Literature DB >> 11466569

Aortic valve replacement with or without concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting in the ninth decade of life.

J Ennker1, A Mortasawi, S Gehle, M Yaghmaie, T Schröder, U Rosendahl, I C Ennker.   

Abstract

Due to demographic changes in average life expectancy, the age of patients undergoing cardiac surgery is increasing. We have reviewed the short- and long-term outcome after aortic valve replacement with or without concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting in patients over 80 years of age. From 1 January 1995 until 30 June 1999, 114 patients (83 women and 31 men, 80-89 years of age, 82.8+/-2.4 years) with symptomatic aortic valve disease underwent aortic valve replacement. Of these patients, 54% (group A) received isolated valve replacement and 46% (group B) underwent myocardial revascularization as well. The perioperative mortality rate was 4.8% for group A and 7.7% for group B. The 30-day hospital mortality rate was 4.8% for group A and 15.4% for group B. The follow-up time ranged between 3 months and 63 months (32+/-15 months). None of the patients had to be reoperated for prosthetic valve dysfunction or endocarditis. Bleeding complications due to anticoagulation therapy were not observed. Of the 15 deaths during the follow-up period, seven (47%) were cardiac in nature and two (13%) were related to stroke. Actuarial survival rates for group A were 90%, 84%, and 76% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively, and for group B were 75%, 71%, and 68%. One year after the operation, permanent nursing care was not required by 100% of patients in group A (2 years, 98%; 3 years, 95%) and by 100% of patients in group B (2 years, 95%; 3 years, 91%). At a 1-year interval after the operation, 98% of patients in group A had not been hospitalized as a result of cardiac disorders (2 years, 98%; 3 years, 95%). The rates for group B were 90%, 85%, and 85%. Compared with younger age groups, aortic valve replacement in patients 80 years of age and older is associated with a distinctly increased mortality and morbidity. However, our data suggest that, considering the poor prognosis of conservative therapy of symptomatic aortic valve disease, functional status as well as life expectancy in this age group seem to be positively influenced by aortic valve replacement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11466569     DOI: 10.1007/s004230100221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  4 in total

1.  [Mechanical versus biological heart valves].

Authors:  J Ennker; A Lauruschkat
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2001-12

2.  [Perioperative complications after heart valve replacement].

Authors:  U Rosendahl; I C Ennker; A Albert; S Bauer; A Mortasawi; K Bauer; F Dalladaku; J Bories; J Ennker
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2001-12

3.  Combined cardiac surgical procedures in octogenarians: operative outcome.

Authors:  H Gulbins; A Malkoc; J Ennker
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 5.460

4.  The early and long-term outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting added to aortic valve replacement compared to isolated aortic valve replacement in elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stefano D'Alessandro; Domenico Tuttolomondo; Gurmeet Singh; Daniel Hernandez-Vaquero; Claudia Pattuzzi; Alan Gallingani; Francesco Maestri; Francesco Nicolini; Francesco Formica
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 1.814

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.