Literature DB >> 15622574

A prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter trial comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: perioperative and one-year results.

A J Senagore1, M Singer, H Abcarian, J Fleshman, M Corman, S Wexner, S Nivatvongs.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: There is a growing body of evidence supporting the lesser degrees of pain with stapled hemorrhoidopexy, also called the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids. However, there have been few randomized comparisons assessing both perioperative and long-term outcomes of the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy. Results are presented here from the first prospective, randomized, multicenter trial comparing these hemorrhoid procedures in the United States.
METHODS: Patients with prolapsing hemorrhoids (Grade III) were randomized to undergo the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids or Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy by colorectal surgeons who had training in using the stapling technique. Primary end points were acute postoperative pain, and hemorrhoid symptom recurrence requiring additional treatment at one-year follow-up from surgery.
RESULTS: A total of 156 patients (procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids, 77; Ferguson, 79) completed randomization and the surgical procedure, 18 (procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids, 12; Ferguson, 6) had significant protocol violations. One hundred seventeen patients (procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids, 59; Ferguson, 58) returned for one-year follow-up. Demographic parameters, hemorrhoid symptoms, preoperative pain scores, and bowel habits were similar between groups. There were a similar number of patients with adverse events in each group (procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids, 28 (36.4 percent) vs. Ferguson, 38 (48.1 percent); P = 0.138). Reoperation for an adverse effect was required in six (7.6 percent) Ferguson patients and in 0 patients having the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (P = 0.028). Postoperative pain during the first 14 days, pain at first bowel movement, and need for postoperative analgesics were significantly less in the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids group. Control of hemorrhoid symptoms was similar between groups; however, significantly fewer patients having the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids required additional anorectal procedures during one-year follow-up (procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids, 2 (2.6 percent), vs. Ferguson, 11 (13.9 percent); P = 0.01). Only four of the Ferguson patients (5 interventions) required additional procedures more than 30 days after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that stapled hemorrhoidopexy offers the benefits of less postoperative pain, less requirement for analgesics, and less pain at first bowel movement, while providing similar control of symptoms and need for additional hemorrhoid treatment at one-year follow-up from surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15622574     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-0694-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  50 in total

1.  Rectal stenosis after procedures for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH)--a report from China.

Authors:  Liqin Yao; Yunshi Zhong; Jianmin Xu; Meidong Xu; Pinghong Zhou
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Stapled hemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  Michael J Stamos
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  Hector Ortiz
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  Controversies in the treatment of common anal problems.

Authors:  Ismail Sagap; Feza-H Remzi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Long-Term Results After Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy: A 15-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Ralph Schneider; Pia Jäger; Andreas Ommer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 6.  Stapled haemorrhoidopexy compared to Milligan-Morgan and Ferguson haemorrhoidectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  K Laughlan; D G Jayne; D Jackson; F Rupprecht; G Ribaric
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 7.  Hemorrhoidectomy - making sense of the surgical options.

Authors:  Danson Yeo; Kok-Yang Tan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Stapled hemorrhoidopexy: the argument for usage.

Authors:  Marc Singer; Herand Abcarian
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2004-05

9.  Hemorrhoids.

Authors:  Amy Halverson
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-05

Review 10.  Stapled versus Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: is there any evidence-based information?

Authors:  George Sgourakis; Georgios C Sotiropoulos; Georgia Dedemadi; Arnold Radtke; Ioannis Papanikolaou; Thalis Christofides; Andreas D Rink; Constantine Karaliotas; Hauke Lang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.