Literature DB >> 24441666

Dual mobility cup reduces dislocation and re-operation when used to treat displaced femoral neck fractures.

Anne S Bensen1, Thomas Jakobsen, Niels Krarup.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) as primary treatment for displaced femoral neck fractures is controversial as THA is associated with higher rates of dislocation but lower rates of re-operation compared to hemiarthroplasty (HA). A dual mobility cup (DMC) design is associated with lower dislocation and re-operation rates in elective surgery. Is this also the case when used to treat displaced femoral neck fractures? The aim of this study is to compare rates of dislocation and re-operation of any kind following treatment for displaced femoral neck fractures with either bipolar HA or THA with DMC.
METHODS: Two consecutive groups of patients treated for displaced femoral neck fractures at the Regional Hospital in Viborg in Denmark were included. In 2007-2008 171 patients (mean age 84.1 years) were treated with bipolar HA. In 2009-2010 175 patients (mean age 75.2 years) were treated with THA with DMC. Data regarding rates of dislocation and re-operation were obtained by retrospective review of medical records.
RESULTS: We found a statistically significant difference regarding rates of dislocation and re-operation of any kind in favour of THA with DMC. Dislocation occurred in 25/171 patients [95 % confidence interval (CI) 9.3-19.9 %] treated with bipolar HA and 8/175 patients (95 % CI 1.5-7.7 %) treated with THA with DMC (p = 0.002). Re-operations were required in 32/171 patients (95 % CI 12.9-24.6 %) treated with bipolar HA and 16/175 patients (95 % CI 4.8-13.4 %) treated with THA with DMC (p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that THA with DMC is superior to bipolar HA following treatment for displaced femoral neck fractures in regard to rates of dislocation and re-operation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24441666      PMCID: PMC4037505          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-013-2276-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  17 in total

1.  Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing hemiarthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures: winner of the Dorr Award.

Authors:  William Macaulay; Kate W Nellans; Kevin L Garvin; Richard Iorio; William L Healy; Melvin P Rosenwasser
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Periprosthetic femoral fractures--a comparison between cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasties.

Authors:  Andrew P Foster; Neville W Thompson; John Wong; A Philip Charlwood
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 3.  Biomechanical concept and clinical outcome of dual mobility cups.

Authors:  Aron Grazioli; Eugene Teow Hin Ek; Hannes Andreas Rüdiger
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Primary total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular hip fractures in older patients: systematic review.

Authors:  Colin Hopley; Dirk Stengel; Axel Ekkernkamp; Michael Wich
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-06-11

5.  Periprosthetic fractures around cementless hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stems.

Authors:  B C H van der Wal; M Vischjager; B Grimm; I C Heyligers; A J Tonino
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Risk factors for postoperative femoral fracture in cementless hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  C C Wu; M K Au; S S Wu; L C Lin
Journal:  J Formos Med Assoc       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Internal fixation versus total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures: a prospective randomized study of 100 hips.

Authors:  T Johansson; S A Jacobsson; I Ivarsson; A Knutsson; O Wahlström
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2000-12

Review 8.  Hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty for treating primary intracapsular fracture of the hip: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  C Carroll; M Stevenson; A Scope; P Evans; S Buckley
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 9.  Arthroplasties (with and without bone cement) for proximal femoral fractures in adults.

Authors:  Martyn J Parker; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Shin Azegami
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-06-16

10.  Dual mobility cup reduces dislocation rate after arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture.

Authors:  Sarunas Tarasevicius; Mantas Busevicius; Otto Robertsson; Hans Wingstrand
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  28 in total

1.  Surgical procedures in femoral neck fractures in Finland: a nationwide study between 1998 and 2011.

Authors:  Markus T Hongisto; Harri Pihlajamäki; Seppo Niemi; Maria Nuotio; Pekka Kannus; Ville M Mattila
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Guest Editorial: An Appeal for Evidenced-based Care and Adoption of Best Practices in the Management of Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures.

Authors:  Charles N Cornell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  The evolution of outcomes and indications for the dual-mobility cup: a systematic review.

Authors:  Cécile Batailler; Camdon Fary; Régis Verdier; Thierry Aslanian; Jacques Caton; Sebastien Lustig
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Dual mobility cups provide biomechanical advantages in situations at risk for dislocation: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Alexandre Terrier; Adeliya Latypova; Maika Guillemin; Valérie Parvex; Olivier Guyen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Complications following conversion of a hip hemiarthroplasty to a total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Simcha G Fichman; Tatu J Mäkinen; Alex Vincent; Benjamin Lozano; Oleg Safir; Paul R T Kuzyk
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  In total hip arthroplasty via the direct anterior approach, a dual-mobility cup prevents dislocation as effectively in hip fracture as in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Homma; Tomonori Baba; Yu Ozaki; Taiji Watari; Hideo Kobayashi; Hironori Ochi; Mikio Matsumoto; Kazuo Kaneko
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  The efficacy of dual-mobility cup in preventing dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Authors:  Matteo Romagnoli; Alberto Grassi; Giuseppe Gianluca Costa; Lionel E Lazaro; Mirco Lo Presti; Stefano Zaffagnini
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Anteromedial femoral neck plate with cannulated screws for the treatment of irreducible displaced femoral neck fracture in young patients: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Linbo Zhuang; Lisheng Wang; Dongming Xu; Zhiyong Wang
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2018-06-16       Impact factor: 3.693

9.  Dual mobility hip arthroplasty provides better outcomes compared to hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: a retrospective comparative clinical study.

Authors:  Yong Tae Kim; Je-Hyun Yoo; Min Ki Kim; Sanghyun Kim; Jihyo Hwang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Risk factors and modes of failure in the modern dual mobility implant. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fu-Yuan Pai; Hsuan-Hsiao Ma; Te-Feng Arthur Chou; Tsan-Wen Huang; Kuo-Chin Huang; Shang-Wen Tsai; Cheng-Fong Chen; Wei-Ming Chen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.