Literature DB >> 26013419

Molecular dynamics simulation of triclinic lysozyme in a crystal lattice.

Pawel A Janowski1, Chunmei Liu1,2, Jason Deckman1, David A Case1.   

Abstract

Molecular dynamics simulations of crystals can enlighten interpretation of experimental X-ray crystallography data and elucidate structural dynamics and heterogeneity in biomolecular crystals. Furthermore, because of the direct comparison against experimental data, they can inform assessment of molecular dynamics methods and force fields. We present microsecond scale results for triclinic hen egg-white lysozyme in a supercell consisting of 12 independent unit cells using four contemporary force fields (Amber ff99SB, ff14ipq, ff14SB, and CHARMM 36) in crystalline and solvated states (for ff14SB only). We find the crystal simulations consistent across multiple runs of the same force field and robust to various solvent equilibration schemes. However, convergence is slow compared with solvent simulations. All the tested force fields reproduce experimental structural and dynamic properties well, but Amber ff14SB maintains structure and reproduces fluctuations closest to the experimental model: its average backbone structure differs from the deposited structure by 0.37Å; by contrast, the average backbone structure in solution differs from the deposited by 0.65Å. All the simulations are affected by a small progressive deterioration of the crystal lattice, presumably due to imperfect modeling of hydrogen bonding and other crystal contact interactions; this artifact is smallest in ff14SB, with average lattice positions deviating by 0.20Å from ideal. Side-chain disorder is surprisingly low with fewer than 30% of the nonglycine or alanine residues exhibiting significantly populated alternate rotamers. Our results provide helpful insight into the methodology of biomolecular crystal simulations and indicate directions for future work to obtain more accurate energy models for molecular dynamics.
© 2015 The Protein Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomolecular crystallography; computational crystallography; crystal simulations; force fields; lysozyme; molecular dynamics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26013419      PMCID: PMC4815314          DOI: 10.1002/pro.2713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  69 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  A consensus view of protein dynamics.

Authors:  Manuel Rueda; Carles Ferrer-Costa; Tim Meyer; Alberto Pérez; Jordi Camps; Adam Hospital; Josep Lluis Gelpí; Modesto Orozco
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters.

Authors:  Viktor Hornak; Robert Abel; Asim Okur; Bentley Strockbine; Adrian Roitberg; Carlos Simmerling
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2006-11-15

4.  Structural flexibility in proteins: impact of the crystal environment.

Authors:  Konrad Hinsen
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Theoretical studies of the structure and molecular dynamics of a peptide crystal.

Authors:  D H Kitson; A T Hagler
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1988-07-12       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Molecular dynamics study of the structure and dynamics of a protein molecule in a crystalline ionic environment, Streptomyces griseus protease A.

Authors:  F Avbelj; J Moult; D H Kitson; M N James; A T Hagler
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1990-09-18       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Derivation of fixed partial charges for amino acids accommodating a specific water model and implicit polarization.

Authors:  David S Cerutti; Julia E Rice; William C Swope; David A Case
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 2.991

8.  Optimization of the additive CHARMM all-atom protein force field targeting improved sampling of the backbone φ, ψ and side-chain χ(1) and χ(2) dihedral angles.

Authors:  Robert B Best; Xiao Zhu; Jihyun Shim; Pedro E M Lopes; Jeetain Mittal; Michael Feig; Alexander D Mackerell
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 6.006

9.  Assessment of biomolecular force fields for molecular dynamics simulations in a protein crystal.

Authors:  Zhongqiao Hu; Jianwen Jiang
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 3.376

10.  Structural phase transition of monoclinic crystals of hen egg-white lysozyme.

Authors:  Kazuaki Harata; Toshihiko Akiba
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2006-03-18
View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  X-ray Scattering Studies of Protein Structural Dynamics.

Authors:  Steve P Meisburger; William C Thomas; Maxwell B Watkins; Nozomi Ando
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  Biomolecular Solvation Structure Revealed by Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Authors:  Michael E Wall; Gaetano Calabró; Christopher I Bayly; David L Mobley; Gregory L Warren
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Measuring and modeling diffuse scattering in protein X-ray crystallography.

Authors:  Andrew H Van Benschoten; Lin Liu; Ana Gonzalez; Aaron S Brewster; Nicholas K Sauter; James S Fraser; Michael E Wall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Shining light on cysteine modification: connecting protein conformational dynamics to catalysis and regulation.

Authors:  Henry van den Bedem; Mark A Wilson
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 2.616

5.  Framework for Conducting and Analyzing Crystal Simulations of Nucleic Acids to Aid in Modern Force Field Evaluation.

Authors:  Şölen Ekesan; Darrin M York
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  ff14SB: Improving the Accuracy of Protein Side Chain and Backbone Parameters from ff99SB.

Authors:  James A Maier; Carmenza Martinez; Koushik Kasavajhala; Lauren Wickstrom; Kevin E Hauser; Carlos Simmerling
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 6.006

7.  Diffuse X-ray scattering from correlated motions in a protein crystal.

Authors:  Steve P Meisburger; David A Case; Nozomi Ando
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Validating Molecular Dynamics Simulations against Experimental Observables in Light of Underlying Conformational Ensembles.

Authors:  Matthew Carter Childers; Valerie Daggett
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Macromolecular Crystals.

Authors:  David S Cerutti; David A Case
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci       Date:  2018-11-16

Review 10.  Correlated Motions in Structural Biology.

Authors:  Da Xu; Steve P Meisburger; Nozomi Ando
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 3.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.