Literature DB >> 24431720

Comparative evaluation of bone in mandibular implant retained overdentures using delayed and immediate loading protocol: an in-vivo study.

Manesh Lahori1, A S Kaul1, Sidhartha Chandra1, Rahul Nagrath1, Himanshu Gupta1.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the changes in periimplant bone quality, crestal bone level and the implant stability (periotest) for mandibular implant retained overdentures with ball attachments using delayed and immediate loading protocols. Ten completely edentulous patients had two alpha bio dental implants placed in the anterior part of the mandible. The loading protocols for the patients was chosen randomly by drawing lots. Five patients were loaded under immediate loading protocols and other five following delayed. Crestal bone loss and bone quality were assessed around each implant. Periotest values were recorded for each implant at 3, 6 and 12 months after loading. Two implants were lost and were excluded from the study. However mean crestal bone loss around implants was 0.81 mm from the time of prosthetic loading to 12 months after prosthetic loading was seen and no significant result was found between the two groups for the crestal bone loss and the periotest values. Though the periotest value decreased (indicates increased stability) over the time period. The bone density changes were significant for both the groups at coronal level at all time intervals but at middle level significant only after 12 months of prosthetic loading, although individual variation was high. This study concluded that the changes in crestal bone level and periotest values were insignificant for the two groups. But the implant stability increased over the time and the crestal bone loss was evident with decreased rate over the period of time. There was wide individual variation for the bone density changes but overall increase in the density was seen.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Crestal bone; Implant stability; Overdenture; Periotest

Year:  2012        PMID: 24431720      PMCID: PMC3634939          DOI: 10.1007/s13191-012-0240-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc        ISSN: 0972-4052


  15 in total

1.  One-stage operative procedure using two different implant systems: a prospective study on implant overdentures in the edentulous mandible.

Authors:  A Tawse-Smith; C Perio; A G Payne; R Kumara; W M Thomson
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.932

2.  Two-stage IMZ implants and ITI implants inserted in a single-stage procedure. A prospective comparative study.

Authors:  Kees Heydenrijk; Gerry M Raghoebar; Henny J A Meijer; Willy A van der Reijden; Arie Jan van Winkelhoff; Boudewijn Stegenga
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 3.  Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant.

Authors:  N Meredith
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.681

4.  A randomised clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants in mandibular overdenture therapy. A 3-year report.

Authors:  I E Naert; S Gizani; M Vuylsteke; D van Steenberghe
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  A dual-purpose stent for the implant-supported prosthesis.

Authors:  M A Verde; S M Morgano
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.426

6.  Immediate loading of implants with mandibular overdentures: one-year clinical results of a prospective study.

Authors:  Nikolai J Attard; Lesley A David; George A Zarb
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.681

7.  Immediate loading of unsplinted implants in the anterior mandible for overdentures: a case series.

Authors:  Phillip Roe; Joseph Y K Kan; Kitichai Rungcharassaeng; Jamie L Lozada; Alejandro S Kleinman; Charles J Goodacre; Jung-Wei Chen
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Implant-retained mandibular overdentures with Brånemark System MKII implants: a prospective comparative study between delayed and immediate loading.

Authors:  M Chiapasco; S Abati; E Romeo; G Vogel
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 9.  Implant prosthodontic treatment options for the edentulous patient.

Authors:  G A Zarb; A Schmitt
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.837

10.  Conventional and early loading of unsplinted ITI implants supporting mandibular overdentures.

Authors:  Alan G T Payne; Andrew Tawse-Smith; Warwick D Duncan; Rohana Kumara
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.977

View more
  4 in total

1.  Locator® versus ceramic/electroplated double-crown attachments: a prospective study on the intraindividual comparison of implant-supported mandibular prostheses.

Authors:  Silvia Brandt; Jan Brandt; Ali-Reza Ketabi; Hans-Christoph Lauer; Anna Kunzmann
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-05-19       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  In vitro retention force measurement for three different attachment systems for implant-retained overdenture.

Authors:  Kareem Mohammed Reda; Ibrahim Ramadan El-Torky; Mohamed Nabeel El-Gendy
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

3.  Effects of type of magnet attachment and implant angulation in two implant overdenture models.

Authors:  So-Yeon Song; Kyeong-Hwan Kang; Jeong-Yol Lee; Sang-Wan Shin
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 1.904

Review 4.  Some issues related to evidence-based implantology.

Authors:  Gunnar E Carlsson
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.