Literature DB >> 24442553

Upper molar distalization with skeletally anchored TopJet appliance.

Bernhard C Pseiner1, Anne Wunderlich, Josef W Freudenthaler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively investigate clinical outcomes with the TopJet appliance.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Measurements were taken on dental casts reflecting situations in 15 patients aged 10-48 years before and after orthodontic treatment with a TopJet appliance. Each measurement was taken with a digital caliper and repeated 2 weeks later. Recorded parameters included the amounts of distalization achieved, durations of active treatment to calculate rates of tooth movement, as well as rotational and transversal changes involved in the distalization of upper first molars. Student's t-test was used to compare mean values (α=0.05), explorative analysis to distinguish between unilateral and bilateral use of TopJet appliances, and Pearsons's correlation coefficient to determine intraobserver variability.
RESULTS: Over a mean treatment duration of 5.9 months, the upper first molars were distalized by 4.0 ± 2.2 mm, including a mean tooth movement rate of 0.8 ± 0.6 mm per month. The rotational changes involved in the movements (-1.4 ± 6.7°) were not statistically significant. Transversal changes were 0.9 ± 1.2 mm at the level of the mesiobuccal cusps, 1.1 ± 1.1 mm at the central fossae, and 0.9 ± 0.9 mm at the distobuccal cusps. All measurements, other than those for rotation (r=0.7), were highly reproducible. Bilateral use of the appliance resulted in greater distalization than unilateral use, the mean difference being 1.4 mm. Bilateral use was more likely to involve inward rotation (+2.0°) on the mesial aspect of the first molars, whereas unilateral use resulted in mild outward rotation (-0.5°).
CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that upper molars can be distalized effectively and efficiently with TopJet appliances. Any degrees of rotation and transversal changes that the first molars undergo during this process do not seem to play a major role.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24442553     DOI: 10.1007/s00056-013-0189-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orofac Orthop        ISSN: 1434-5293            Impact factor:   1.938


  16 in total

1.  The distal jet for upper molar distalization.

Authors:  A Carano; M Testa
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  1996-07

Review 2.  Innovative anchorage alternatives for molar distalization--an overview.

Authors:  Gero Kinzinger; Heinrich Wehrbein; Friedrich K Byloff; Faruk Yildizhan; Peter Diedrich
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.938

Review 3.  The use of miniscrew implants for temporary skeletal anchorage in orthodontics: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Moschos A Papadopoulos; Fadi Tarawneh
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2007-02-21

Review 4.  Maxillary molar distalization with noncompliance intramaxillary appliances in Class II malocclusion. A systematic review.

Authors:  Gregory Stylianos Antonarakis; Stavros Kiliaridis
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Efficiency of a skeletonized distal jet appliance supported by miniscrew anchorage for noncompliance maxillary molar distalization.

Authors:  Gero S M Kinzinger; Norbert Gülden; Faruk Yildizhan; Peter R Diedrich
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Application and effectiveness of the Beneslider: a device to move molars distally.

Authors:  Benedict Wilmes; Dieter Drescher
Journal:  World J Orthod       Date:  2010

7.  Development of a new device for maxillary molar distalization with high pseudoelastic forces to overcome slider friction: the Longslider--a modification of the Beneslider.

Authors:  Ulrich J J Longerich; Matthias Thurau; Andreas Kolk
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol       Date:  2012-11-23

8.  Distal movement of maxillary molars in nongrowing patients with the skeletal anchorage system.

Authors:  Junji Sugawara; Reiko Kanzaki; Ichiro Takahashi; Hiroshi Nagasaka; Ravindra Nanda
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  Orthodontic treatment of Class II malocclusion with miniscrew implants.

Authors:  Moschos A Papadopoulos
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  Five-year experience with orthodontic miniscrew implants: a retrospective investigation of factors influencing success rates.

Authors:  Joanna Antoszewska; Moschos A Papadopoulos; Hyo-Sang Park; Björn Ludwig
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.650

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.