Literature DB >> 21477908

Motor execution affects action prediction.

Anne Springer1, Simone Brandstädter, Roman Liepelt, Teresa Birngruber, Martin Giese, Franz Mechsner, Wolfgang Prinz.   

Abstract

Previous studies provided evidence of the claim that the prediction of occluded action involves real-time simulation. We report two experiments that aimed to study how real-time simulation is affected by simultaneous action execution under conditions of full, partial or no overlap between observed and executed actions. This overlap was analysed by comparing the body sides and the movement kinematics involved in the observed and the executed action. While performing actions, participants observed point-light (PL) actions that were interrupted by an occluder, followed by a test pose. The task was to judge whether the test pose depicted a continuation of the occluded action in the same depth angle. Using a paradigm proposed by Graf et al., we independently manipulated the duration of the occluder and the temporal advance of the test pose relative to occlusion onset (occluder time and pose time, respectively). This paradigm allows the assessment of real-time simulation, based on prediction performance across different occluder time/pose time combinations (i.e., improved task performance with decreasing time distance between occluder time and pose time is taken to reflect real-time simulation). The PL actor could be perceived as from the front or back, as indicated by task instructions. In Experiment 1 (front view instructions), evidence of action simulation was obtained for partial overlap (i.e., observed and performed action corresponded either in body side or movement kinematics), but not for full or no overlap conditions. The same pattern was obtained in Experiment 2 (back view instructions), ruling out a spatial compatibility explanation for the real-time pattern observed. Our results suggest that motor processes affect action prediction and real-time simulation. The strength of their impact varies as a function of the overlap between observed and executed actions.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21477908     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  25 in total

1.  Long- and short-term plastic modeling of action prediction abilities in volleyball.

Authors:  Cosimo Urgesi; Maria Maddalena Savonitto; Franco Fabbro; Salvatore M Aglioti
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-11-02

2.  Action mirroring and action understanding: an ideomotor and attentional account.

Authors:  Markus Paulus
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-11-06

3.  Effects of feature integration in a hands-crossed version of the Social Simon paradigm.

Authors:  Roman Liepelt; Dorit Wenke; Rico Fischer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-02-17

4.  Simulating and predicting others' actions.

Authors:  Anne Springer; Antonia F de C Hamilton; Emily S Cross
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-06-17

5.  The effect of movement kinematics on predicting the timing of observed actions.

Authors:  Lincoln J Colling; William F Thompson; John Sutton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The role of appearance and motion in action prediction.

Authors:  Ayse Pinar Saygin; Waltraud Stadler
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-02-28

7.  Do experts see it in slow motion? Altered timing of action simulation uncovers domain-specific perceptual processing in expert athletes.

Authors:  Carmelo M Vicario; Stergios Makris; Cosimo Urgesi
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-09-07

8.  Before, during and after you disappear: aspects of timing and dynamic updating of the real-time action simulation of human motions.

Authors:  Jim Parkinson; Anne Springer; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-02-15

9.  The influence of visual training on predicting complex action sequences.

Authors:  Emily S Cross; Waltraud Stadler; Jim Parkinson; Simone Schütz-Bosbach; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  The role of cue-response mapping in motorvisual impairment and facilitation: evidence for different roles of action planning and action control in motorvisual dual-task priming.

Authors:  Roland Thomaschke; Brian Hopkins; R Christopher Miall
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.