Literature DB >> 24452989

Ensemble MD simulations restrained via crystallographic data: accurate structure leads to accurate dynamics.

Yi Xue1, Nikolai R Skrynnikov.   

Abstract

Currently, the best existing molecular dynamics (MD) force fields cannot accurately reproduce the global free-energy minimum which realizes the experimental protein structure. As a result, long MD trajectories tend to drift away from the starting coordinates (e.g., crystallographic structures). To address this problem, we have devised a new simulation strategy aimed at protein crystals. An MD simulation of protein crystal is essentially an ensemble simulation involving multiple protein molecules in a crystal unit cell (or a block of unit cells). To ensure that average protein coordinates remain correct during the simulation, we introduced crystallography-based restraints into the MD protocol. Because these restraints are aimed at the ensemble-average structure, they have only minimal impact on conformational dynamics of the individual protein molecules. So long as the average structure remains reasonable, the proteins move in a native-like fashion as dictated by the original force field. To validate this approach, we have used the data from solid-state NMR spectroscopy, which is the orthogonal experimental technique uniquely sensitive to protein local dynamics. The new method has been tested on the well-established model protein, ubiquitin. The ensemble-restrained MD simulations produced lower crystallographic R factors than conventional simulations; they also led to more accurate predictions for crystallographic temperature factors, solid-state chemical shifts, and backbone order parameters. The predictions for (15) N R1 relaxation rates are at least as accurate as those obtained from conventional simulations. Taken together, these results suggest that the presented trajectories may be among the most realistic protein MD simulations ever reported. In this context, the ensemble restraints based on high-resolution crystallographic data can be viewed as protein-specific empirical corrections to the standard force fields.
© 2014 The Protein Society.

Keywords:  15N relaxation; Molecular Dynamics simulations; chemical shifts; crystallographic B factors; crystallographic R factors; force fields; order parameters; protein crystallography; protein structure and dynamics; solid-state NMR; ubiquitin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24452989      PMCID: PMC3970899          DOI: 10.1002/pro.2433

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  91 in total

1.  How fast-folding proteins fold.

Authors:  Kresten Lindorff-Larsen; Stefano Piana; Ron O Dror; David E Shaw
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Protein dynamics of a beta-sheet protein.

Authors:  Marius Schmidt; Klaus Achterhold; Valeriy Prusakov; Fritz G Parak
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2009-03-07       Impact factor: 1.733

3.  Making optimal use of empirical energy functions: force-field parameterization in crystal space.

Authors:  Elmar Krieger; Tom Darden; Sander B Nabuurs; Alexei Finkelstein; Gert Vriend
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-12-01

4.  Inclusion of thermal motion in crystallographic structures by restrained molecular dynamics.

Authors:  P Gros; W F van Gunsteren; W G Hol
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-09-07       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Refinement of ensembles describing unstructured proteins using NMR residual dipolar couplings.

Authors:  Santi Esteban-Martín; Robert Bryn Fenwick; Xavier Salvatella
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  Variations on a theme by Debye and Waller: from simple crystals to proteins.

Authors:  A E García; J A Krumhansl; H Frauenfelder
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1997-10

7.  Application of 1H NMR chemical shifts to measure the quality of protein structures.

Authors:  M P Williamson; J Kikuchi; T Asakura
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1995-04-07       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  The structure of human ubiquitin in 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol: a new conformational switch.

Authors:  Kuo Ying Huang; Gabriele A Amodeo; Liang Tong; Ann McDermott
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  Improved side-chain torsion potentials for the Amber ff99SB protein force field.

Authors:  Kresten Lindorff-Larsen; Stefano Piana; Kim Palmo; Paul Maragakis; John L Klepeis; Ron O Dror; David E Shaw
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-06

10.  Site-resolved measurement of microsecond-to-millisecond conformational-exchange processes in proteins by solid-state NMR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Martin Tollinger; Astrid C Sivertsen; Beat H Meier; Matthias Ernst; Paul Schanda
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 15.419

View more
  13 in total

1.  Molecular dynamics simulation of triclinic lysozyme in a crystal lattice.

Authors:  Pawel A Janowski; Chunmei Liu; Jason Deckman; David A Case
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Biomolecular Solvation Structure Revealed by Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Authors:  Michael E Wall; Gaetano Calabró; Christopher I Bayly; David L Mobley; Gregory L Warren
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  All-atom crystal simulations of DNA and RNA duplexes.

Authors:  Chunmei Liu; Pawel A Janowski; David A Case
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2014-09-26

4.  Characterization of fibril dynamics on three timescales by solid-state NMR.

Authors:  Albert A Smith; Emilie Testori; Riccardo Cadalbert; Beat H Meier; Matthias Ernst
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 2.835

5.  Unveiling the "invisible" druggable conformations of GDP-bound inactive Ras.

Authors:  Dan Liu; Yunyun Mao; Xue Gu; Yang Zhou; Dong Long
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Computational Methodologies for Real-Space Structural Refinement of Large Macromolecular Complexes.

Authors:  Boon Chong Goh; Jodi A Hadden; Rafael C Bernardi; Abhishek Singharoy; Ryan McGreevy; Till Rudack; C Keith Cassidy; Klaus Schulten
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 12.981

7.  On Restraints in End-Point Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculations.

Authors:  William M Menzer; Bing Xie; David D L Minh
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 3.376

8.  Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Macromolecular Crystals.

Authors:  David S Cerutti; David A Case
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci       Date:  2018-11-16

Review 9.  Studying Dynamics by Magic-Angle Spinning Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy: Principles and Applications to Biomolecules.

Authors:  Paul Schanda; Matthias Ernst
Journal:  Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 9.795

Review 10.  Identifying and Visualizing Macromolecular Flexibility in Structural Biology.

Authors:  Martina Palamini; Anselmo Canciani; Federico Forneris
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2016-09-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.