OBJECTIVE: The study was designed to measure dynamic visual acuity (DVA) during head movement as an assessment of the functional impact of vestibular deficits. STUDY DESIGN: The study design was a prospective, clinical study. SETTING: The study was performed in a tertiary, ambulatory referral center. PATIENTS: Forty-two normal subjects, 29 patients with unilateral vestibular loss, and 26 patients with bilateral vestibular hypofunction who were 19-87 years of age were examined. INTERVENTION: Diagnostic intervention was performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Main outcome measures included the reliability, sensitivity, and specificity of a computerized test that measures visual acuity during head movement in normal subjects and in patients with vestibular deficits. RESULTS: The computerized DVA test was reliable in both normal subjects (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] r=0.87) and in patients with vestibular deficits (ICC r=0.83). The sensitivity of the DVA test was 94.5% and the specificity was 95.2%. The positive predictive value (individuals who test positive on the DVA test who will have a vestibular deficit) was 96.3%. The negative predictive value (individuals who test negative on the DVA test who will not have a vestibular deficit) was 93%. CONCLUSIONS: The computerized DVA test is reliable and is able to distinguish among normal subjects and patients with vestibular deficits.
OBJECTIVE: The study was designed to measure dynamic visual acuity (DVA) during head movement as an assessment of the functional impact of vestibular deficits. STUDY DESIGN: The study design was a prospective, clinical study. SETTING: The study was performed in a tertiary, ambulatory referral center. PATIENTS: Forty-two normal subjects, 29 patients with unilateral vestibular loss, and 26 patients with bilateral vestibular hypofunction who were 19-87 years of age were examined. INTERVENTION: Diagnostic intervention was performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Main outcome measures included the reliability, sensitivity, and specificity of a computerized test that measures visual acuity during head movement in normal subjects and in patients with vestibular deficits. RESULTS: The computerized DVA test was reliable in both normal subjects (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] r=0.87) and in patients with vestibular deficits (ICC r=0.83). The sensitivity of the DVA test was 94.5% and the specificity was 95.2%. The positive predictive value (individuals who test positive on the DVA test who will have a vestibular deficit) was 96.3%. The negative predictive value (individuals who test negative on the DVA test who will not have a vestibular deficit) was 93%. CONCLUSIONS: The computerized DVA test is reliable and is able to distinguish among normal subjects and patients with vestibular deficits.
Authors: Rose Marie Rine; Dale Roberts; Bree A Corbin; Roberta McKean-Cowdin; Rohit Varma; Jennifer Beaumont; Jerry Slotkin; Michael C Schubert Journal: J Rehabil Res Dev Date: 2012
Authors: Michael C Schubert; Americo A Migliaccio; Richard A Clendaniel; Amir Allak; John P Carey Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Rosemarie M Rine; Michael C Schubert; Susan L Whitney; Dale Roberts; Mark S Redfern; Mark C Musolino; Jennica L Roche; Daniel P Steed; Bree Corbin; Chia-Cheng Lin; Greg F Marchetti; Jennifer Beaumont; John P Carey; Neil P Shepard; Gary P Jacobson; Diane M Wrisley; Howard J Hoffman; Gabriel Furman; Jerry Slotkin Journal: Neurology Date: 2013-03-12 Impact factor: 9.910