RATIONALE: Transendocardial stem cell injection (TESI) with mesenchymal stem cells improves remodeling in chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy, but the effect of the injection site remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: To address whether TESI exerts its effects at the site of injection only or also in remote areas, we hypothesized that segmental myocardial scar and segmental ejection fraction improve to a greater extent in injected than in noninjected segments. METHODS AND RESULTS: Biplane ventriculographic and endocardial tracings were recorded. TESI was guided to 10 sites in infarct-border zones. Sites were mapped according to the 17-myocardial segment model. As a result, 510 segments were analyzed in 30 patients before and 13 months after TESI. Segmental early enhancement defect (a measure of scar size) was reduced by TESI in both injected (-43.7 ± 4.4%; n=95; P<0.01) and noninjected segments (-25.1 ± 7.8%; n=148; P<0.001; between-group comparison P<0.05). Conversely, segmental ejection fraction (a measure of contractile performance) improved in injected scar segments (19.9 ± 3.3-26.3 ± 3.5%; P=0.003) but not in noninjected scar segments (21.3 ± 2.6-23.5 ± 3.2%; P=0.20; between-group comparison P<0.05). Furthermore, segmental ejection fraction in injected scar segments improved to a greater degree in patients with baseline segmental ejection fraction <20% (12.1 ± 1.2-19.9 ± 2.7%; n=18; P=0.003), versus <20% (31.7 ± 3.4-35.5 ± 3.3%; n=12; P=0.33, between-group comparison P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: These findings illustrate a dichotomy in regional responses to TESI. Although scar size reduction was evident in all scar segments, scar size reduction and ventricular functional responses preferentially occurred at the sites of TESI versus non-TESI sites. Furthermore, improvement was greatest when segmental left ventricular dysfunction was severe.
RCT Entities:
RATIONALE: Transendocardial stem cell injection (TESI) with mesenchymal stem cells improves remodeling in chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy, but the effect of the injection site remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: To address whether TESI exerts its effects at the site of injection only or also in remote areas, we hypothesized that segmental myocardial scar and segmental ejection fraction improve to a greater extent in injected than in noninjected segments. METHODS AND RESULTS: Biplane ventriculographic and endocardial tracings were recorded. TESI was guided to 10 sites in infarct-border zones. Sites were mapped according to the 17-myocardial segment model. As a result, 510 segments were analyzed in 30 patients before and 13 months after TESI. Segmental early enhancement defect (a measure of scar size) was reduced by TESI in both injected (-43.7 ± 4.4%; n=95; P<0.01) and noninjected segments (-25.1 ± 7.8%; n=148; P<0.001; between-group comparison P<0.05). Conversely, segmental ejection fraction (a measure of contractile performance) improved in injected scar segments (19.9 ± 3.3-26.3 ± 3.5%; P=0.003) but not in noninjected scar segments (21.3 ± 2.6-23.5 ± 3.2%; P=0.20; between-group comparison P<0.05). Furthermore, segmental ejection fraction in injected scar segments improved to a greater degree in patients with baseline segmental ejection fraction <20% (12.1 ± 1.2-19.9 ± 2.7%; n=18; P=0.003), versus <20% (31.7 ± 3.4-35.5 ± 3.3%; n=12; P=0.33, between-group comparison P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: These findings illustrate a dichotomy in regional responses to TESI. Although scar size reduction was evident in all scar segments, scar size reduction and ventricular functional responses preferentially occurred at the sites of TESI versus non-TESI sites. Furthermore, improvement was greatest when segmental left ventricular dysfunction was severe.
