Literature DB >> 31067952

Speech recognition as a function of the number of channels in perimodiolar electrode recipients.

Katelyn A Berg1, Jack H Noble2, Benoit M Dawant2, Robert T Dwyer1, Robert F Labadie3, René H Gifford1.   

Abstract

This study investigated the number of channels needed for maximum speech understanding and sound quality in 30 adult cochlear implant (CI) recipients with perimodiolar electrode arrays verified via imaging to be completely within scala tympani (ST). Performance was assessed using a continuous interleaved sampling (CIS) strategy with 4, 8, 10, and 16 channels and n-of-m with 16 maxima. Listeners were administered auditory tasks of speech understanding [monosyllables, sentences (quiet and +5 dB signal-to-noise ratio, SNR), vowels, consonants], spectral modulation detection, as well as subjective estimates of sound quality. Results were as follows: (1) significant performance gains were observed for speech in quiet (monosyllables and sentences) with 16- as compared to 8-channel CIS, (2) 16 channels in a 16-of-m strategy yielded significantly higher outcomes than 16-channel CIS for sentences in noise (percent correct and subjective sound quality) and spectral modulation detection, (3) 16 channels in a 16-of-m strategy yielded significantly higher outcomes as compared to 8- and 10-channel CIS for monosyllables, sentences (quiet and noise), consonants, spectral modulation detection, and subjective sound quality, (4) 16 versus 8 maxima yielded significantly higher speech recognition for monosyllables and sentences in noise using an n-of-m strategy, and (5) the degree of benefit afforded by 16 versus 8 maxima was inversely correlated with mean electrode-to-modiolus distance. These data demonstrate greater channel independence with perimodiolar electrode arrays as compared to previous studies with straight electrodes and warrant further investigation of the minimum number of maxima and number of channels needed for maximum auditory outcomes.

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31067952      PMCID: PMC6435372          DOI: 10.1121/1.5092350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  24 in total

1.  Effects of electrode location and spacing on phoneme recognition with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant.

Authors:  Q J Fu; R V Shannon
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Recognition of sentences in noise by normal-hearing listeners using simulations of speak-type cochlear implant signal processors.

Authors:  P C Loizou; M F Dorman; Z Tu; J Fitzke
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  2000-12

3.  Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.

Authors:  L M Friesen; R V Shannon; D Baskent; X Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The effect of parametric variations of cochlear implant processors on speech understanding.

Authors:  P C Loizou; O Poroy; M Dorman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Signal coding in cochlear implants: exploiting stochastic effects of electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Jay T Rubinstein; Robert Hong
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  2003-09

6.  Effect of stimulation rate on cochlear implant users' phoneme, word and sentence recognition in quiet and in noise.

Authors:  Robert V Shannon; Rachel J Cruz; John J Galvin
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 1.854

7.  Better speech recognition with cochlear implants.

Authors:  B S Wilson; C C Finley; D T Lawson; R D Wolford; D K Eddington; W M Rabinowitz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Development and validation of the AzBio sentence lists.

Authors:  Anthony J Spahr; Michael F Dorman; Leonid M Litvak; Susan Van Wie; Rene H Gifford; Philipos C Loizou; Louise M Loiselle; Tyler Oakes; Sarah Cook
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  ECAP spread of excitation with virtual channels and physical electrodes.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Lisa J Stille; Jacquelyn L Baudhuin; Jenny L Goehring
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Statistical shape model segmentation and frequency mapping of cochlear implant stimulation targets in CT.

Authors:  Jack H Noble; René H Gifford; Robert F Labadie; Benoît M Dawant
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2012
View more
  24 in total

1.  Matched Cohort Comparison Indicates Superiority of Precurved Electrode Arrays.

Authors:  Jourdan T Holder; Robert J Yawn; Ashley M Nassiri; Robert T Dwyer; Alejandro Rivas; Robert F Labadie; René H Gifford
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Speech recognition with cochlear implants as a function of the number of channels: Effects of electrode placement.

Authors:  Katelyn A Berg; Jack H Noble; Benoit M Dawant; Robert T Dwyer; Robert F Labadie; René H Gifford
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Toddlers' fast-mapping from noise-vocoded speech.

Authors:  Rochelle S Newman; Giovanna Morini; Emily Shroads; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  A Graph-Based Method for Optimal Active Electrode Selection in Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Erin Bratu; Robert Dwyer; Jack Noble
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2020-09-29

5.  Children's syntactic parsing and sentence comprehension with a degraded auditory signal.

Authors:  Isabel A Martin; Matthew J Goupell; Yi Ting Huang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Computed-Tomography Estimates of Interaural Mismatch in Insertion Depth and Scalar Location in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Jack H Noble; Sandeep A Phatak; Elizabeth Kolberg; Miranda Cleary; Olga A Stakhovskaya; Kenneth K Jensen; Michael Hoa; Hung Jeffrey Kim; Joshua G W Bernstein
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 2.619

7.  Strategic perceptual weighting of acoustic cues for word stress in listeners with cochlear implants, acoustic hearing, or simulated bimodal hearing.

Authors:  Justin T Fleming; Matthew B Winn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 2.482

8.  Speech recognition as a function of the number of channels for pediatric cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Linsey W Sunderhaus; Jourdan T Holder; Katelyn A Berg; Benoit M Dawant; Jack H Noble; Elizabeth Perkins; Stephen Camarata
Journal:  JASA Express Lett       Date:  2022-09

9.  Speech recognition as a function of the number of channels for an array with large inter-electrode distances.

Authors:  Katelyn A Berg; Jack H Noble; Benoit M Dawant; Robert T Dwyer; Robert F Labadie; René H Gifford
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Viral-mediated transduction of auditory neurons with opsins for optical and hybrid activation.

Authors:  Rachael T Richardson; Alex C Thompson; Andrew K Wise; Elise A Ajay; Niliksha Gunewardene; Stephen J O'Leary; Paul R Stoddart; James B Fallon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.