Literature DB >> 24436642

Working with industry: what is the conflict?

Peter W Marcello1.   

Abstract

The relationship between medicine and industry has always shared conflicts. There are obvious benefits to these relationships and inherent potential risks. The collaboration between academic medicine and industry has allowed for great advances in medicine in terms of drug, technology, and procedural developments. However, for-profit companies' interests may not align with those of academic universities. Companies tend to undertake research when the results of such work leads to company profits or enhances their reputation, and not solely for greater scientific understanding. In this article, the author reviews the types of conflicts of interest, the role of industry-sponsored trials, the adoption of new technologies from industry, and the role of industry with our medical society.

Keywords:  conflict of commitment; conflict of conscience; conflict of interest; industrial relationships; industry-sponsored trials

Year:  2013        PMID: 24436642      PMCID: PMC3699148          DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1333628

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg        ISSN: 1530-9681


  7 in total

1.  Focus Group on Laparoscopic Colectomy Education as endorsed by The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) and The Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES).

Authors:  James Fleshman; Peter Marcello; Michael J Stamos; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Serving two masters--conflicts of interest in academic medicine.

Authors:  Bernard Lo
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Responsibility of applicants for promoting objectivity in research for which public health service funding is sought and responsible prospective contractors. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2011-08-25

4.  A prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter trial comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: perioperative and one-year results.

Authors:  A J Senagore; M Singer; H Abcarian; J Fleshman; M Corman; S Wexner; S Nivatvongs
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Hand-assisted laparoscopic vs. laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  Peter W Marcello; James W Fleshman; Jeffrey W Milsom; Thomas E Read; Tracey D Arnell; Elisa H Birnbaum; Daniel L Feingold; Sang W Lee; Matthew G Mutch; Toyooki Sonoda; Yan Yan; Richard L Whelan
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2008-04-17       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Adoption of laparoscopic colectomy: results and implications of ASCRS hands-on course participation.

Authors:  Howard M Ross; Clifford L Simmang; James W Fleshman; Peter W Marcello
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.058

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Industry Payments to Urologists in 2014: an Analysis of the Open Payments Program.

Authors:  Parth K Modi; Nicholas J Farber; Michael E Zavaski; Thomas L Jang; Eric A Singer; Steven L Chang
Journal:  Urol Pract       Date:  2017-07

2.  Disparities in industry funding among Colorectal Surgeons: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Alessandra Storino; Carolina Vigna; John C Polanco-Santana; Ernest Park; Kristen Crowell; Anne Fabrizio; Thomas E Cataldo; Evangelos Messaris
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 3.453

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.