Literature DB >> 1346279

Risk of strut fracture of Björk-Shiley valves.

Y van der Graaf1, F de Waard, L A van Herwerden, J Defauw.   

Abstract

The incidence of and factors that predispose to outlet strut fracture of Björk-Shiley heart valves are still not known. To obtain such information a retrospective cohort study was conducted on all 2303 patients in the Netherlands with a 60 degrees convexo-concave (60 degrees CC) or a 70 degrees convexo-concave (70 degrees CC) Björk-Shiley heart valve. Patients have been followed-up for a mean of 6.6 years (range 1-4271 days). 42 cases of mechanical failure due to outlet strut fracture have been recorded-6 of the 7 patients with fracture of the aortic valve died, as did 18 of the 35 patients with fracture of the mitral valve. Multivariate analysis identified wide opening angle (70 degrees), large valve size (greater than or equal to 29 mm diameter), and young age (less than 50 years) as risk factors for outlet strut fracture. For large 70 degrees CC mitral valves the cumulative risk of outlet strut fracture after 8 years was 17.4% (95% CI 9.1-31.6). Unlike previous findings, this excessive risk applied to late as well as to early batches of valves. In patients with a large 60 degrees CC mitral valve the cumulative risk after 8 years was 4.2% (95% CI 2.7-6.5). The incidence rate of outlet strut fracture in 60 degrees CC and 70 degrees CC valves (aortic and mitral) was constant over time. Overall survival since implantation was better for patients with 60 degrees CC prostheses than for those with 70 degrees CC prostheses; the adjusted hazard ratio for mortality for patients receiving a 70 degrees CC prosthesis was 1.5 (95% CI 1.1-2.0). Together with the low (24%) necropsy rate, this ratio suggests that the reported incidence of strut fracture for the 70 degrees CC valves is an underestimate. The data indicate that prophylactic replacement of 60 degrees CC and 70 degrees CC valves is advisable for selected groups of patients. Since the case-fatality rate is 50% for emergency replacement of faulty valves, patients suspected of Björk-Shiley heart-valve failure should be referred without delay to a cardiothoracic centre.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1346279     DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)91328-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  13 in total

1.  Cohort survey of heart valve replacement patients: does the valve card scheme have room for improvement?

Authors:  M B Edwards; K M Taylor
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-08-25

2.  Outlet strut fracture of Björk-Shiley convexo concave heart valves: the UK cohort study.

Authors:  R Z Omar; L S Morton; D A Halliday; E M Danns; M T Beirne; W J Blot; K M Taylor
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Management of patients with Björk-Shiley prosthetic valves.

Authors:  D Lindblom
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1992-08

4.  Welder identity, weld date, and the risk of outlet strut fracture in Björk-Shiley convexo-concave valves: the Dutch cohort study.

Authors:  M Kallewaard; A Algra; Y van der Graaf
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  [Mechanical versus biological heart valves].

Authors:  J Ennker; A Lauruschkat
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2001-12

Review 6.  Technology assessment in healthcare: a means for pursuing the goals of biomedical engineering.

Authors:  C S Goodman
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Psychological distress among recipients of Björk-Shiley convexo-concave valves: the impact of information.

Authors:  M Kallewaard; J Defauw; Y van der Graaf
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  Importance of emergency identification schemes.

Authors:  L Morton; S Murad; R Z Omar; K Taylor
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.740

9.  Prophylactic replacement of Björk-Shiley convexo-concave heart valves: an easy-to-use tool to aid decision-making in individual patients.

Authors:  E W Steyerberg; J H van der Meulen; L A van Herwerden; J D Habbema
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.994

10.  Complete detachment of an aortic valve prosthesis 10 years after implantation.

Authors:  P Grubwieser; M Pavlic; D Hoefer; W Rabl
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2003-10-22       Impact factor: 2.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.