Literature DB >> 24445787

[Mechanical versus biological heart valves].

J Ennker1, A Lauruschkat.   

Abstract

Since the first successful heart valve replacement procedures were performed in the 1950s, a multitude of different heart valves have been developed and implanted. This review offers a structured overview of the most important mechanical and biological heart valves with special regard to the individual indications of mechanical versus biological heart valve replacement and to possible postoperative complications.

Year:  2001        PMID： 24445787     DOI： 10.1007/s003920170007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Kardiol        ISSN： 0300-5860


  54 in total

1.  Homograft replacement of the aortic valve.

Authors:  D N ROSS
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1962-09-08       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Late prosthetic valve endocarditis. Immediate and long-term prognosis.

Authors:  P Tornos; E Sanz; G Permanyer-Miralda; B Almirante; A M Planes; J Soler-Soler
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  Treatment of endocarditis with valve replacement: the question of tissue versus mechanical prosthesis.

Authors:  M R Moon; D C Miller; K A Moore; P E Oyer; R S Mitchell; R C Robbins; E B Stinson; N E Shumway; B A Reitz
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Aortic valve replacement with or without concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting in the ninth decade of life.

Authors:  J Ennker; A Mortasawi; S Gehle; M Yaghmaie; T Schröder; U Rosendahl; I C Ennker
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Thrombotic obstruction of the Björk-Shiley valve: the Glasgow experience.

Authors:  S J Ryder; H Bradley; J J Brannan; M A Turner; W H Bain
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 9.139

6.  Frequency and severity of intravascular hemolysis after left-sided cardiac valve replacement with Medtronic Hall and St. Jude Medical prostheses, and influence of prosthetic type, position, size and number.

Authors:  J Skoularigis; M R Essop; D Skudicky; S J Middlemost; P Sareli
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1993-03-01       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Thrombosis of mechanical cardiac valves: a qualitative comparison of the silastic ball valve and the tilting disc valve.

Authors:  M T Metzdorff; G L Grunkemeier; C W Pinson; A Starr
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 8.  Thromboembolic and bleeding complications in patients with mechanical heart valve prostheses.

Authors:  S C Cannegieter; F R Rosendaal; E Briët
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Risk of strut fracture of Björk-Shiley valves.

Authors:  Y van der Graaf; F de Waard; L A van Herwerden; J Defauw
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-02-01       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Paraprosthetic leak: a complication of cardiac valve replacement.

Authors:  A Jindani; E M Neville; G Venn; B T Williams
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.888
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.