CONTEXT: Increased concentrations of inflammatory biomarkers predict antidepressant nonresponse, and inflammatory cytokines can sabotage and circumvent the mechanisms of action of conventional antidepressants. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether inhibition of the inflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor (TNF) reduces depressive symptoms in patients with treatment-resistant depression and whether an increase in baseline plasma inflammatory biomarkers, including high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), TNF, and its soluble receptors, predicts treatment response. DESIGN: Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. SETTING:Outpatient infusion center at Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 60 medically stable outpatients with major depression who were either on a consistent antidepressant regimen (n = 37) or medication-free (n = 23) for 4 weeks or more and who were moderately resistant to treatment as determined by the Massachusetts General Hospital Staging method. INTERVENTIONS: Three infusions of the TNF antagonist infliximab (5 mg/kg) (n = 30) or placebo (n = 30) at baseline and weeks 2 and 6 of a 12-week trial. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The 17-item Hamilton Scale for Depression (HAM-D) scores. RESULTS: No overall difference in change of HAM-D scores between treatment groups across time was found. However, there was a significant interaction between treatment, time, and log baseline hs-CRP concentration (P = .01), with change in HAM-D scores (baseline to week 12) favoring infliximab-treated patients at a baseline hs-CRP concentration greater than 5 mg/L and favoring placebo-treated patients at a baseline hs-CRP concentration of 5 mg/L or less. Exploratory analyses focusing on patients with a baseline hs-CRP concentration greater than 5 mg/L revealed a treatment response (≥50% reduction in HAM-D score at any point during treatment) of 62% (8 of 13 patients) in infliximab-treated patients vs 33% (3 of 9 patients) in placebo-treated patients (P = .19). Baseline concentrations of TNF and its soluble receptors were significantly higher in infliximab-treated responders vs nonresponders (P < .05), and infliximab-treated responders exhibited significantly greater decreases in hs-CRP from baseline to week 12 compared with placebo-treated responders (P < .01). Dropouts and adverse events were limited and did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: This proof-of-concept study suggests that TNF antagonism does not have generalized efficacy in treatment-resistant depression but may improve depressive symptoms in patients with high baseline inflammatory biomarkers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00463580.
RCT Entities:
CONTEXT: Increased concentrations of inflammatory biomarkers predict antidepressant nonresponse, and inflammatory cytokines can sabotage and circumvent the mechanisms of action of conventional antidepressants. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether inhibition of the inflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor (TNF) reduces depressive symptoms in patients with treatment-resistant depression and whether an increase in baseline plasma inflammatory biomarkers, including high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), TNF, and its soluble receptors, predicts treatment response. DESIGN: Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. SETTING:Outpatient infusion center at Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 60 medically stable outpatients with major depression who were either on a consistent antidepressant regimen (n = 37) or medication-free (n = 23) for 4 weeks or more and who were moderately resistant to treatment as determined by the Massachusetts General Hospital Staging method. INTERVENTIONS: Three infusions of the TNF antagonist infliximab (5 mg/kg) (n = 30) or placebo (n = 30) at baseline and weeks 2 and 6 of a 12-week trial. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The 17-item Hamilton Scale for Depression (HAM-D) scores. RESULTS: No overall difference in change of HAM-D scores between treatment groups across time was found. However, there was a significant interaction between treatment, time, and log baseline hs-CRP concentration (P = .01), with change in HAM-D scores (baseline to week 12) favoring infliximab-treated patients at a baseline hs-CRP concentration greater than 5 mg/L and favoring placebo-treated patients at a baseline hs-CRP concentration of 5 mg/L or less. Exploratory analyses focusing on patients with a baseline hs-CRP concentration greater than 5 mg/L revealed a treatment response (≥50% reduction in HAM-D score at any point during treatment) of 62% (8 of 13 patients) in infliximab-treated patients vs 33% (3 of 9 patients) in placebo-treated patients (P = .19). Baseline concentrations of TNF and its soluble receptors were significantly higher in infliximab-treated responders vs nonresponders (P < .05), and infliximab-treated responders exhibited significantly greater decreases in hs-CRP from baseline to week 12 compared with placebo-treated responders (P < .01). Dropouts and adverse events were limited and did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: This proof-of-concept study suggests that TNF antagonism does not have generalized efficacy in treatment-resistant depression but may improve depressive symptoms in patients with high baseline inflammatory biomarkers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00463580.
Authors: Patrick J McGrath; Jonathan W Stewart; Maurizio Fava; Madhukar H Trivedi; Stephen R Wisniewski; Andrew A Nierenberg; Michael E Thase; Lori Davis; Melanie M Biggs; Kathy Shores-Wilson; James F Luther; George Niederehe; Diane Warden; A John Rush Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Stephen Tyring; Alice Gottlieb; Kim Papp; Ken Gordon; Craig Leonardi; Andrea Wang; Deepa Lalla; Michael Woolley; Angelika Jahreis; Ralph Zitnik; David Cella; Ranga Krishnan Journal: Lancet Date: 2006-01-07 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: J Paul Monk; Gary Phillips; Ross Waite; John Kuhn; Larry J Schaaf; Gregory A Otterson; Denis Guttridge; Chris Rhoades; Manisha Shah; Tamara Criswell; Michael A Caligiuri; Miguel A Villalona-Calero Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-04-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Lucile Capuron; Giuseppe Pagnoni; Marina Demetrashvili; Bobbi J Woolwine; Charles B Nemeroff; Gregory S Berns; Andrew H Miller Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2005-08-01 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Timothy Petersen; George I Papakostas; Michael A Posternak; Alexis Kant; Wendy M Guyker; Dan V Iosifescu; Albert S Yeung; Andrew A Nierenberg; Maurizio Fava Journal: J Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 3.153
Authors: P Persoons; S Vermeire; K Demyttenaere; B Fischler; J Vandenberghe; L Van Oudenhove; M Pierik; T Hlavaty; G Van Assche; M Noman; P Rutgeerts Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2005-07-15 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: A John Rush; Madhukar H Trivedi; Stephen R Wisniewski; Andrew A Nierenberg; Jonathan W Stewart; Diane Warden; George Niederehe; Michael E Thase; Philip W Lavori; Barry D Lebowitz; Patrick J McGrath; Jerrold F Rosenbaum; Harold A Sackeim; David J Kupfer; James Luther; Maurizio Fava Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Elisabeth G Vichaya; Phillip S Gross; Darlene J Estrada; Steve W Cole; Aaron J Grossberg; Scott E Evans; Michael J Tuvim; Burton F Dickey; Robert Dantzer Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2019-02-26 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Christopher A Lowry; David G Smith; Philip H Siebler; Dominic Schmidt; Christopher E Stamper; James E Hassell; Paula S Yamashita; James H Fox; Stefan O Reber; Lisa A Brenner; Andrew J Hoisington; Teodor T Postolache; Kerry A Kinney; Dante Marciani; Mark Hernandez; Sian M J Hemmings; Stefanie Malan-Muller; Kenneth P Wright; Rob Knight; Charles L Raison; Graham A W Rook Journal: Curr Environ Health Rep Date: 2016-09
Authors: Michael R Irwin; Steve Cole; Richard Olmstead; Elizabeth C Breen; Joshua Jin Cho; Mona Moieni; Naomi I Eisenberger Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2018-11-03 Impact factor: 7.853