Literature DB >> 24448594

Influences of interpolation error, electrode geometry, and the electrode-tissue interface on models of electric fields produced by deep brain stimulation.

Bryan Howell, Sagar Naik, Warren M Grill.   

Abstract

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established therapy for movement disorders, but the fundamental mechanisms by which DBS has its effects remain unknown. Computational models can provide insights into the mechanisms of DBS, but to be useful, the models must have sufficient detail to predict accurately the electric fields produced by DBS. We used a finite-element method model of the Medtronic 3387 electrode array, coupled to cable models of myelinated axons, to quantify how interpolation errors, electrode geometry, and the electrode-tissue interface affect calculation of electrical potentials and stimulation thresholds for populations of model nerve fibers. Convergence of the potentials was not a sufficient criterion for ensuring the same degree of accuracy in subsequent determination of stimulation thresholds, because the accuracy of the stimulation thresholds depended on the order of the elements. Simplifying the 3387 electrode array by ignoring the inactive contacts and extending the terminated end of the shaft had position-dependent effects on the potentials and excitation thresholds, and these simplifications may impact correlations between DBS parameters and clinical outcomes. When the current density in the bulk tissue is uniform, the effect of the electrode-tissue interface impedance could be approximated by filtering the potentials calculated with a static lumped electrical equivalent circuit. Further, for typical DBS parameters during voltage-regulated stimulation, it was valid to approximate the electrode as an ideal polarized electrode with a nonlinear capacitance. Validation of these computational considerations enables accurate modeling of the electric field produced by DBS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24448594      PMCID: PMC4042398          DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2013.2292025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  37 in total

1.  High-frequency stimulation produces a transient blockade of voltage-gated currents in subthalamic neurons.

Authors:  C Beurrier; B Bioulac; J Audin; C Hammond
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  No tissue damage by chronic deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  C Haberler; F Alesch; P R Mazal; P Pilz; K Jellinger; M M Pinter; J A Hainfellner; H Budka
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 10.422

3.  Patient-specific analysis of the volume of tissue activated during deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Christopher R Butson; Scott E Cooper; Jaimie M Henderson; Cameron C McIntyre
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-11-17       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression.

Authors:  Helen S Mayberg; Andres M Lozano; Valerie Voon; Heather E McNeely; David Seminowicz; Clement Hamani; Jason M Schwalb; Sidney H Kennedy
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 5.  Deep brain stimulation reduces symptoms of Parkinson disease.

Authors:  E B Montgomery
Journal:  Cleve Clin J Med       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.321

6.  Influence of uncertainties in the material properties of brain tissue on the probabilistic volume of tissue activated.

Authors:  Christian Schmidt; Peadar Grant; Madeleine Lowery; Ursula van Rienen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  A quantitative description of membrane currents in rabbit myelinated nerve.

Authors:  S Y Chiu; J M Ritchie; R B Rogart; D Stagg
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 8.  Deep brain stimulation for psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Jens Kuhn; Theo O J Gründler; Doris Lenartz; Volker Sturm; Joachim Klosterkötter; Wolfgang Huff
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 5.594

9.  Patient-specific models of deep brain stimulation: influence of field model complexity on neural activation predictions.

Authors:  Ashutosh Chaturvedi; Christopher R Butson; Scott F Lempka; Scott E Cooper; Cameron C McIntyre
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 8.955

10.  The peri-electrode space is a significant element of the electrode-brain interface in deep brain stimulation: a computational study.

Authors:  Nada Yousif; Richard Bayford; Peter G Bain; Xuguang Liu
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 4.077

View more
  18 in total

1.  Design and in vivo evaluation of more efficient and selective deep brain stimulation electrodes.

Authors:  Bryan Howell; Brian Huynh; Warren M Grill
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Evaluation of high-perimeter electrode designs for deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Bryan Howell; Warren M Grill
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Stimulation Efficiency With Decaying Exponential Waveforms in a Wirelessly Powered Switched-Capacitor Discharge Stimulation System.

Authors:  Hyung-Min Lee; Bryan Howell; Warren M Grill; Maysam Ghovanloo
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Modeling the response of small myelinated axons in a compound nerve to kilohertz frequency signals.

Authors:  N A Pelot; C E Behrend; W M Grill
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  Characterization of the stimulus waveforms generated by implantable pulse generators for deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Scott F Lempka; Bryan Howell; Kabilar Gunalan; Andre G Machado; Cameron C McIntyre
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  Analyzing the tradeoff between electrical complexity and accuracy in patient-specific computational models of deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Bryan Howell; Cameron C McIntyre
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 5.379

7.  Quantifying axonal responses in patient-specific models of subthalamic deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Kabilar Gunalan; Bryan Howell; Cameron C McIntyre
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Visualization of electrical field of electrode using voltage-controlled fluorescence release.

Authors:  Wenyan Jia; Jiamin Wu; Di Gao; Hao Wang; Mingui Sun
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 4.589

9.  Effects of frequency-dependent membrane capacitance on neural excitability.

Authors:  Bryan Howell; Leonel E Medina; Warren M Grill
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 10.  Neuromodulation for mood and memory: from the engineering bench to the patient bedside.

Authors:  Zhi-De Deng; Shawn M McClintock; Nicodemus E Oey; Bruce Luber; Sarah H Lisanby
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 6.627

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.