Literature DB >> 24416512

Video-assisted thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy: the experience of Shanghai Chest Hospital.

Teng Mao1, Wentao Fang1, Zhitao Gu1, Xufeng Guo1, Chunyu Ji1, Wenhu Chen1.   

Abstract

The traditional open esophagectomy is associated with higher morbidity, while minimally invasive procedures could be accompanied with a lower one. In this case, the patient is placed in the prone-decubitus position and the surgeon stands in front of the patient. The "four ports" approach is adopted in the thoracoscopic procedure with CO2 insufflation, and the esophagus and lymph nodes are dissected. In the laparoscopic procedure, "hand assistant technique" is employed. The esophagogastric anastomosis is similar with McKeown procedure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Esophageal cancer; esophagectomy; laparoscopy; thoracoscopy

Year:  2013        PMID: 24416512      PMCID: PMC3886866          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2013.12.14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  6 in total

1.  Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Emily V A Finlayson; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Ida Batista; H Gilbert Welch; David E Wennberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Outcomes after esophagectomy: a ten-year prospective cohort.

Authors:  Stephen H Bailey; David A Bull; David H Harpole; Jeffrey J Rentz; Leigh A Neumayer; Theodore N Pappas; Jennifer Daley; William G Henderson; Barbara Krasnicka; Shukri F Khuri
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Short-term outcomes following open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer in England: a population-based national study.

Authors:  Ravikrishna Mamidanna; Alex Bottle; Paul Aylin; Omar Faiz; George B Hanna
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Factors associated with postoperative pulmonary morbidity after esophagectomy for cancer.

Authors:  Urs Zingg; Bernard M Smithers; David C Gotley; Garett Smith; Ahmad Aly; Anthony Clough; Adrian J Esterman; Glyn G Jamieson; David I Watson
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Effectiveness of combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy: comparison of postoperative complications and midterm oncological outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Yousuke Kinjo; Noriaki Kurita; Fumiaki Nakamura; Hiroshi Okabe; Eiji Tanaka; Yoshiki Kataoka; Atsushi Itami; Yoshiharu Sakai; Shunichi Fukuhara
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-09-05       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients.

Authors:  James D Luketich; Miguel Alvelo-Rivera; Percival O Buenaventura; Neil A Christie; James S McCaughan; Virginia R Litle; Philip R Schauer; John M Close; Hiran C Fernando
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 12.969

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy and thoraco-abdominal two-field lymph node dissection for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma-antegrade dissection of the thoracic esophagus.

Authors:  Wentao Fang; Chunyu Ji; Jian Feng; Weigang Zhao; Xuefei Zhang
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2016-09-05

2.  Improvement of surgical complications using single-lumen endotracheal tube intubation and artificial carbon dioxide pneumothorax in esophagectomy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kai-Hao Chuang; Hsing-Hua Lai; Yu Chen; Li-Chun Chen; Hung-I Lu; Yen-Hao Chen; Shau-Hsuan Li; Chien-Ming Lo
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 1.637

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.