Literature DB >> 14674641

Comparison is not just subtraction: effects of time- and space-order on subjective stimulus difference.

Ake Hellström1.   

Abstract

In five experiments, participants made comparative judgments of paired successive or simultaneous stimuli. Time- or space-order errors were obtained, which varied with the interstimulus interval (ISI) or stimulus duration, as well as with the stimulus level. The results, in terms of scaled subjective differences, are well described by Hellström's (1979) sensation-weighting model. With successive presentation, in comparisons of line length and tone loudness, the first stimulus had the greater weight in determining the subjective difference for short ISIs, the second for longer ISIs. In comparisons of duration (auditory and visual), the second stimulus had the greater weight. For simultaneously presented line lengths, the left stimulus had the greater weight.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14674641     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194842

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  17 in total

1.  A common processing system for duration, order and spatial information: evidence from a time estimation task.

Authors:  Massimiliano Conson; Fausta Cinque; Anna Maria Barbarulo; Luigi Trojano
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Discrimination is not impaired when more cortical space between two electro-tactile markers increases perceived duration.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Kuroda; Simon Grondin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Oscillatory EEG signatures of postponed somatosensory decisions.

Authors:  Simon Ludwig; Jan Herding; Felix Blankenburg
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Different methods for reproducing time, different results.

Authors:  Giovanna Mioni; Franca Stablum; Shawn M McClintock; Simon Grondin
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  GABA predicts time perception.

Authors:  Devin B Terhune; Sonia Russo; Jamie Near; Charlotte J Stagg; Roi Cohen Kadosh
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Improving the estimation of psychometric functions in 2AFC discrimination tasks.

Authors:  Miguel A García-Pérez; Rocío Alcalá-Quintana
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-05-11

7.  Prior and present evidence: how prior experience interacts with present information in a perceptual decision making task.

Authors:  Muhsin Karim; Justin A Harris; John W Morley; Michael Breakspear
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Filling the blanks in temporal intervals: the type of filling influences perceived duration and discrimination performance.

Authors:  Ninja K Horr; Massimiliano Di Luca
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-11

9.  Taking a long look at isochrony: perceived duration increases with temporal, but not stimulus regularity.

Authors:  Ninja K Horr; Massimiliano Di Luca
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  The influence of prior experience and expected timing on vibrotactile discrimination.

Authors:  Muhsin Karim; Justin A Harris; Angela Langdon; Michael Breakspear
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.