Literature DB >> 21184193

Factors associated with postoperative pulmonary morbidity after esophagectomy for cancer.

Urs Zingg1, Bernard M Smithers, David C Gotley, Garett Smith, Ahmad Aly, Anthony Clough, Adrian J Esterman, Glyn G Jamieson, David I Watson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most studies analyzing risk factors for pulmonary morbidity date from the early 1990s. Changes in technology and treatment such as minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) and neoadjuvant treatment mandate analysis of more contemporary cohorts.
METHODS: Predictive factors for overall and specific pulmonary morbidity in 858 patients undergoing esophagectomy between 1998 and 2008 in five Australian university hospitals were analyzed by logistic regression models.
RESULTS: A total of 394 patients underwent open esophagectomy, and 464 patients underwent MIE. A total of 259 patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, 139 preoperative chemotherapy alone, and 2 preoperative radiotherapy alone. In-hospital mortality was 3.5%. Smoking and the number of comorbidities were risk factors for overall pulmonary morbidity (odds ratio [OR] 1.47, P = 0.016; OR 1.35, P = 0.001) and pneumonia (OR 2.29, P = 0.002; 1.56, P = 0.005). The risk of respiratory failure was higher in patients with more comorbidities (OR 1.4, P = 0.035). Respiratory comorbidities (OR 3.81, P = 0.017) were strongly predictive of postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). ARDS (4.51, P = 0.032) or respiratory failure (OR 8.7, P < 0.001), but not anastomotic leak (OR 2.22, P = 0.074), were independent risk factors for death. MIE (OR 0.11, P < 0.001) and thoracic epidural analgesia (OR 0.12, P = 0.003) decreased the risk of respiratory failure. Neoadjuvant treatment was not associated with an increased risk of pulmonary complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative comorbidity and smoking were risk factors for respiratory complications, whereas neoadjuvant treatment was not. MIE and the use of thoracic epidural analgesia decreased the risk of respiratory failure. Respiratory failure and ARDS were the only independent factors associated with an increased risk of in-hospital death, whereas anastomotic leakage was not.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21184193     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-010-1474-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  53 in total

1.  Modeling the cost-effectiveness of strategies for treating esophageal adenocarcinoma and high-grade dysplasia.

Authors:  Louisa G Gordon; Nicholas G Hirst; George C Mayne; David I Watson; Timothy Bright; Wang Cai; Andrew P Barbour; Bernard M Smithers; David C Whiteman; Simon Eckermann
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Nationwide analysis of short-term surgical outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy for malignancy.

Authors:  Pragatheeshwar Thirunavukarasu; Emmanuel Gabriel; Kristopher Attwood; Moshim Kukar; Steven N Hochwald; Steven J Nurkin
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 6.071

Review 3.  Pain management within an enhanced recovery program after thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Calvin Thompson; Daniel G French; Ioana Costache
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 4.  Strategies to reduce pulmonary complications after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Teus J Weijs; Jelle P Ruurda; Grard A P Nieuwenhuijzen; Richard van Hillegersberg; Misha D P Luyer
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Airflow Limitation Predicts Postoperative Pneumonia after Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Suguru Maruyama; Akihiko Okamura; Naoki Ishizuka; Yasukazu Kanie; Kei Sakamoto; Daisuke Fujiwara; Jun Kanamori; Yu Imamura; Masayuki Watanabe
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Effectiveness of combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy: comparison of postoperative complications and midterm oncological outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Yousuke Kinjo; Noriaki Kurita; Fumiaki Nakamura; Hiroshi Okabe; Eiji Tanaka; Yoshiki Kataoka; Atsushi Itami; Yoshiharu Sakai; Shunichi Fukuhara
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-09-05       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Circulating Serum Exosomal miRNAs As Potential Biomarkers for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Karen Chiam; Tingting Wang; David I Watson; George C Mayne; Tanya S Irvine; Tim Bright; Lorelle Smith; Imogen A White; Joanne M Bowen; Dorothy Keefe; Sarah K Thompson; Michael E Jones; Damian J Hussey
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  A non-randomized retrospective observational study on the subcutaneous esophageal reconstruction after esophagectomy: is it feasible in high-risk patients?

Authors:  Jae Ho Chung; Sung Ho Lee; Eunjue Yi; Jae Seung Jung; Jung Wook Han; Tae Sik Kim; Ho Sung Son; Kwang Taik Kim
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Management of 1-Lung Ventilation-Variation and Trends in Clinical Practice: A Report From the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group.

Authors:  Douglas A Colquhoun; Bhiken I Naik; Marcel E Durieux; Amy M Shanks; Sachin Kheterpal; S Patrick Bender; Randal S Blank
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 5.108

10.  Impact of pretreatment asymptomatic renal dysfunction on clinical course after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Yuki Kirihataya; Kohei Wakatsuki; Sohei Matsumoto; Hiroshi Nakade; Tomohiro Kunishige; Shintaro Miyao; Masayuki Sho
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 2.549

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.