PURPOSE: To validate computer software developed to assess digital corneal photographs of fungal keratitis in clinical research. METHODS: A cornea specialist and five medical students (after training) graded on two occasions 100 corneal photographs of patients with fungal keratitis using Optscore software. Variables assessed were lesion area, location, degree of opacity, percentage of the ulcer lying within a central 4 mm circle of the cornea. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to assess intragrader reliability, agreement of the students with the corneal specialist, and the reliability of the group mean of the student raters. The area determined using Optscore was compared to the area estimated from slit lamp and to visual acuity. RESULTS: As a group, medical students achieved an ICC greater than 0.9 for five out of the seven assessed variables. Similar levels of consistency were found after analyzing the graders' individual results compared to the specialist. The area estimated using slit lamp examination was highly correlated with the mean area determined by Optscore, as was the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity at enrollment. CONCLUSIONS: Non-expert graders using Optscore to assess digital photographs of fungal keratitis are self-consistent, agree with an expert grader both as a group and individually, and measurements of ulcer area obtained from Optscore are highly correlated with measurements of the same patients obtained on clinical examination. These observations support the validity of Optscore for assessing corneal pathology associated with fungal keratitis and make it a promising clinical research tool.
PURPOSE: To validate computer software developed to assess digital corneal photographs of fungal keratitis in clinical research. METHODS: A cornea specialist and five medical students (after training) graded on two occasions 100 corneal photographs of patients with fungal keratitis using Optscore software. Variables assessed were lesion area, location, degree of opacity, percentage of the ulcer lying within a central 4 mm circle of the cornea. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to assess intragrader reliability, agreement of the students with the corneal specialist, and the reliability of the group mean of the student raters. The area determined using Optscore was compared to the area estimated from slit lamp and to visual acuity. RESULTS: As a group, medical students achieved an ICC greater than 0.9 for five out of the seven assessed variables. Similar levels of consistency were found after analyzing the graders' individual results compared to the specialist. The area estimated using slit lamp examination was highly correlated with the mean area determined by Optscore, as was the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity at enrollment. CONCLUSIONS: Non-expert graders using Optscore to assess digital photographs of fungal keratitis are self-consistent, agree with an expert grader both as a group and individually, and measurements of ulcer area obtained from Optscore are highly correlated with measurements of the same patients obtained on clinical examination. These observations support the validity of Optscore for assessing corneal pathology associated with fungal keratitis and make it a promising clinical research tool.
Authors: Jeane Haidee Mah-Sadorra; S Gulderen Aktan Yavuz; Dany M Najjar; Peter R Laibson; Christopher J Rapuano; Elisabeth J Cohen Journal: Cornea Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 2.651
Authors: Namperumalsamy V Prajna; Jeena Mascarenhas; Tiruvengada Krishnan; P Ravindranath Reddy; Lalitha Prajna; Muthiah Srinivasan; C M Vaitilingam; Kevin C Hong; Salena M Lee; Stephen D McLeod; Michael E Zegans; Travis C Porco; Thomas M Lietman; Nisha R Acharya Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2010-06
Authors: Francisco Gómez-Ulla; Maria I Fernandez; Francisco Gonzalez; Pablo Rey; Marta Rodriguez; Maria J Rodriguez-Cid; Felipe F Casanueva; Maria A Tome; Javier Garcia-Tobio; Francisco Gude Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Mohammad H Dastjerdi; Khalid M Al-Arfaj; Nambi Nallasamy; Pedram Hamrah; Ula V Jurkunas; Roberto Pineda; Deborah Pavan-Langston; Reza Dana Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2009-04
Authors: Tapan P Patel; N Venkatesh Prajna; Sina Farsiu; Nita G Valikodath; Leslie M Niziol; Lakshey Dudeja; Kyeong Hwan Kim; Maria A Woodward Journal: Cornea Date: 2018-03 Impact factor: 2.651
Authors: Jessica Loo; Matthias F Kriegel; Megan M Tuohy; Kyeong Hwan Kim; Venkatesh Prajna; Maria A Woodward; Sina Farsiu Journal: IEEE J Biomed Health Inform Date: 2021-01-05 Impact factor: 5.772