Literature DB >> 29456939

Outcomes of Bone Anchored Hearing Aid Implant at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre (UKMMC).

Suhana Abdul Rahim1, Bee-See Goh1,2, Safinaz Zainor1, Roslenda Abdul Rahman1, Asma Abdullah1,2.   

Abstract

The cross sectional study was conducted in Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Center (UKMMC), Malaysia from August 2012 to December 2013. All patients implanted with in UKMMC from December 2001 until December 2012 was included. Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) questionnaires and UKMMC questionnaires were used as part of the assessment tool. The GBI is a scoring which measures the change in health status produced by surgical interventions. UKMMC questionnaires was invented by our department to assess questions related to social and life style of patients and also the cosmetic perspective Baha implant and other daily related activities. The audiological assessment was assessed using hearing aid gain threshold. Complication with regards to skin reaction was graded using Holger Skin Classification. A total of 40 patients underwent Baha implant were recruited but only 35 patients fulfilled the criteria and included in this study for analysis. Age of patients ranged from 5 year old to 38 year old, with median of 13 years old. There were 22 patients (62.8%) were male and 13 patients (37.1%) were females. Almost all cases were canal atresia except one adult patient was a case of bilateral chronic discharging ear with chronic irritation with ear mould. Majority of patients 21 (60%) have hearing level of moderate to severe hearing loss (40-89 dB) and 14 patients (40%) have mild to moderate hearing loss (20-39 dB). The level of hearing was retested post operatively. All of the patients have improvement in their aided hearing with the range of 10-25 dBL which is statistically significant at p value of <0.05. The GBI was scored positively in all subscales. Majority of patients (91.4%) used BAHA more than 4 h per day and 88.6% agreed that BAHA is cosmetically acceptable. All patients experienced some form of skin irritation (Holger grade 1-2) however only 20% required surgical intervention. All our patients have range of 10-25 dB improvement of their aided hearing which is statistically significant at p value of <0.05. BAHA has been proven to show significant benefit in audiological improvement and quality of life.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Baha implant; Bone conduction hearing aid; Conductive hearing loss; Quality of life

Year:  2017        PMID: 29456939      PMCID: PMC5807290          DOI: 10.1007/s12070-017-1193-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2231-3796


  16 in total

1.  Ten years of experience with the Swedish bone-anchored hearing system.

Authors:  B Håkansson; G Lidén; A Tjellström; A Ringdahl; M Jacobsson; P Carlsson; B E Erlandson
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  1990-10

2.  Bone-anchored hearing aids: results of the first eight years of a programme in a district general hospital, assessed by the Glasgow benefit inventory.

Authors:  D Gillett; J W Fairley; T S Chandrashaker; A Bean; J Gonzalez
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2006-05-04       Impact factor: 1.469

3.  Bone-anchored hearing aid: quality of life assess by glasgow benefit inventory

Authors: 
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  2000-12

4.  [Quality of life in patients implanted with the BAHA device depending on the aetiology].

Authors:  Asier Lekue; Luis Lassaletta; Isabel Sánchez-Camón; Rosa Pérez-Mora; Javier Gavilán
Journal:  Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp       Date:  2012-08-09

5.  Disability, handicap and benefit analysis with the bone-anchored hearing aid: the Glasgow hearing aid benefit and difference profiles.

Authors:  Ann-Louise McDermott; Sunil N Dutt; Elia Tziambazis; Andrew P Reid; David W Proops
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol Suppl       Date:  2002

6.  The Glasgow benefit inventory in the evaluation of patient satisfaction with the bone-anchored hearing aid: quality of life issues.

Authors:  Sunil N Dutt; Ann-Louise McDermott; Anwen Jelbert; Andrew P Reid; David W Proops
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol Suppl       Date:  2002

7.  Surgical outcome of bone anchored hearing aid (baha) implant surgery: a 10 years experience.

Authors:  A Asma; M A Ubaidah; Siti Salbiah Hasan; W H Wan Fazlina; B Y Lim; L Saim; B S Goh
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-02-02

8.  Intracerebral abscess after abutment change of a bone anchored hearing aid (BAHA).

Authors:  Martin Scholz; Harald Eufinger; Agnes Anders; Bernd Illerhaus; Matthias König; Kirsten Schmieder; Albrecht Harders
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Bone-anchored hearing aid implant location in relation to skin reactions.

Authors:  Hubert T Faber; Maarten J F de Wolf; Jacky W J de Rooy; Myrthe K S Hol; Cor W R J Cremers; Emmanuel A M Mylanus
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2009-08

10.  The current practice trends in pediatric bone-anchored hearing aids in Canada: a national clinical and surgical practice survey.

Authors:  C Carrie Liu; Neil K Chadha; Manohar Bance; Paul Hong
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-07-01
View more
  1 in total

1.  The bone conduction implant BONEBRIDGE increases quality of life and social life satisfaction.

Authors:  C Irmer; S Volkenstein; S Dazert; A Neumann
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 2.503

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.