovanna Mioni; Dan Zakay; Simon Grondin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-10

2.  The role of low-frequency rTMS in the superior parietal cortex during time estimation.

Authors:  Fernanda Manaia; Kaline Rocha; Victor Marinho; Francisco Magalhães; Thomaz Oliveira; Valécia Carvalho; Thalys Araújo; Carla Ayres; Daya Gupta; Bruna Velasques; Pedro Ribeiro; Mauricio Cagy; Victor Hugo Bastos; Silmar Teixeira
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 3.307

3.  The influence of social stress on time perception and psychophysiological reactivity.

Authors:  Kathryne van Hedger; Elizabeth A Necka; Anam K Barakzai; Greg J Norman
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Field dependence-independence differently affects retrospective time estimation and flicker-induced time dilation.

Authors:  Alice Teghil; Maddalena Boccia; Cecilia Guariglia
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Training the brain to time: the effect of neurofeedback of SMR-Beta1 rhythm on time perception in healthy adults.

Authors:  Behnoush Behzadifard; Saied Sabaghypour; Farhad Farkhondeh Tale Navi; Mohammad Ali Nazari
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 2.064

6.  Does time ever fly or slow down? The difficult interpretation of psychophysical data on time perception.

Authors:  Miguel A García-Pérez
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Subjective time compression induced by continuous action.

Authors:  Sayako Ueda; Shingo Shimoda
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Interval discrimination across different duration ranges with a look at spatial compatibility and context effects.

Authors:  Giovanna Mioni; Franca Stablum; Simon Grondin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-08

Review 9.  Temporal dysfunction in traumatic brain injury patients: primary or secondary impairment?

Authors:  Giovanna Mioni; Simon Grondin; Franca Stablum
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Visual Timing of Structured Dance Movements Resembles Auditory Rhythm Perception.

Authors:  Yi-Huang Su; Elvira Salazar-López
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 3.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.