Entities:
Keywords:
cells; magnetic resonance imaging; myocardial infarction; tomography
Authors: Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-01-29 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Albert C Lardo; Marco A S Cordeiro; Caterina Silva; Luciano C Amado; Richard T George; Anastasios P Saliaris; Karl H Schuleri; Veronica R Fernandes; Menekhem Zviman; Saman Nazarian; Henry R Halperin; Katherine C Wu; Joshua M Hare; Joao A C Lima Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-01-24 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Konstantinos E Hatzistergos; Henry Quevedo; Behzad N Oskouei; Qinghua Hu; Gary S Feigenbaum; Irene S Margitich; Ramesh Mazhari; Andrew J Boyle; Juan P Zambrano; Jose E Rodriguez; Raul Dulce; Pradip M Pattany; David Valdes; Concepcion Revilla; Alan W Heldman; Ian McNiece; Joshua M Hare Journal: Circ Res Date: 2010-07-29 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Adam R Williams; Barry Trachtenberg; Darcy L Velazquez; Ian McNiece; Peter Altman; Didier Rouy; Adam M Mendizabal; Pradip M Pattany; Gustavo A Lopera; Joel Fishman; Juan P Zambrano; Alan W Heldman; Joshua M Hare Journal: Circ Res Date: 2011-03-17 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Adam R Williams; Konstantinos E Hatzistergos; Benjamin Addicott; Fred McCall; Decio Carvalho; Viky Suncion; Azorides R Morales; Jose Da Silva; Mark A Sussman; Alan W Heldman; Joshua M Hare Journal: Circulation Date: 2012-12-05 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Samirah A Gomes; Erika B Rangel; Courtney Premer; Raul A Dulce; Yenong Cao; Victoria Florea; Wayne Balkan; Claudia O Rodrigues; Andrew V Schally; Joshua M Hare Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-01-03 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Alan W Heldman; Darcy L DiFede; Joel E Fishman; Juan P Zambrano; Barry H Trachtenberg; Vasileios Karantalis; Muzammil Mushtaq; Adam R Williams; Viky Y Suncion; Ian K McNiece; Eduard Ghersin; Victor Soto; Gustavo Lopera; Roberto Miki; Howard Willens; Robert Hendel; Raul Mitrani; Pradip Pattany; Gary Feigenbaum; Behzad Oskouei; John Byrnes; Maureen H Lowery; Julio Sierra; Mariesty V Pujol; Cindy Delgado; Phillip J Gonzalez; Jose E Rodriguez; Luiza Lima Bagno; Didier Rouy; Peter Altman; Cheryl Wong Po Foo; Jose da Silva; Erica Anderson; Richard Schwarz; Adam Mendizabal; Joshua M Hare Journal: JAMA Date: 2014-01-01 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Adam R Williams; Viky Y Suncion; Frederic McCall; Danny Guerra; Jacques Mather; Juan P Zambrano; Alan W Heldman; Joshua M Hare Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2013-05-17 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Vasileios Karantalis; Darcy L DiFede; Gary Gerstenblith; Si Pham; James Symes; Juan Pablo Zambrano; Joel Fishman; Pradip Pattany; Ian McNiece; John Conte; Steven Schulman; Katherine Wu; Ashish Shah; Elayne Breton; Janice Davis-Sproul; Richard Schwarz; Gary Feigenbaum; Muzammil Mushtaq; Viky Y Suncion; Albert C Lardo; Ivan Borrello; Adam Mendizabal; Tomer Z Karas; John Byrnes; Maureen Lowery; Alan W Heldman; Joshua M Hare Journal: Circ Res Date: 2014-02-24 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Victoria Florea; Sonia S Majid; Rosemeire M Kanashiro-Takeuchi; Ren-Zhi Cai; Norman L Block; Andrew V Schally; Joshua M Hare; Claudia O Rodrigues Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-11-17 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jeremy A Schaefer; Pilar A Guzman; Sonja B Riemenschneider; Timothy J Kamp; Robert T Tranquillo Journal: J Tissue Eng Regen Med Date: 2017-11-23 Impact factor: 3.963
Authors: Nikhil C Panda; Sean T Zuckerman; Olurotimi O Mesubi; David S Rosenbaum; Marc S Penn; J Kevin Donahue; Eben Alsberg; Kenneth R Laurita Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2014-09-19 Impact factor: 1.900