OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of plasma level-targeted dose imipramine and high-dose venlafaxine in depressed inpatients in a randomized double-blind study. METHODS: The study included 85 patients with a diagnosis of major depressive episode according to the DSM IV criteria and a 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) score ≥ 17. Patients were randomized to imipramine or venlafaxine. The dose of imipramine was adjusted for each patient to a predefined blood level of 200-300 ng/ml. The dose of venlafaxine was increased gradually to 300-375 mg/day. Efficacy was evaluated after 7 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: The mean age of the study group was 54.5 (range 29-82) years. There was no significant difference according to the primary outcome criterion of a ≥50% reduction on the HAM-D score: 17 of 43 (39.5%) patients on imipramine were responders compared to 21 of 42 (50%) patients on venlafaxine. When considering remission as outcome criterion (HAM-D score ≤ 7), 10 of 43 (23.3%) patients on imipramine were remitters compared to 15 of 42 (35.7%) patients on venlafaxine; again, no significant difference. When analysing a subpopulation of patients without psychotic features, with remission as outcome criterion, a significant difference was found: 5 of 34 (14.7%) patients on imipramine were remitters compared to 12 of 31 (38.7%) patients on venlafaxine. CONCLUSIONS: The present study used optimal doses in depressed inpatients and showed that venlafaxine is at least equal in efficacy to imipramine. The results in the subgroup without psychotic features indicate a possible superiority of venlafaxine.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of plasma level-targeted dose imipramine and high-dose venlafaxine in depressed inpatients in a randomized double-blind study. METHODS: The study included 85 patients with a diagnosis of major depressive episode according to the DSM IV criteria and a 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) score ≥ 17. Patients were randomized to imipramine or venlafaxine. The dose of imipramine was adjusted for each patient to a predefined blood level of 200-300 ng/ml. The dose of venlafaxine was increased gradually to 300-375 mg/day. Efficacy was evaluated after 7 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: The mean age of the study group was 54.5 (range 29-82) years. There was no significant difference according to the primary outcome criterion of a ≥50% reduction on the HAM-D score: 17 of 43 (39.5%) patients on imipramine were responders compared to 21 of 42 (50%) patients on venlafaxine. When considering remission as outcome criterion (HAM-D score ≤ 7), 10 of 43 (23.3%) patients on imipramine were remitters compared to 15 of 42 (35.7%) patients on venlafaxine; again, no significant difference. When analysing a subpopulation of patients without psychotic features, with remission as outcome criterion, a significant difference was found: 5 of 34 (14.7%) patients on imipramine were remitters compared to 12 of 31 (38.7%) patients on venlafaxine. CONCLUSIONS: The present study used optimal doses in depressed inpatients and showed that venlafaxine is at least equal in efficacy to imipramine. The results in the subgroup without psychotic features indicate a possible superiority of venlafaxine.
Authors: Marlijn Vermeiden; Astrid M Kamperman; Monique E Vulink; Walter W van den Broek; Tom K Birkenhäger Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2014-10-23 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Laura Grosse; Livia A Carvalho; Tom K Birkenhager; Witte J Hoogendijk; Steven A Kushner; Hemmo A Drexhage; Veerle Bergink Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2015-05-08 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: L A Carvalho; V Bergink; L Sumaski; J Wijkhuijs; W J Hoogendijk; T K Birkenhager; H A Drexhage Journal: Transl Psychiatry Date: 2014-01-14 Impact factor: 6.222
Authors: Oliver Ambrée; Veerle Bergink; Laura Grosse; Judith Alferink; Hemmo A Drexhage; Matthias Rothermundt; Volker Arolt; Tom K Birkenhäger Journal: Int J Neuropsychopharmacol Date: 2015-09-12 Impact factor: 5.176