Literature DB >> 15778595

White-to-white corneal diameter: normal values in healthy humans obtained with the Orbscan II topography system.

Florian Rüfer1, Anke Schröder, Carl Erb.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The corneal horizontal diameter (white-to-white) is abnormal in diseases like microcornea, relative anterior microphthalmos, and corneal dystrophies. Because normal values are described imprecisely in the literature, the purpose of this study was to reevaluate the horizontal corneal diameter as a scientific parameter.
METHODS: The horizontal corneal diameter was measured with the Orbscan II system in 370 right eyes and 373 left eyes of 390 healthy white subjects aged 10-80 years. There were 148 female subjects and 242 male subjects. Each measurement was repeated twice. Differences in gender, between right and left eyes, and age-related alterations were analyzed statistically.
RESULTS: The average corneal diameter was 11.71 +/- 0.42 mm. The average corneal diameter was 11.77 +/- 0.37 mm in males compared with 11.64 +/- 0.47 mm in females. The resulting normal ranges were 11.04 to 12.50 for males and 10.70 to 12.58 mm for females. Differences in gender were not significant in the t test for independent samples (P = 0.071). There were no statistically significant differences between right and left eyes in the t test for dependent samples (P = 0.16). Corneal diameters decreased slightly with age.
CONCLUSIONS: With the obtained normal values, more precise determination of microcornea and macrocornea will be possible in the future. The horizontal corneal diameter was not significantly greater in males than in females. Further studies are needed to show the reasons for the age-related decrease in measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15778595     DOI: 10.1097/01.ico.0000148312.01805.53

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  53 in total

1.  White-to-white corneal diameter, pupil diameter, central corneal thickness and thinnest corneal thickness values of emmetropic subjects.

Authors:  Juan A Sanchis-Gimeno; Daniel Sanchez-Zuriaga; Francisco Martinez-Soriano
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2011-10-22       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Evaluation of myopic corneal diameter with the Orbscan II Topography System.

Authors:  Yi Zha; Wangqiang Feng; Xiaohui Han; Jianqiu Cai
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-06-02       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Photorefractive keratectomy in the cat eye: biological and optical outcomes.

Authors:  Lana J Nagy; Scott MacRae; Geunyoung Yoon; Matthew Wyble; Jianhua Wang; Ian Cox; Krystel R Huxlin
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  Spatially heterogeneous corneal mechanical responses before and after riboflavin-ultraviolet-A crosslinking.

Authors:  Joel R Palko; Junhua Tang; Benjamin Cruz Perez; Xueliang Pan; Jun Liu
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 3.351

5.  Evaluating the growth of eyelid lesions: comparison of clinical evaluation and a software-based model.

Authors:  Julie Linden Soto; Ivan Vrcek; Omar Ozgur; Ronald Mancini
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 2.031

6.  A novel technique for the measurement of eyelid contour to compare outcomes following Muller's muscle-conjunctival resection and external levator resection surgery.

Authors:  Jennifer Danesh; Shoaib Ugradar; Robert Goldberg; Daniel B Rootman
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  A stochastic model of corneal epithelium maintenance and recovery following perturbation.

Authors:  E Moraki; R Grima; K J Painter
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 2.259

8.  Corneal white-to-white distance and mesopic pupil diameter.

Authors:  Hasan Basri Cakmak; Nurullah Cagil; Huseyin Simavli; Sabri Raza
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

9.  Evaluation of fungal keratitis using a newly developed computer program, Optscore, for grading digital corneal photographs.

Authors:  Christine M Toutain-Kidd; Travis C Porco; Eric M Kidd; M Srinivasan; Namperumalsamy V Prajna; Nisha Acharya; Thomas Lietman; Michael E Zegans
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.648

10.  Comparison of Eyemetrics and Orbscan automated method to determine horizontal corneal diameter.

Authors:  Arvind Venkataraman; Sapna K Mardi; Sarita Pillai
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.848

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.