Literature DB >> 3364537

Soft tissue reactions around percutaneous implants: a clinical study of soft tissue conditions around skin-penetrating titanium implants for bone-anchored hearing aids.

K M Holgers1, A Tjellström, L M Bjursten, B E Erlandsson.   

Abstract

Some patients with hearing impairment cannot use conventional hearing aids. One solution for these patients is the use of bone conduction hearing aids; however, this kind of equipment is associated with several problems related to the necessity for a good contact between the transducer and the temporal bone. Direct bone contact would be an ideal solution provided that safe and reaction-free skin penetration and a safe and permanent bone anchorage could be achieved. Brånemark et al have developed a procedure to furnish edentulous patients with fixed bridges using titanium implants. This report is focused on the clinical status of the soft tissue adjacent to the 67 skin-penetrating devices in 60 patients. The patients have been followed between 3 and 96 months on 313 occasions, which represents a total observation time of 1515 months of clinical performance. Only one implant was extracted due to adverse skin reaction, giving a failure rate of 0.07% per month. This is comparable with the failure rate of cardiac pacemakers 0.02-0.04% per month).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3364537

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Otol        ISSN: 0192-9763


  54 in total

1.  Skin reactions following BAHA surgery using the skin flap dermatome technique.

Authors:  Vincent Van Rompaey; Gerd Claes; Nadia Verstraeten; Joost van Dinther; Andrzej Zarowski; Erwin Offeciers; Thomas Somers
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Wide diameter bone-anchored hearing system implants: a comparison of long-term follow-up data between tissue reduction and tissue preservation techniques.

Authors:  Martin Reznitsky; Kirsten Wielandt; Søren Foghsgaard
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  BAHA: Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid.

Authors:  Abdulrahman Hagr
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2007-07

Review 4.  A systematic review on skin complications of bone-anchored hearing aids in relation to surgical techniques.

Authors:  Shwan Mohamad; Imran Khan; S Y Hey; S S Musheer Hussain
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-12-14       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Current trends in implantable hearing AIDS.

Authors:  M Chasin
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1997-09

6.  Switching from a percutaneous to a transcutaneous bone anchored hearing system: the utility of the fascia temporalis superficialis pedicled flap in case of skin intolerance.

Authors:  A Devèze; S Rossetto; R Meller; M Sanjuan Puchol
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Challenges of Hearing Rehabilitation after Radiation and Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Marc-Elie Nader; Paul W Gidley
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2019-02-04

Review 8.  Punch vs open surgical techniques for placement of bone-anchored hearing implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis of skin reactions and operating time.

Authors:  Qianyu Xiao; Fanghua Gong; Ning Wang; Weihua Hu
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Percutaneous bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: linear incision technique with tissue preservation versus linear incision technique with tissue reduction.

Authors:  E H H van der Stee; R M Strijbos; S J H Bom; M K S Hol
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Simplified technique without skin flap for the bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) implant.

Authors:  R Bovo
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.124

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.