Literature DB >> 35576072

Training the brain to time: the effect of neurofeedback of SMR-Beta1 rhythm on time perception in healthy adults.

Behnoush Behzadifard1, Saied Sabaghypour2, Farhad Farkhondeh Tale Navi2, Mohammad Ali Nazari3.   

Abstract

The timing ability plays an important role in everyday activities and is influenced by several factors such as the attention and arousal levels of the individuals. The effects of these factors on time perception have been interpreted through psychological models of time, including Attentional Gate Model (AGM). On the other hand, research has indicated that neurofeedback (NFB) training improves attention and increases arousal levels in the clinical and healthy population. Regarding the link between attentional processing and arousal levels and NFB and their relation to time perception, this study is a pilot demonstration of the influence of SMR-Beta1 (12-18 Hz) NFB training on time production and reproduction performance in healthy adults. To this end, 12 (9 female and 3 males; M = 26.3, SD = 3.8) and 12 participants (7 female and 5 males; M = 26.9, SD = 3.1) were randomly assigned into the experimental (with SMR-Beta1 NFB) and control groups (without any NFB training), respectively. The experimental group underwent intensive 10 sessions (3 days a week) of the 12-18 Hz up-training. Time production and reproduction performance were assessed pre and post NFB training for all participants. Three-way mixed ANOVA was carried out on T-corrected scores of reproduction and production tasks. Correlation analysis was also performed between SMR-Beta1 and time perception. While NFB training significantly influenced time production (P < 0.01), no such effect was observed for the time reproduction task. The results of the study are finally discussed within the frameworks of AGM, dual-process and cognitive aspects of time perception. Overall, our results contribute to disentangling the underlying mechanisms of temporal performance in healthy individuals.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attentional gate model; Neurofeedback; SMR–Beta1 training; Time perception; Time production; Time reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35576072     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-022-06380-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   2.064


  68 in total

1.  Human aging and duration judgments: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  R A Block; D Zakay; P A Hancock
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1998-12

2.  β oscillations are linked to the initiation of sensory-cued movement sequences and the internal guidance of regular tapping in the monkey.

Authors:  Ramón Bartolo; Hugo Merchant
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Information processing in the primate basal ganglia during sensory-guided and internally driven rhythmic tapping.

Authors:  Ramón Bartolo; Luis Prado; Hugo Merchant
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Temporal-signal detection and individual differences in timing.

Authors:  S W Brown; D C Newcomb; K G Kahrl
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Time perception and attention: the effects of prospective versus retrospective paradigms and task demands on perceived duration.

Authors:  S W Brown
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1985-08

6.  EEG neurofeedback for ADHD: double-blind sham-controlled randomized pilot feasibility trial.

Authors:  L Eugene Arnold; Nicholas Lofthouse; Sarah Hersch; Xueliang Pan; Elizabeth Hurt; Bethany Bates; Kathleen Kassouf; Stacey Moone; Cara Grantier
Journal:  J Atten Disord       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.256

7.  Impulsivity, time perception, emotion and reinforcement sensitivity in patients with orbitofrontal cortex lesions.

Authors:  H A Berlin; E T Rolls; U Kischka
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2004-02-25       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Corrective movements in response to displacements in visual feedback are more effective during periods of 13-35 Hz oscillatory synchrony in the human corticospinal system.

Authors:  Alexandros G Androulidakis; Louise M F Doyle; Thomas P Gilbertson; Peter Brown
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  Individual differences in working memory capacity and temporal discrimination.

Authors:  James M Broadway; Randall W Engle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Editorial: Neurofeedback in ADHD.

Authors:  Martijn Arns; Hartmut Heinrich; Tomas Ros; Aribert Rothenberger; Ute Strehl
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.