Literature DB >> 24450678

The fisherman's cards: how to address past and future radiation exposures in clinical decision making.

Jonathan D Eisenberg1, Sarah O Lewin, Pari V Pandharipande.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to describe how to address patients' past-and future potential-radiation exposures when making an imaging decision in a given situation. CONCLUSION. The Biologic Effects of Ionizing Radiation committee has endorsed a linear no-threshold model to explain the relationship between radiation exposure and cancer risk. This model implies that past and future potential exposures should not impact current decisions. We present an analogy that deconstructs these counterintuitive conclusions and facilitates translation of key radiation risk principles to practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24450678      PMCID: PMC4174573          DOI: 10.2214/AJR.13.10896

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  13 in total

1.  Exposing exposure: automated anatomy-specific CT radiation exposure extraction for quality assurance and radiation monitoring.

Authors:  Aaron Sodickson; Graham I Warden; Cameron E Farkas; Ichiro Ikuta; Luciano M Prevedello; Katherine P Andriole; Ramin Khorasani
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Exposing exposure: enhancing patient safety through automated data mining of nuclear medicine reports for quality assurance and organ dose monitoring.

Authors:  Ichiro Ikuta; Aaron Sodickson; Elliot J Wasser; Graham I Warden; Victor H Gerbaudo; Ramin Khorasani
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  An automated DICOM database capable of arbitrary data mining (including radiation dose indicators) for quality monitoring.

Authors:  Shanshan Wang; William Pavlicek; Catherine C Roberts; Steve G Langer; Muhong Zhang; Mengqi Hu; Richard L Morin; Beth A Schueler; Clinton V Wellnitz; Teresa Wu
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Dose-effect relationship and estimation of the carcinogenic effects of low doses of ionizing radiation: the joint report of the Académie des Sciences (Paris) and of the Académie Nationale de Médecine.

Authors:  Maurice Tubiana
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Risks associated with low doses and low dose rates of ionizing radiation: why linearity may be (almost) the best we can do.

Authors:  Mark P Little; Richard Wakeford; E Janet Tawn; Simon D Bouffler; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  The linear no-threshold relationship is inconsistent with radiation biologic and experimental data.

Authors:  Maurice Tubiana; Ludwig E Feinendegen; Chichuan Yang; Joseph M Kaminski
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  A brief review of radiation hormesis.

Authors:  D Jolly; J Meyer
Journal:  Australas Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.430

Review 8.  Utilization strategies for cumulative dose estimates: a review and rational assessment.

Authors:  Daniel J Durand; Robert L Dixon; Richard L Morin
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 5.532

9.  Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Richard Doll; Dudley T Goodhead; Eric J Hall; Charles E Land; John B Little; Jay H Lubin; Dale L Preston; R Julian Preston; Jerome S Puskin; Elaine Ron; Rainer K Sachs; Jonathan M Samet; Richard B Setlow; Marco Zaider
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-11-10       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians.

Authors:  John D Mathews; Anna V Forsythe; Zoe Brady; Martin W Butler; Stacy K Goergen; Graham B Byrnes; Graham G Giles; Anthony B Wallace; Philip R Anderson; Tenniel A Guiver; Paul McGale; Timothy M Cain; James G Dowty; Adrian C Bickerstaffe; Sarah C Darby
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-05-21
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  From 'Image Gently' to image intelligently: a personalized perspective on diagnostic radiation risk.

Authors:  R Paul Guillerman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-10-11

Review 2.  Radiation risk issues in recurrent imaging.

Authors:  Charles Brower; Madan M Rehani
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 3.629

Review 3.  Radiation concerns in frequent flyer patients: should imaging history influence decisions about recurrent imaging?

Authors:  Aaron D Sodickson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 3.629

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.