Literature DB >> 24469685

Variability of subspecialty-specific anesthesia-controlled times at two academic institutions.

Bhavani Shankar Kodali1, K Dennie Kim, Hugh Flanagan, Jesse M Ehrenfeld, Richard D Urman.   

Abstract

Realistic scheduling of operating room cases decreases costs, optimizes utilization and improves staff and patient satisfaction. Currently limited data exists to establish anesthesia-controlled time benchmarks based on specific subspecialty service. In this multicenter retrospective analysis of cases performed during a 53 month period at two large multispecialty academic institutions, data were retrieved from the perioperative information systems at each center. Both induction and emergence times were calculated. We then determined mean and median anesthesia controlled times based on each subspecialty service and compared them to previously published anesthesia-controlled time data. We obtained data on 104,184 cases at hospital A, and 122,560 cases at Hospital B. For all specialties at hospital A and hospital B, median induction time was 16.0 min and 17.0 min, emergence time was 14.0 and 8.0 min, and total anesthesia controlled time was 31.0 min and 27.0 min respectively. There was considerable variability among different surgical specialties deviating from the previously established 30 min benchmark. Subspecialties with lower total anesthesia controlled times in both centers were pain, general surgery, gynecology, plastic surgery and urology. Subspecialties with higher total anesthesia controlled times in both centers included cardiac surgery, neurosurgery, transplant and vascular. Cardiac surgery had the highest total time of 60 min and 50 min at Hospital A and B respectively. Individual specialty-specific anesthesia controlled times should be used for case scheduling and to benchmark anesthesia performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24469685     DOI: 10.1007/s10916-014-0011-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  25 in total

1.  Introduction of anesthesia resident trainees to the operating room does not lead to changes in anesthesia-controlled times for efficiency measures.

Authors:  Sunil Eappen; Hugh Flanagan; Neil Bhattacharyya
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Resident teaching versus the operating room schedule: an independent observer-based study of 1558 cases.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Davis; Alejandro Escobar; Jan Ehrenwerth; Gail A Watrous; Gene S Fisch; Zeev N Kain; Paul G Barash
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Anesthesia preparation time is not affected by the experience level of the resident involved during his/her first month of adult cardiac surgery.

Authors:  David M Broussard; Michael C Couch
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2011-06-25       Impact factor: 2.628

4.  Glossary of times used for scheduling and monitoring of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures.

Authors: 
Journal:  AORN J       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 0.676

5.  Statistical modeling to predict elective surgery time. Comparison with a computer scheduling system and surgeon-provided estimates.

Authors:  I H Wright; C Kooperberg; B A Bonar; G Bashein
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Implementation of the World Health Organization surgical safety checklist, including introduction of pulse oximetry, in a resource-limited setting.

Authors:  Alvin C Kwok; Luke M Funk; Ruslan Baltaga; Stuart R Lipsitz; Alan F Merry; Gerald Dziekan; Gheorghe Ciobanu; William R Berry; Atul A Gawande
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  The total quality process applied to the operating rooms and other clinical processes.

Authors:  S Dufek; E Gaucher; J Gialanella; E Kratochwill; D Learned; P Sonda; J Wood; L Greenfield; P Lyons; G Zuidema
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Standardization of Anaesthesia Ready Time and reasons of delay in induction of anaesthesia.

Authors:  Saeed U Zafar; Fauzia Anees Khan; Mueenullah Khan
Journal:  J Pak Med Assoc       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 0.781

9.  Prevention of central venous catheter-related infections by using maximal sterile barrier precautions during insertion.

Authors:  I I Raad; D C Hohn; B J Gilbreath; N Suleiman; L A Hill; P A Bruso; K Marts; P F Mansfield; G P Bodey
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.254

10.  Decreases in anesthesia-controlled time cannot permit one additional surgical operation to be reliably scheduled during the workday.

Authors:  F Dexter; S Coffin; J H Tinker
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.108

View more
  10 in total

1.  The Impact of Overestimations of Surgical Control Times Across Multiple Specialties on Medical Systems.

Authors:  Albert Wu; Ethan Y Brovman; Edward E Whang; Jesse M Ehrenfeld; Richard D Urman
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Operating room metrics score card-creating a prototype for individualized feedback.

Authors:  Rodney A Gabriel; Robert Gimlich; Jesse M Ehrenfeld; Richard D Urman
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  Preparatory Time-Related Hand Surgery Operating Room Inefficiency: A Systems Analysis.

Authors:  Michael T Milone; Heero Hacquebord; Louis W Catalano; Steven Z Glickel; Jacques H Hacquebord
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2019-02-27

4.  Effect of the Implementation of a New Electronic Health Record System on Surgical Case Turnover Time.

Authors:  Joseph McDowell; Albert Wu; Jesse M Ehrenfeld; Richard D Urman
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 4.460

5.  Comment on research article entitled "variability of subspecialty-specific anesthesia-controlled times at two academic institutions" as published in J Med Syst 2014; 38 (11).

Authors:  Elizabeth van Veen-Berkx; J Bitter; S G Elkhuizen; W F Buhre; C J Kalkman; H G Gooszen; G Kazemier
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 4.460

6.  Effect of Anesthesia Staffing Ratio on First-Case Surgical Start Time.

Authors:  York Chen; Rodney A Gabriel; Bhavani S Kodali; Richard D Urman
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 4.460

7.  Introduction of a new electronic medical record system has mixed effects on first surgical case efficiency metrics.

Authors:  Albert Wu; Bhavani S Kodali; Hugh L Flanagan; Richard D Urman
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 2.502

8.  Improving operating room turnover time: a systems based approach.

Authors:  Ankeet S Bhatt; Grant W Carlson; Peter J Deckers
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 4.460

9.  Operating theatre time, where does it all go? A prospective observational study.

Authors:  Elizabeth Travis; Sarah Woodhouse; Ruth Tan; Sandeep Patel; Jason Donovan; Kit Brogan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-12-15

Review 10.  Critical care nephrology: could it be a model of multidisciplinarity in ICU nowadays for other sub-specialities - the jury is out.

Authors:  Patrick M Honoré; Rita Jacobs; Olivier Joannes-Boyau; Elisabeth De Waele; Jouke De Regt; Viola Van Gorp; Herbert D Spapen
Journal:  Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis       Date:  2014-11-25
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.