Literature DB >> 18712643

Ambulation monitoring of transtibial amputation subjects with patient activity monitor versus pedometer.

Nancy L Dudek1, Omar D Khan, Edward D Lemaire, Meridith B Marks, Leyana Saville.   

Abstract

Our study aimed to compare the accuracy of step count and ambulation distance determined with the Yamax Digi-Walker SW-700 pedometer (DW) and the Ossur patient activity monitor (PAM) in 20 transtibial amputation subjects who were functioning at the K3 Medicare Functional Classification Level. Subjects completed four simulated household tasks in an apartment setup and a gymnasium walking course designed to simulate outdoor walking without the presence of environmental barriers or varied terrain. The mean step count accuracy of the DW and the PAM was equivalent for both the household activity (75.3% vs 70.6%) and the walking course (93.8% vs 94.0%). The mean distance measurement accuracy was better with the DW than with the PAM (household activity: 72.8% vs 0%, walking course: 92.5% vs 86.3%; p < 0.05). With acceptable step count accuracy, both devices are appropriate for assessing relatively continuous ambulation. The DW may be preferred for its more accurate distance measurements. Neither device is ideal for monitoring in-home ambulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18712643     DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.2007.05.0069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev        ISSN: 0748-7711


  6 in total

1.  Classifying prosthetic use via accelerometry in persons with transtibial amputations.

Authors:  Morgan T Redfield; John C Cagle; Brian J Hafner; Joan E Sanders
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2013

2.  Prosthetists' perceptions of information obtained from a lower limb prosthesis monitoring system: a pilot study.

Authors:  Geoffrey S Balkman; Andrew C Vamos; Joan E Sanders; Brian G Larsen; Brian J Hafner
Journal:  J Prosthet Orthot       Date:  2019-04

3.  Management, outcome, and novel classification system of periprosthetic fractures in patients with transcutaneous osseointegrated prosthetic systems (TOPS)-a retrospective cohort analysis.

Authors:  Marcus Örgel; Maximilian Petri; Alexander Ranker; Nils Wirries; Tilman Graulich; Christian Krettek; Marcel Winkelmann; Horst-Heinrich Aschoff
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 2.928

4.  Monitoring activity of inpatient lower limb prosthetic users in rehabilitation using accelerometry: Validation study.

Authors:  Salih A Salih; Nancye M Peel; Kara Burgess
Journal:  J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng       Date:  2016-05-05

5.  Functional level assessment of individuals with transtibial limb loss: Evaluation in the clinical setting versus objective community ambulatory activity.

Authors:  Michael S Orendurff; Silvia U Raschke; Lorne Winder; David Moe; David A Boone; Toshiki Kobayashi
Journal:  J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng       Date:  2016-03-09

6.  Monitoring functional capability of individuals with lower limb amputations using mobile phones.

Authors:  Mark V Albert; Cliodhna McCarthy; Juliana Valentin; Megan Herrmann; Konrad Kording; Arun Jayaraman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.