Literature DB >> 11458220

Osseointegrated implants in children: experience from our first 100 patients.

G Granström1, K Bergström, M Odersjö, A Tjellström.   

Abstract

This study was undertaken on 100 children aged 16 years or under intended for installation of osseointegrated implants. Of these, 76 had implants installed for bone-anchored hearing aids or prostheses. The main indication for implant installation was a bilateral ear malformation. Surgery was generally performed as a two-stage procedure with a healing time of 3 to 4 months in between. Available bone thickness was on average 2.5 mm, and lack of bone necessitated bone augmentation in 12 patients. Thirty-nine percent of implants were installed in contact with the dura, sigmoid sinus, or an air cell. Implant failures were 5.8% of 170 inserted fixtures. Adverse skin reactions appeared in 9.1% of patients over a 21-year follow-up period. Revision surgery was undertaken in 22% of patients because of appositional growth of the temporal bone. Of the 24 children considered but not found suitable for osseointegration surgery, plastic surgery was considered a better option, or growth of the temporal bone was awaited. It is concluded that the rate of implant failure is lower in children; the frequency of skin reactions is the same as in adults, but revision surgery is more common in young patients because of new bone formation. Our clinical experience supported by the data presented in this article suggests that the concept could be used with good functional and aesthetic results in children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11458220     DOI: 10.1067/mhn.2001.116190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  8 in total

Review 1.  Auricular reconstruction for microtia: A review of available methods.

Authors:  Narges Baluch; Satoru Nagata; Chul Park; Gordon H Wilkes; John Reinisch; Leila Kasrai; David Fisher
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 0.947

2.  One lesson from arthroplasty to osseointegration in search for better fixation of in-bone implanted prosthesis.

Authors:  Mark Pitkin
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2008

3.  BAHA: Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid.

Authors:  Abdulrahman Hagr
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2007-07

4.  Simplified technique without skin flap for the bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) implant.

Authors:  R Bovo
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.124

5.  Bone anchored hearing aid: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2002-09-01

6.  Surgical outcome of bone anchored hearing aid (baha) implant surgery: a 10 years experience.

Authors:  A Asma; M A Ubaidah; Siti Salbiah Hasan; W H Wan Fazlina; B Y Lim; L Saim; B S Goh
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-02-02

Review 7.  Bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA): indications, functional results, and comparison with reconstructive surgery of the ear.

Authors:  Ricardo Ferreira Bento; Alessandra Kiesewetter; Liliane Satomi Ikari; Rubens Brito
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-07

8.  Ex vivo Evaluation of a New Drill System for Placement of Percutaneous Bone Conduction Devices.

Authors:  Ruben M Strijbos; Louise V Straatman; Robert J Stokroos; Martin L Johansson
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-21
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.