| Literature DB >> 24424390 |
L A Carvalho1, V Bergink2, L Sumaski3, J Wijkhuijs4, W J Hoogendijk2, T K Birkenhager2, H A Drexhage4.
Abstract
In this study, we used new technology to investigate whether a coherent pattern of enhanced expression of inflammatory and other immune activation genes in circulating monocytes is found in patients with major depression. Since a high inflammatory state of monocytes might be related to glucocorticoid resistance, we also included the genes for the two isoforms of the glucocorticoid receptor. For this study, we aimed at finding a similar coherent pattern of inflammatory and immune activation genes in monocytes of patients with MDD and recruited 47 medication-free melancholic MDD inpatients and 42 healthy controls. A quantitative-polymerase chain reaction (Q-PCR) monocyte gene expression analysis was performed using a panel of inflammatory-related genes previously identified as abnormally regulated in mood disorder patients. Selected serum cytokines/chemokines were assessed using a cytometric bead array. Depressive symptoms were analysed using Hamilton depression scores (HAMD). Thirty-four of the 47 monocyte inflammatory-related genes were significantly upregulated and 2 were significantly downregulated as compared to controls, the latter including the gene for the active GRα in particular in those with a high HAMD score. The reduced GRα expression correlated strongly to the upregulation of the inflammatory genes in monocytes. Serum levels of IL6, IL8, CCL2 and VEGF were significantly increased in patients compared to controls. Our data show the deregulation of two interrelated homoeostatic systems, that is, the immune system and the glucocorticoid system, co-occurring in major depression.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24424390 PMCID: PMC3905228 DOI: 10.1038/tp.2013.118
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Psychiatry ISSN: 2158-3188 Impact factor: 6.222
Figure 1(a) Q-PCR analysis of monocytes of MDD patients (n=47) as compared to healthy control (HC) (n=42) values, set at onefold. The quantitative value obtained from Q-PCR is a cycle threshold (CT). The fold change values between different groups were determined from normalized CT values (CT gene–CT reference gene ABL), by the ΔΔCT methods (2−ΔΔCT, user Bulletin 2, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) as per DataAssist software. Data were standardized to the HC (thus the HC were used as the calibrator). The fold change of the HC is therefore 1. For gene expression, P was tested by univariate analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) vs control subjects; age and gender are included in this model. (b) Heat map of gene correlation, data represent Spearman's correlation coefficients, tested on the relative mRNA expression. Significant positive correlations (P<0.05) are given by the red scale (darkest red are correlations >0.5), significant negative correlations are given by the green scale. Lighter fields are not significant. FC, fold change; MDD, major disorder. P values are shown after Simes' correction. Bold FC are significantly upregulated.
Correlation analysis of the GRα and GRβ expression level compared to expression levels fingerprint genes in monocytes of MDD patients (n=47)
| GRα | 1 | |||
| GRβ | −0.253 | 0.073 | ||
| CCL20 | −0.475 | 0.002 | 0.456 | 0.002 |
| IL1β | −0.513 | 0.002 | 0.500 | 0.002 |
