Literature DB >> 19815162

Efficiency of a skeletonized distal jet appliance supported by miniscrew anchorage for noncompliance maxillary molar distalization.

Gero S M Kinzinger1, Norbert Gülden, Faruk Yildizhan, Peter R Diedrich.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Conventional anchorage appliances rely exclusively on intraoral anchorage for noncompliance molar distalization. The partial coverage of the palate, in particular, often results in compromised oral hygiene. An innovative alternative combines a skeletonized distal jet appliance with 2 paramedian miniscrews for additional anchorage. The objectives of this study were to investigate the suitability of the skeletonized distal jet for translatory molar distalization and to check the quality of the supporting anchorage setup.
METHODS: Two paramedian miniscrews (length, 8-9 mm; diameter, 1.6 mm) were placed into the anterior area of the palate in 10 patients. Skeletonized distal jet appliances fitted with composite to the first premolars and the collars of the miniscrews were used for bilateral molar distalization, and the coil springs were activated with a distalization force of 200 cN on each side.
RESULTS: The study confirmed the suitability of the appliance for translatory molar distalization (3.92 +/- 0.53 mm) with slight mesial inward rotation (on average, 8.35 degrees +/- 7.66 degrees and 7.88 degrees +/- 5.50 degrees ). The forces acting reciprocally on the anchorage setup were largely absorbed by the anchorage unit involving 2 anchorage teeth and 2 miniscrews. Significant anchorage loss, in the form of first premolar mesialization of 0.72 +/- 0.78 mm, was found.
CONCLUSIONS: The skeletonized distal jet appliance supported by additional miniscrew anchorage allows translatory molar distalization. Although the anchorage design combining 2 miniscrews at a paramedian location and the periodontium of 2 anchorage teeth does not offer the quality of stationary anchorage, it achieves greater molar distalization in total sagittal movement than conventional anchorage designs with an acrylic button.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19815162     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.10.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  23 in total

1.  Class II treatment by palatal miniscrew-system appliance: A case report.

Authors:  Luca Lombardo; Giulia Occhiuto; Emanuele Paoletto; Bortolo Giuliano Maino; Giuseppe Siciliani
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Upper molar distalization with skeletally anchored TopJet appliance.

Authors:  Bernhard C Pseiner; Anne Wunderlich; Josef W Freudenthaler
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-01-19       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Maxillary molar distalization with miniscrew-supported appliances in Class II malocclusion: A systematic review.

Authors:  Roshan Noor Mohamed; Sakeenabi Basha; Yousef Al-Thomali
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Treatment efficiency of mini-implant-borne distalization depending on age and second-molar eruption.

Authors:  M Nienkemper; B Wilmes; A Pauls; S Yamaguchi; B Ludwig; D Drescher
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-03-02       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Evaluation of Dentoalveolar and Dentofacial Effects of a Mini-Screw-Anchored Pendulum Appliance in Maxillary Molar Distalization.

Authors:  Mümin Kırcalı; Alime Sema Yüksel
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2018-12-01

6.  Comparison of two implant-supported molar distalization systems.

Authors:  Cagla Sar; Burcak Kaya; Omur Ozsoy; Ayca Arman Özcirpici
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Sagittal, rotational and transverse changes with three intraoral distalization force systems: Jones jig, distal jet and first class.

Authors:  Silvio-Augusto Bellini-Pereira; Aron Aliaga-Del Castillo; Lorena Vilanova; Mayara-Paim Patel; Rachelle-Simões Reis; Roberto-Henrique-da Costa Grec; José-Fernando-Castanha Henriques; Guilherme Janson
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2021-05-01

8.  Class II correction by maxillary en masse distalization using a completely customized lingual appliance and a novel mini-screw anchorage concept - preliminary results.

Authors:  Frauke Beyling; Elisabeth Klang; Eva Niehoff; Rainer Schwestka-Polly; Hans-Joachim Helms; Dirk Wiechmann
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 2.151

9.  A simplified approach to true molar intrusion.

Authors:  Stefanie Flieger; Thomas Ziebura; Johannes Kleinheinz; Dirk Wiechmann
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 2.151

10.  Comparison between Herbst appliances with or without miniscrew anchorage.

Authors:  Antonio Manni; Marco Pasini; Cozzani Mauro
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2012-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.