Literature DB >> 24427576

Surgical outcome of bone anchored hearing aid (baha) implant surgery: a 10 years experience.

A Asma1, M A Ubaidah1, Siti Salbiah Hasan1, W H Wan Fazlina2, B Y Lim2, L Saim1, B S Goh1.   

Abstract

Bone anchored hearing aid (Baha) implant is an option for patient with canal atresia, single sided deafness(SSD) and chronically discharging ears despite treatments. This retrospective study was conducted from 2001 to 2011 to evaluate the surgical outcome of Baha implant surgery. Thirty-three patients were identified during this study period. Their age at implantation ranged from 5 to 40 years. Of 33 patients, 29 (87.9 %) patients had bilateral microtia and canal atresia, 3 (9.1 %) patients had unilateral microtia and canal atresia and 1 (3.0 %) patients have SSD following labyrinthitis. One patient (3.2 %) had major complication which is lost of implant due to failure of osseointegration. Soft tissue reactions were seen 7 patients (21.1 %). Of these 7 patients, 4 patients required 3-4 procedures as day care operation for excision of the skin overgrowth surrounding the abutment. Recurrent antibiotic treatment was required in 3 patients (9.7 %). None of our patient had history of intraoperative or peri-operative complication following Baha surgery. The commonest complications are local infection and inflammation at the implant site. None of our patient had history of intraoperative or peri-operative complication following Baha implant surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone anchored hearing aid; Canal atresia; Hearing loss; Microtia; Single sided deafness

Year:  2013        PMID: 24427576      PMCID: PMC3696154          DOI: 10.1007/s12070-013-0621-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2231-3796


  17 in total

1.  The BAHA HC200/300 in comparison with conventional bone conduction hearing aids.

Authors:  C T van der Pouw; A F Snik; C W Cremers
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  1999-06

2.  Soft tissue reactions around percutaneous implants: a clinical study of soft tissue conditions around skin-penetrating titanium implants for bone-anchored hearing aids.

Authors:  K M Holgers; A Tjellström; L M Bjursten; B E Erlandsson
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1988-01

3.  Bone-anchored hearing aids in infants and children younger than 5 years.

Authors:  Taryn Davids; Karen A Gordon; Doug Clutton; Blake C Papsin
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2007-01

4.  Osseointegrated implants in the management of childhood ear abnormalities: with particular emphasis on complications.

Authors:  Hisham Zeitoun; Ranit De; Stuart D Thompson; David W Proops
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.469

5.  Surgical experience with bone-anchored hearing aids in children.

Authors:  B C Papsin; T K Sirimanna; D M Albert; C M Bailey
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Osseointegrated implants in children: experience from our first 100 patients.

Authors:  G Granström; K Bergström; M Odersjö; A Tjellström
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.497

7.  Hearing rehabilitation using the BAHA bone-anchored hearing aid: results in 40 patients.

Authors:  L R Lustig; H A Arts; D E Brackmann; H F Francis; T Molony; C A Megerian; G F Moore; K M Moore; T Morrow; W Potsic; J T Rubenstein; S Srireddy; C A Syms; G Takahashi; D Vernick; P A Wackym; J K Niparko
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Hearing rehabilitation in congenital canal atresia.

Authors:  A Mazita; W H Wan Fazlina; A Abdullah; B S Goh; L Saim
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.858

9.  The Glasgow benefit inventory in the evaluation of patient satisfaction with the bone-anchored hearing aid: quality of life issues.

Authors:  Sunil N Dutt; Ann-Louise McDermott; Anwen Jelbert; Andrew P Reid; David W Proops
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol Suppl       Date:  2002

Review 10.  Candidacy for the bone-anchored hearing aid.

Authors:  Ad F M Snik; Arjan J Bosman; Emmanuel A M Mylanus; Cor W R J Cremers
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.854

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  First report of otitis externa caused by Schizophyllum commune and review of the literature.

Authors:  Tadeja Matos; Rok Tomazin; Saba Battelino
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 1.704

2.  Challenges During Baha Surgery: Our Experience.

Authors:  Hetal Marfatia; Ratna Priya; Nilam U Sathe; Shampa Mishra
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-06-10

3.  Outcomes of Bone Anchored Hearing Aid Implant at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre (UKMMC).

Authors:  Suhana Abdul Rahim; Bee-See Goh; Safinaz Zainor; Roslenda Abdul Rahman; Asma Abdullah
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-09-12

4.  Robustness and lifetime of the bone conduction implant - a pilot study.

Authors:  Karl-Johan Fredén Jansson; Bo Håkansson; Cristina Rigato; Måns Eeg-Olofsson; Sabine Reinfeldt
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2019-02-26

5.  Skin reactions caused by bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) implantation.

Authors:  Gen-di Yin; Xiangli Zeng; Peng Li
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2016-02-10

6.  A Comparison of the Operative Techniques and the Postoperative Complications for Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid Implantation.

Authors:  Mark W Steehler; Sean P Larner; Joshua S Mintz; Matthew K Steehler; Sidney P Lipman; Shane Griffith
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-01-18

7.  Medical, Technical and Audiological Outcomes of Hearing Rehabilitation with the Bonebridge Transcutaneous Bone-Conduction Implant: A Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Faris F Brkic; Dominik Riss; Katharina Scheuba; Christoph Arnoldner; Wolfgang Gstöttner; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner; Erich Vyskocil
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 4.241

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.