Literature DB >> 21490998

Application and effectiveness of the Beneslider: a device to move molars distally.

Benedict Wilmes1, Dieter Drescher.   

Abstract

AIM: Distal movement of maxillary molars is a reasonable but often challenging treatment alternative for patients with a dental Class II occlusion and an increased overjet or anterior crowding. One problem is that most of the conventional noncompliance devices that distally move maxillary molars lead to some anchorage loss. As such, a new appliance was designed that is connected to two coupled mini-implants with exchangeable abutments. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of this system for distal movement and the extent of its adverse effects.
METHODS: Maxillary molar distal movement was performed in 18 patients (10 females, eight males) in 6 to 10 months. The appliance (Beneslider) combined elements of the distal jet and Keles slider with two abutment mini-implants (spider screws or Benefit mini-implants). Pre- and posttreatment casts were scanned with cone beam computed tomography. To assess the amount of molar distal movement, molar rotation and transverse expansion the 3D scans were digitally superimposed. Lateral cephalograms were used to measure molar tipping.
RESULTS: The mean distal movement of the first molars amounted to 4.6 ± 1.5 mm, the mean mesial rotation to 3.4 ± 2.0 degrees, the transverse expansion in the first molar region to 1.9 ± 1.0 mm, and the distal tipping to 1.9 ± 1.3 degrees.
CONCLUSION: Two coupled mini-implants with exchangeable abutments and a heavy wire were an effective way to bodily move maxillary molars distally.
© 2010 BY QUINTESSENCE PUBLISHING CO, INC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21490998

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Orthod        ISSN: 1530-5678


  7 in total

1.  Upper molar distalization with skeletally anchored TopJet appliance.

Authors:  Bernhard C Pseiner; Anne Wunderlich; Josef W Freudenthaler
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-01-19       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Insertion torque values and success rates for paramedian insertion of orthodontic mini-implants : A retrospective study.

Authors:  Bruno Di Leonardo; Björn Ludwig; Jörg Alexander Lisson; Luca Contardo; Rossano Mura; Jan Hourfar
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Treatment efficiency of mini-implant-borne distalization depending on age and second-molar eruption.

Authors:  M Nienkemper; B Wilmes; A Pauls; S Yamaguchi; B Ludwig; D Drescher
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-03-02       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Correction of Class II, Division 2 malocclusions using a completely customized lingual appliance and the Herbst device.

Authors:  Julius Vu; Hans Pancherz; Rainer Schwestka-Polly; Dirk Wiechmann
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  An interview with Giorgio Fiorelli.

Authors:  Giorgio Fiorelli; Gidalti Bueno Linhares; Maurício Tatsuei Sakima; Renato Parsekian Martins; Wislei de Oliveira
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2018 Sep-Oct

6.  Class II correction by maxillary en masse distalization using a completely customized lingual appliance and a novel mini-screw anchorage concept - preliminary results.

Authors:  Frauke Beyling; Elisabeth Klang; Eva Niehoff; Rainer Schwestka-Polly; Hans-Joachim Helms; Dirk Wiechmann
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 2.151

7.  Mini-implants in the palatal slope--a retrospective analysis of implant survival and tissue reaction.

Authors:  Thomas Ziebura; Stefanie Flieger; Dirk Wiechmann
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 2.151

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.