Literature DB >> 21894659

Responsibility of applicants for promoting objectivity in research for which public health service funding is sought and responsible prospective contractors. Final rule.

.   

Abstract

This final rule implements changes to the regulations on the Responsibility of Applicants for Promoting Objectivity in Research for which Public Health Service Funding is Sought and Responsible Prospective Contractors. Since the promulgation of the regulations in 1995, biomedical and behavioral research and the resulting interactions among government, research Institutions, and the private sector have become increasingly complex. This complexity, as well as a need to strengthen accountability, led to changes that expand and add transparency to Investigators' disclosure of Significant Financial Interests (SFIs), enhance regulatory compliance and effective institutional oversight and management of Investigators' financial conflicts of interests, as well as increase the Department of Health and Human Services' (HHS) compliance oversight.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21894659

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fed Regist        ISSN: 0097-6326


  23 in total

1.  Measuring sensitivity to conflicts of interest: a preliminary test of method.

Authors:  Rebecca Ann Lind; Tammy Swenson-Lepper
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Managing financial conflict of interest in biomedical research.

Authors:  Sally J Rockey; Francis S Collins
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Resident and faculty perceptions of conflict of interest in medical education.

Authors:  Peter Y Watson; Akshay K Khandelwal; Joseph L Musial; John D Buckley
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Conflict of Interest and Funding Disclosure Policies of Environmental, Occupational, and Public Health Journals.

Authors:  David B Resnik; Brandon Konecny; Grace E Kissling
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.162

5.  Unraveling the conflicts to preserve research integrity.

Authors:  Brenda J Chapman
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2011-07

6.  Clinical investigator responsibilities.

Authors:  Allison R Baer; Susan Devine; Chris David Beardmore; Robert Catalano
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.840

7.  Exorcising ghostwriting…. Ghostwriting could potentially have serious repercussions for science and should therefore be treated as research misconduct.

Authors:  Xavier Bosch
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 8.807

8.  The cycle of bias in health research: a framework and toolbox for critical appraisal training.

Authors:  Donna H Odierna; Susan R Forsyth; Jenny White; Lisa A Bero
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 9.  Working with industry: what is the conflict?

Authors:  Peter W Marcello
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2013-03

10.  Taking financial relationships into account when assessing research.

Authors:  David B Resnik; Kevin C Elliott
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.622

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.