Literature DB >> 24458961

Classifying prosthetic use via accelerometry in persons with transtibial amputations.

Morgan T Redfield1, John C Cagle, Brian J Hafner, Joan E Sanders.   

Abstract

Knowledge of how persons with amputation use their prostheses and how this use changes over time may facilitate effective rehabilitation practices and enhance understanding of prosthesis functionality. Perpetual monitoring and classification of prosthesis use may also increase the health and quality of life for prosthetic users. Existing monitoring and classification systems are often limited in that they require the subject to manipulate the sensor (e.g., attach, remove, or reset a sensor), record data over relatively short time periods, and/or classify a limited number of activities and body postures of interest. In this study, a commercially available three-axis accelerometer (ActiLife ActiGraph GT3X+) was used to characterize the activities and body postures of individuals with transtibial amputation. Accelerometers were mounted on prosthetic pylons of 10 persons with transtibial amputation as they performed a preset routine of actions. Accelerometer data was postprocessed using a binary decision tree to identify when the prosthesis was being worn and to classify periods of use as movement (i.e., leg motion such as walking or stair climbing), standing (i.e., standing upright with limited leg motion), or sitting (i.e., seated with limited leg motion). Classifications were compared to visual observation by study researchers. The classifier achieved a mean +/- standard deviation accuracy of 96.6% +/- 3.0%.

Entities:  

Keywords:  accelerometry; activity zzm321990monitor; activity/posture classification; ambulatory monitoring; amputees; artificial limbs; prosthesis; prosthesis use; rehabilitation; transtibial amputation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24458961      PMCID: PMC4423801          DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2012.12.0233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev        ISSN: 0748-7711


  25 in total

1.  A real-time and self-calibrating algorithm based on triaxial accelerometer signals for the detection of human posture and activity.

Authors:  Davide Curone; Gian Mario Bertolotti; Andrea Cristiani; Emanuele Lindo Secco; Giovanni Magenes
Journal:  IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed       Date:  2010-05-18

Review 2.  Residual limb volume change: systematic review of measurement and management.

Authors:  Joan E Sanders; Stefania Fatone
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2011

3.  Ambulation monitoring of transtibial amputation subjects with patient activity monitor versus pedometer.

Authors:  Nancy L Dudek; Omar D Khan; Edward D Lemaire; Meridith B Marks; Leyana Saville
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2008

4.  Can accelerometry be used to discriminate levels of activity?

Authors:  P Hendrick; M L Bell; P J Bagge; S Milosavljevic
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Ambulation of people with lower-limb amputations: relationship between capacity and performance measures.

Authors:  Kim Parker; R Lee Kirby; James Adderson; Kara Thompson
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 6.  Direct measurement of human movement by accelerometry.

Authors:  A Godfrey; R Conway; D Meagher; G OLaighin
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 2.242

7.  Clinical utility of in-socket residual limb volume change measurement: case study results.

Authors:  Joan E Sanders; Daniel S Harrison; Katheryn J Allyn; Timothy R Myers
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.895

Review 8.  Accelerometry: a technique for quantifying movement patterns during walking.

Authors:  Justin J Kavanagh; Hylton B Menz
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 2.840

9.  Six-minute walk test in persons with transtibial amputation.

Authors:  Suh-Jen Lin; Nisha Hathi Bose
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Activity levels among lower-limb amputees: self-report versus step activity monitor.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Stepien; Sally Cavenett; Leigh Taylor; Maria Crotty
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.966

View more
  9 in total

1.  Separation of rotational and translational segmental momentum to assess movement coordination during walking.

Authors:  Brecca M M Gaffney; Cory L Christiansen; Amanda M Murray; Anne K Silverman; Bradley S Davidson
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 2.161

2.  Effects of socket size on metrics of socket fit in trans-tibial prosthesis users.

Authors:  Joan E Sanders; Robert T Youngblood; Brian J Hafner; John C Cagle; Jake B McLean; Christian B Redd; Colin R Dietrich; Marcia A Ciol; Katheryn J Allyn
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 2.242

Review 3.  Machine learning in human movement biomechanics: Best practices, common pitfalls, and new opportunities.

Authors:  Eni Halilaj; Apoorva Rajagopal; Madalina Fiterau; Jennifer L Hicks; Trevor J Hastie; Scott L Delp
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 4.  Considerations for development of sensing and monitoring tools to facilitate treatment and care of persons with lower-limb loss: a review.

Authors:  Brian J Hafner; Joan E Sanders
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2014

5.  Prosthetists' perceptions of information obtained from a lower limb prosthesis monitoring system: a pilot study.

Authors:  Geoffrey S Balkman; Andrew C Vamos; Joan E Sanders; Brian G Larsen; Brian J Hafner
Journal:  J Prosthet Orthot       Date:  2019-04

6.  Technology for monitoring everyday prosthesis use: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alix Chadwell; Laura Diment; M Micó-Amigo; Dafne Z Morgado Ramírez; Alex Dickinson; Malcolm Granat; Laurence Kenney; Sisary Kheng; Mohammad Sobuh; Robert Ssekitoleko; Peter Worsley
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 4.262

7.  Maximal Walking Distance in Persons with a Lower Limb Amputation.

Authors:  Cheriel J Hofstad; Kim T J Bongers; Mark Didden; René F van Ee; Noël L W Keijsers
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Real time monitoring of transtibial elevated vacuum prostheses: A case series on socket air pressure.

Authors:  Katherine R Schoepp; Jonathon S Schofield; David Home; Michael R Dawson; Edmond Lou; McNiel Keri; Paul D Marasco; Jacqueline S Hebert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Reported Outcome Measures in Studies of Real-World Ambulation in People with a Lower Limb Amputation: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Mirjam Mellema; Terje Gjøvaag
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 3.576

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.