| EREG | −0.534 | 0.001 | 0.555 | 0.001 |
| PDE4B | −0.444 | 0.002 | 0.458 | 0.002 |
| CXCL2 | −0.601 | 0.002 | 0.541 | 0.002 |
| IL8 | −0.525 | 0.001 | 0.520 | 0.001 |
| TNFAIP3 | −0.289 | 0.054 | 0.304 | 0.041 |
| BTG3 | −0.681 | 0.002 | 0.517 | 0.002 |
| PTX3 | −0.572 | 0.002 | 0.490 | 0.002 |
| ADM | −0.627 | 0.002 | 0.407 | 0.005 |
| CDC42 | −0.731 | 0.002 | 0.523 | 0.002 |
| ATF3 | −0.603 | 0.002 | 0.588 | 0.002 |
| MAFF | −0.688 | 0.002 | 0.513 | 0.002 |
| BCL2A1 | −0.615 | 0.002 | 0.497 | 0.002 |
| IL6 | −0.530 | 0.002 | 0.532 | 0.002 |
| MAPK6 | −0.570 | 0.002 | 0.602 | 0.002 |
| IL1A | −0.433 | 0.005 | 0.495 | 0.002 |
| MXD1 | −0.420 | 0.003 | 0.394 | 0.007 |
| PTGS2 | −0.474 | 0.002 | 0.451 | 0.002 |
| SERPINB2 | −0.450 | 0.002 | 0.495 | 0.002 |
| IFIT3 | 0.139 | 0.378 | 0.193 | 0.203 |
| NMES1 | −0.636 | 0.001 | 0.551 | 0.001 |
| CXCL3 | −0.563 | 0.001 | 0.465 | 0.001 |
| IRAK2 | −0.685 | 0.002 | 0.427 | 0.004 |
| EGR3 | −0.385 | 0.009 | 0.616 | 0.002 |
| DUSP2 | −0.465 | 0.002 | 0.362 | 0.014 |
| TNF | −0.361 | 0.013 | 0.286 | 0.055 |
| Pu.1 | −0.199 | 0.212 | −0.067 | 0.664 |
| DAP12 | −0.017 | 0.926 | −0.003 | 0.985 |
| DHRS3 | −0.123 | 0.432 | 0.338 | 0.023 |
| RGC32 | −0.636 | 0.002 | 0.551 | 0.002 |
| CCL2 | −0.41 | 0.005 | 0.441 | 0.002 |
| ILR1 | 0.000 | 0.997 | 0.414 | 0.005 |
| TREM1 | −0.052 | 0.747 | 0.541 | 0.002 |
| EMP1 | −0.286 | 0.055 | 0.375 | 0.011 |
| THBD | −0.298 | 0.047 | 0.216 | 0.154 |
| NAB2 | −0.436 | 0.002 | 0.119 | 0.442 |
| CCL7 | −0.550 | 0.002 | 0.577 | 0.002 |
| STX1A | −0.405 | 0.005 | 0.325 | 0.029 |
| AREG | −0.576 | 0.002 | 0.329 | 0.030 |
| PTPN7 | −0.197 | 0.204 | 0.092 | 0.555 |
| FABP5 | 0.122 | 0.432 | 0.289 | 0.054 |
| CD9 | −0.367 | 0.012 | −0.219 | 0.151 |
| HSP | 0.716 | 0.002 | −0.169 | 0.264 |
| IFI27 | −0.216 | 0.168 | 0.231 | 0.136 |
Data show the Spearman's correlation coefficients and significance levels after Simes' correction.
Figure 2Serum cytokine levels in MDD (n=47) and HC (n=42). Data shown are mean±s.e.m. in pg per ml.*PÂ⩽0.05 after Simes' correction.
Linear regression models for the association between GRα, GRβ and GRα/β ratio and total HAMD scores in patients with major depression (n=47)
| P | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | −0.284 | −0.03 | 0.050 | −0.06 | 0.001 |
| Model 2 | −0.278 | −0.029 | 0.066 | −0.062 | 0.002 |
| Model 1 | 0.220 | 0.048 | 0.138 | −0.016 | 0.111 |
| Model 2 | 0.234 | 0.051 | 0.112 | 0.003 | 0.115 |
| Model 1 | −0.295 | −0.078 | 0.044 | −0.153 | −0.021 |
| Model 2 | −0.303 | −0.080 | 0.040 | −0.032 | −0.013 |
Ordinal regression models for the association between GRα, GRβ, GRα/β ratio, inflammatory molecules and psychic anxiety as measured by item 10 of the HAMD scores in patients with major depression (n=47) adjustment for age, gender and BMI
| P | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Log GRα | 3.902 | 7943 | 0.078 | −0.441 | 8.245 |
| Log GRβ | −4.834 | 1.46*, 10−5 | 0.001 | −7.595 | −2.073 |
| Log GRAB | 1.573 | 37.41 | 0.001 | 0.654 | 2.493 |
| Log AREG | −1.122 | 0.075 | 0.009 | −1.965 | −0.278 |
| Log CDC42 | −2.877 | 0.0013 | 0.003 | −4.799 | −0.955 |
| Log NMES1 | −0.826 | 0.149 | 0.009 | −1.445 | −0.207 |
| Log CCL7 | −1.169 | 0.067 | 0.005 | −1.979 | −0.359 |
| Log EREG | −1.290 | 0.051 | 0.009 | −2.259 | −0.320 |
*P⩽0.05.
Model 1—Crude association.
Model 2—Further adjustment for age, gender and BMI.