Literature DB >> 29078538

Minimally invasive esophagectomy and thoraco-abdominal two-field lymph node dissection for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma-antegrade dissection of the thoracic esophagus.

Wentao Fang1, Chunyu Ji1, Jian Feng1, Weigang Zhao1, Xuefei Zhang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive esophagectomy has been gaining increasing interest in management of early stage esophageal cancers. Similar oncological principles including radical removal of the tumor as well as systemic lymph node dissection should be observed, regardless of the surgical approach. Improvement in surgical techniques would help achieve comparable oncological outcomes while help patients benefit from the minimally invasive approach. This video introduces an antegrade dissection which is an alternative to the traditional retrograde esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus.
METHODS: A 54-year-old male patient had a cT1bN0M0 (stage I) squamous cell carcinoma in the middle thoracic esophagus. The surgery selected was thoracoscopic-laparoscopic three-hole esophagectomy with thoraco-abdominal two-field lymph-adenectomy. In the chest part of the procedure, dissection was carried out in an antegrade fashion, from the apex of the chest downwards to the diaphragm. The thoracic esophagus and the tumor was resected en-bloc with surrounding connective tissue. Thorough lymph node dissection was carefully completed, with special attention paid to those along the bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerves.
RESULTS: The patient recovered uneventfully and was discharged on postoperative day 6. Pathologic study revealed a pT1bN1M0 (stage IIb) tumor, with lymphatic involvement detected in a right recurrent nerve node.
CONCLUSIONS: With the help of minimally invasive approach, rapid recovery from the extensive esophagectomy could be expected. However, it is critically important to make sure that the same oncological principles including a radical resection margin and a thorough lymph node dissection should also be observed. For the thoracic part of the procedure, an antegrade dissection could help achieve this goal, while making surgical maneuver simpler and safer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Minimally invasive surgery; esophagectomy; lymphadenectomy

Year:  2016        PMID: 29078538      PMCID: PMC5637465          DOI: 10.21037/jovs.2016.08.09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Surg        ISSN: 2221-2965


  5 in total

Review 1.  Surgical therapy of oesophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  J M Müller; H Erasmi; M Stelzner; U Zieren; H Pichlmaier
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Video-assisted thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy: the experience of Shanghai Chest Hospital.

Authors:  Teng Mao; Wentao Fang; Zhitao Gu; Xufeng Guo; Chunyu Ji; Wenhu Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Surya S A Y Biere; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Kirsten W Maas; Luigi Bonavina; Camiel Rosman; Josep Roig Garcia; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Jean H G Klinkenbijl; Markus W Hollmann; Elly S M de Lange; H Jaap Bonjer; Donald L van der Peet; Miguel A Cuesta
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  En bloc esophagectomy reduces local recurrence and improves survival compared with transhiatal resection after neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  C Rizzetto; S R DeMeester; J A Hagen; C G Peyre; J C Lipham; T R DeMeester
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Comparison of perioperative outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Teng Mao; Wentao Fang; Zhitao Gu; Xufeng Guo; Chunyu Ji; Wenhu Chen
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.500

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.