Literature DB >> 24452777

The effect of movement kinematics on predicting the timing of observed actions.

Lincoln J Colling1, William F Thompson, John Sutton.   

Abstract

The ability to predict the actions of other agents is vital for joint action tasks. Recent theory suggests that action prediction relies on an emulator system that permits observers to use a model of their own movement kinematics to predict the actions of other agents. If this is the case, then people should be more accurate at generating predictions about actions that are similar to their own. We tested this hypothesis in two experiments in which participants were required to predict the occurrence and timing of particular critical points in an observed action. In Experiment 1, we employed a self/other prediction paradigm in which prediction accuracy for recordings of self-generated movements was compared with prediction accuracy for recordings of other-generated movements. As expected, prediction was more accurate for recordings of self-generated actions because in this case the movement kinematics of the observer and observed stimuli are maximally similar. In Experiment 1, people were able to produce actions at their own tempo and, therefore, the results might be explained in terms of self-similarity in action production tempo rather than in terms of movement kinematics. To control for this possibility in Experiment 2, we compared prediction accuracy for stimuli that were matched in tempo but differed only in terms of kinematics. The results showed that participants were more accurate when predicting actions with a human kinematic profile than tempo-matched stimuli that moved with non-human kinematics. Finally, in Experiment 3, we confirmed that the results of Experiment 2 cannot be explained by human-like stimuli containing a slowing down phase before the critical points. Taken together, these findings provide further support for the role of motor emulation in action prediction, and they suggest that the action prediction mechanism produces output that is available rapidly and available to drive action control suggesting that it can plausibly support joint action coordination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24452777     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-3836-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  32 in total

1.  Absolute error revisited: an accuracy indicator in disguise.

Authors:  J A Spray
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 1.328

2.  Biological movements look uniform: evidence of motor-perceptual interactions.

Authors:  P Viviani; N Stucchi
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Motor execution affects action prediction.

Authors:  Anne Springer; Simone Brandstädter; Roman Liepelt; Teresa Birngruber; Martin Giese; Franz Mechsner; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Computational approaches to motor control.

Authors:  D M Wolpert
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 5.  Sensorimotor synchronization: a review of recent research (2006-2012).

Authors:  Bruno H Repp; Yi-Huang Su
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-06

6.  Prediction in joint action: what, when, and where.

Authors:  Natalie Sebanz; Guenther Knoblich
Journal:  Top Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-04

7.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory.

Authors:  R C Oldfield
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model.

Authors:  T Flash; N Hogan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Predicting the effects of actions: interactions of perception and action.

Authors:  G Knoblich; R Flach
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-11

10.  Joint drumming: social context facilitates synchronization in preschool children.

Authors:  Sebastian Kirschner; Michael Tomasello
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2008-09-12
View more
  5 in total

1.  Critical Motor Involvement in Prediction of Human and Non-biological Motion Trajectories.

Authors:  Matthieu M de Wit; Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.892

Review 2.  The Components of Interpersonal Synchrony in the Typical Population and in Autism: A Conceptual Analysis.

Authors:  Claire Bowsher-Murray; Sarah Gerson; Elisabeth von dem Hagen; Catherine R G Jones
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-06

3.  Beating time: How ensemble musicians' cueing gestures communicate beat position and tempo.

Authors:  Laura Bishop; Werner Goebl
Journal:  Psychol Music       Date:  2017-04-27

4.  Synchrony in Joint Action Is Directed by Each Participant's Motor Control System.

Authors:  Lior Noy; Netta Weiser; Jason Friedman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-04-10

5.  Entrainment and motor emulation approaches to joint action: Alternatives or complementary approaches?

Authors:  Lincoln J Colling; Kellie Williamson
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 3.169

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.