M K Pein1, S Brandt, S K Plontke, S Kösling. 1. Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik für HNO-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Deutschland, katharina.pein@medizin.uni-halle.de.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the visualization of subtle, non-pathological temporal bone structures on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) in vivo. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Temporal bone studies of images from 38 patients archived in the picture archiving and communication system (PACS) were analyzed (slice thickness MDCT 0.6 mm and CBCT 0.125 mm) of which 23 were imaged by MDCT and 15 by CBCT using optimized standard protocols. Inclusion criteria were normal radiological findings, absence of previous surgery and anatomical variants. Images were evaluated blind by three trained observers. Using a five-point scale the visualization of ten subtle structures of the temporal bone was analyzed. RESULTS: Subtle middle ear structures showed a tendency to be more easily distinguishable by CBCT with significantly better visualization of the tendon of the stapedius muscle and the crura of the stapes on CBCT (p = 0.003 and p = 0.033, respectively). In contrast, inner ear components, such as the osseus spiral lamina and the modiolus tended to be better detectable on MDCT, showing significant differences for the osseous spiral lamina (p = 0.001). The interrater reliability was 0.73 (Cohen's kappa coefficient) and intraobserver reliability was 0.89. CONCLUSION: The use of CBCT and MDCT allows equivalent and excellent imaging results if optimized protocols are chosen. With both imaging techniques subtle temporal bone structures could be visualized with a similar degree of definition. In vivo differences do not seem to be as large as suggested in several previous studies.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the visualization of subtle, non-pathological temporal bone structures on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) in vivo. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Temporal bone studies of images from 38 patients archived in the picture archiving and communication system (PACS) were analyzed (slice thickness MDCT 0.6 mm and CBCT 0.125 mm) of which 23 were imaged by MDCT and 15 by CBCT using optimized standard protocols. Inclusion criteria were normal radiological findings, absence of previous surgery and anatomical variants. Images were evaluated blind by three trained observers. Using a five-point scale the visualization of ten subtle structures of the temporal bone was analyzed. RESULTS: Subtle middle ear structures showed a tendency to be more easily distinguishable by CBCT with significantly better visualization of the tendon of the stapedius muscle and the crura of the stapes on CBCT (p = 0.003 and p = 0.033, respectively). In contrast, inner ear components, such as the osseus spiral lamina and the modiolus tended to be better detectable on MDCT, showing significant differences for the osseous spiral lamina (p = 0.001). The interrater reliability was 0.73 (Cohen's kappa coefficient) and intraobserver reliability was 0.89. CONCLUSION: The use of CBCT and MDCT allows equivalent and excellent imaging results if optimized protocols are chosen. With both imaging techniques subtle temporal bone structures could be visualized with a similar degree of definition. In vivo differences do not seem to be as large as suggested in several previous studies.
Authors: Hartmut W Husstedt; Antje Aschendorff; Bernhard Richter; Roland Laszig; Martin Schumacher Journal: Otol Neurotol Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 2.311
Authors: O Majdani; K Thews; S Bartling; M Leinung; C Dalchow; R Labadie; T Lenarz; G Heidrich Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2009-04-15 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: R Patcas; G Markic; L Müller; O Ullrich; T Peltomäki; C J Kellenberger; C A Karlo Journal: Dentomaxillofac Radiol Date: 2012-05-03 Impact factor: 2.419
Authors: M C Ketterer; A Aschendorff; S Arndt; F Hassepass; T Wesarg; R Laszig; R Beck Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2017-12-14 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Pekka Tamminen; Jorma Järnstedt; Antti Lehtinen; Jura Numminen; Lauri Lehtimäki; Markus Rautiainen; Ilkka Kivekäs Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2022-09-16 Impact factor: 3.236
Authors: Eva Klintström; Benjamin Klintström; Rodrigo Moreno; Torkel B Brismar; Dieter H Pahr; Örjan Smedby Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-08-11 Impact factor: 3.240