Literature DB >> 7816535

Contrasting task demands alter the perceived duration of brief time intervals.

T F Sawyer1, P J Meyers, S J Huser.   

Abstract

Four experiments were performed to assess the effects of task differences on duration judgments. Experiments 1 and 2 used the method of reproduction in prospective, within-subjects designs; their results supported previous research on the effects of task difficulty. Both experiments, using tasks that varied along somewhat different dimensions, found that subjects provided reproduction values that varied inversely with task difficulty. That is, while subjects tended to underreproduce across all tasks, the more difficult the task performed during the target interval, the greater the extent of the underreproduction. Experiments 3 and 4 used a modification of the reproduction method by placing demands upon the subjects during both the target interval and the reproduction phase of each trial; they demonstrated that the greater the degree of contrast between demands made by the task performed during the target interval and those made during reproduction, the less accurate the duration reproduction. The results are discussed in terms of the contextual and resource allocation models of duration estimation.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7816535     DOI: 10.3758/bf03208358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  10 in total

1.  Prospective and retrospective judgments of time as a function of amount of information processed.

Authors:  R E Hicks; G W Miller; M Kinsbourne
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1976-12

2.  The Stroop phenomenon and its use in the stlldy of perceptual, cognitive, and response processes.

Authors:  F N Dyer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1973-06

3.  The effect on time estimation of increasing the complexity of a cognitive task.

Authors:  N C Smith
Journal:  J Gen Psychol       Date:  1969-10

Review 4.  The Stroop color-word test: a review.

Authors:  A R Jensen; W D Rohwer
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1966

5.  Time estimation methods--do they influence prospective duration estimates?

Authors:  D Zakay
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  The influence of task difficulty and external tempo on subjective time estimation.

Authors:  D Zakay; D Nitzan; J Glicksohn
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-11

7.  Immediate and remote time estimation--a comparison.

Authors:  D Zakay; E Fallach
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1984-09

8.  Duration judgment and the segmentation of experience.

Authors:  W D Poynter
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1983-01

9.  Effects of concurrent verbal rehearsal and temporal set upon judgments of temporal duration.

Authors:  G W Miller; R E Hicks; M Willette
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1978-05

10.  Time perception and attention: the effects of prospective versus retrospective paradigms and task demands on perceived duration.

Authors:  S W Brown
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1985-08
  10 in total
  8 in total

1.  Neural substrates of time perception and impulsivity.

Authors:  Marc Wittmann; Alan N Simmons; Taru Flagan; Scott D Lane; Jiří Wackermann; Martin P Paulus
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2011-06-26       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Changing time and emotions.

Authors:  Pierre-Yves Geoffard; Stéphane Luchini
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Accumulation of neural activity in the posterior insula encodes the passage of time.

Authors:  Marc Wittmann; Alan N Simmons; Jennifer L Aron; Martin P Paulus
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-06-19       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Different methods for reproducing time, different results.

Authors:  Giovanna Mioni; Franca Stablum; Shawn M McClintock; Simon Grondin
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  The effect of attention and working memory on the estimation of elapsed time.

Authors:  Ignacio Polti; Benoît Martin; Virginie van Wassenhove
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Subjective time compression induced by continuous action.

Authors:  Sayako Ueda; Shingo Shimoda
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Visual tracking combined with hand-tracking improves time perception of moving stimuli.

Authors:  Alessandro Carlini; Robert French
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Visual-auditory differences in duration discrimination of intervals in the subsecond and second range.

Authors:  Thomas H Rammsayer; Natalie Borter; Stefan J Troche
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-10-26
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.