Literature DB >> 24449012

Spontaneous postural sway predicts the strength of smooth vection.

Stephen Palmisano1, Deborah Apthorp, Takeharu Seno, Paul J Stapley.   

Abstract

This study asked whether individual differences in the influence of vision on postural stability could be used to predict the strength of subsequently induced visual illusions of self-motion (vection). In the experiment, we first measured spontaneous postural sway while subjects stood erect for 60 s with their eyes both open and both closed. We then showed our subjects two types of self-motion display: radially expanding optic flow (simulating constant velocity forwards self-motion) and vertically oscillating radially expanding optic flow (simulating constant velocity forwards self-motion combined with vertical head oscillation). As expected, subjects swayed more with their eyes closed (compared to open) and experienced more compelling illusions of self-motion with vertically oscillating (as opposed to smooth) radial flow. The extent to which participants relied on vision for postural stability-measured as the ratio of sway with eyes closed compared to that with eyes open-was found to predict vection strength. However, this was only the case for displays representing smooth self-motion. It seems that for oscillating displays, other factors, such as visual-vestibular interactions, may be more important.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24449012     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-3835-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  28 in total

1.  Postural adjustment response to depth direction moving patterns produced by virtual reality graphics.

Authors:  S Kuno; T Kawakita; O Kawakami; Y Miyake; S Watanabe
Journal:  Jpn J Physiol       Date:  1999-10

2.  Romberg's sign expressed in a quotient.

Authors:  J A van Parys; C J Njiokiktjien
Journal:  Agressologie       Date:  1976

3.  Postural instability precedes motion sickness.

Authors:  T A Stoffregen; L J Smart
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  1998-11-15       Impact factor: 4.077

4.  Additional oscillation can facilitate visually induced self-motion perception: the effects of its coherence and amplitude gradient.

Authors:  Shinji Nakamura
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Visual control of posture in real and virtual environments.

Authors:  Jonatran W Kelly; Bernhard Riecke; Jack M Loomis; Andrew C Beall
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2008-01

6.  Effects of additional visual oscillation on vection under voluntary eye movement conditions--retinal image motion is critical in vection facilitation.

Authors:  Shinji Nakamura
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Body load and the postural precursors of motion sickness.

Authors:  Frank C Koslucher; Eric J Haaland; Thomas A Stoffregen
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 2.840

8.  Simulated angular head oscillation enhances vection in depth.

Authors:  Juno Kim; Stephen Palmisano; Frederick Bonato
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Flow structure versus retinal location in the optical control of stance.

Authors:  T A Stoffregen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Postural instability and motion sickness in a virtual moving room.

Authors:  Sébastien J Villard; Moira B Flanagan; Gina M Albanese; Thomas A Stoffregen
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.888

View more
  11 in total

1.  The Shepard-Risset glissando: music that moves you.

Authors:  Rebecca A Mursic; Bernhard E Riecke; Deborah Apthorp; Stephen Palmisano
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Predicting vection and visually induced motion sickness based on spontaneous postural activity.

Authors:  Stephen Palmisano; Benjamin Arcioni; Paul J Stapley
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Vection and visually induced motion sickness: how are they related?

Authors:  Behrang Keshavarz; Bernhard E Riecke; Lawrence J Hettinger; Jennifer L Campos
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-20

4.  Comparing the effectiveness of different displays in enhancing illusions of self-movement (vection).

Authors:  Bernhard E Riecke; Jacqueline D Jordan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-01

5.  Chaos in balance: non-linear measures of postural control predict individual variations in visual illusions of motion.

Authors:  Deborah Apthorp; Fintan Nagle; Stephen Palmisano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Future challenges for vection research: definitions, functional significance, measures, and neural bases.

Authors:  Stephen Palmisano; Robert S Allison; Mark M Schira; Robert J Barry
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-27

7.  The Oscillating Potential Model of Visually Induced Vection.

Authors:  Takeharu Seno; Ken-Ichi Sawai; Hidetoshi Kanaya; Toshihiro Wakebe; Masaki Ogawa; Yoshitaka Fujii; Stephen Palmisano
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-11-24

Review 8.  Ageing vision and falls: a review.

Authors:  Liana Nafisa Saftari; Oh-Sang Kwon
Journal:  J Physiol Anthropol       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 2.867

9.  Larger Head Displacement to Optic Flow Presented in the Lower Visual Field.

Authors:  Kanon Fujimoto; Hiroshi Ashida
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2019-11-22

10.  Estimating the sensorimotor components of cybersickness.

Authors:  Séamas Weech; Jessy Parokaran Varghese; Michael Barnett-Cowan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.