Bryan Howell1, Warren M Grill. 1. Duke University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Durham, NC, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment for movement disorders and a promising therapy for treating epilepsy and psychiatric disorders. Despite its clinical success, complications including infections and mis-programing following surgical replacement of the battery-powered implantable pulse generator adversely impact the safety profile of this therapy. We sought to decrease power consumption and extend battery life by modifying the electrode geometry to increase stimulation efficiency. The specific goal of this study was to determine whether electrode contact perimeter or area had a greater effect on increasing stimulation efficiency. APPROACH: Finite-element method (FEM) models of eight prototype electrode designs were used to calculate the electrode access resistance, and the FEM models were coupled with cable models of passing axons to quantify stimulation efficiency. We also measured in vitro the electrical properties of the prototype electrode designs and measured in vivo the stimulation efficiency following acute implantation in anesthetized cats. MAIN RESULTS: Area had a greater effect than perimeter on altering the electrode access resistance; electrode (access or dynamic) resistance alone did not predict stimulation efficiency because efficiency was dependent on the shape of the potential distribution in the tissue; and, quantitative assessment of stimulation efficiency required consideration of the effects of the electrode-tissue interface impedance. SIGNIFICANCE: These results advance understanding of the features of electrode geometry that are important for designing the next generation of efficient DBS electrodes.
OBJECTIVE: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment for movement disorders and a promising therapy for treating epilepsy and psychiatric disorders. Despite its clinical success, complications including infections and mis-programing following surgical replacement of the battery-powered implantable pulse generator adversely impact the safety profile of this therapy. We sought to decrease power consumption and extend battery life by modifying the electrode geometry to increase stimulation efficiency. The specific goal of this study was to determine whether electrode contact perimeter or area had a greater effect on increasing stimulation efficiency. APPROACH: Finite-element method (FEM) models of eight prototype electrode designs were used to calculate the electrode access resistance, and the FEM models were coupled with cable models of passing axons to quantify stimulation efficiency. We also measured in vitro the electrical properties of the prototype electrode designs and measured in vivo the stimulation efficiency following acute implantation in anesthetized cats. MAIN RESULTS: Area had a greater effect than perimeter on altering the electrode access resistance; electrode (access or dynamic) resistance alone did not predict stimulation efficiency because efficiency was dependent on the shape of the potential distribution in the tissue; and, quantitative assessment of stimulation efficiency required consideration of the effects of the electrode-tissue interface impedance. SIGNIFICANCE: These results advance understanding of the features of electrode geometry that are important for designing the next generation of efficient DBS electrodes.
Authors: Helen S Mayberg; Andres M Lozano; Valerie Voon; Heather E McNeely; David Seminowicz; Clement Hamani; Jason M Schwalb; Sidney H Kennedy Journal: Neuron Date: 2005-03-03 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Michael S Okun; Michele Tagliati; Michael Pourfar; Hubert H Fernandez; Ramon L Rodriguez; Ron L Alterman; Kelly D Foote Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2005-06-13
Authors: Jens Kuhn; Theo O J Gründler; Doris Lenartz; Volker Sturm; Joachim Klosterkötter; Wolfgang Huff Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2010-02-19 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Lauri J Lehto; Julia P Slopsema; Matthew D Johnson; Artem Shatillo; Benjamin A Teplitzky; Lynn Utecht; Gregor Adriany; Silvia Mangia; Alejandra Sierra; Walter C Low; Olli Gröhn; Shalom Michaeli Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2017-01-09 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: Julia P Slopsema; Edgar Peña; Remi Patriat; Lauri J Lehto; Olli Gröhn; Silvia Mangia; Noam Harel; Shalom Michaeli; Matthew D Johnson Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2018-08-10 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: Clayton S Bingham; Kyle Loizos; Gene J Yu; Andrew Gilbert; Jean-Marie C Bouteiller; Dong Song; Gianluca Lazzi; Theodore W Berger Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2018-01-25 Impact factor: 4.538