Zhi Li1, Yu-Ming Sun1, Fei-Xiang Wu1, Li-Qun Yang1, Zhi-Jie Lu1, Wei-Feng Yu1. 1. Zhi Li, Yu-Ming Sun, Fei-Xiang Wu, Li-Qun Yang, Zhi-Jie Lu, Wei-Feng Yu, Department of Anesthesiology, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, the Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200438, China.
Abstract
AIM: To evaluate the effect of low central venous pressure (LCVP) on blood loss and blood transfusion in patients undergoing hepatectomy. METHODS: Electronic databases and bibliography lists were searched for potential articles. A meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating LCVP in hepatectomy was performed. The following three outcomes were analyzed: blood loss, blood transfusion and duration of operation. RESULTS: Five RCTs including 283 patients were assessed. Meta-analysis showed that blood loss in the LCVP group was significantly less than that in the control group (MD = -391.95, 95%CI: -559.35--224.56, P < 0.00001). In addition, blood transfusion in the LCVP group was also significantly less than that in the control group (MD = -246.87, 95%CI: -427.06--66.69, P = 0.007). The duration of operation in the LCVP group was significantly shorter than that in the control group (MD = -18.89, 95%CI: -35.18--2.59, P = 0.02). Most studies found no significant difference in renal and liver function between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Controlled LCVP is a simple and effective technique to reduce blood loss and blood transfusion during liver resection, and appears to have no detrimental effects on liver and renal function.
AIM: To evaluate the effect of low central venous pressure (LCVP) on blood loss and blood transfusion in patients undergoing hepatectomy. METHODS: Electronic databases and bibliography lists were searched for potential articles. A meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating LCVP in hepatectomy was performed. The following three outcomes were analyzed: blood loss, blood transfusion and duration of operation. RESULTS: Five RCTs including 283 patients were assessed. Meta-analysis showed that blood loss in the LCVP group was significantly less than that in the control group (MD = -391.95, 95%CI: -559.35--224.56, P < 0.00001). In addition, blood transfusion in the LCVP group was also significantly less than that in the control group (MD = -246.87, 95%CI: -427.06--66.69, P = 0.007). The duration of operation in the LCVP group was significantly shorter than that in the control group (MD = -18.89, 95%CI: -35.18--2.59, P = 0.02). Most studies found no significant difference in renal and liver function between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Controlled LCVP is a simple and effective technique to reduce blood loss and blood transfusion during liver resection, and appears to have no detrimental effects on liver and renal function.
Entities:
Keywords:
Blood loss; Blood transfusion; Hepatectomy; Low central venous pressure
Authors: G Gozzetti; A Mazziotti; G L Grazi; E Jovine; A Gallucci; S Gruttadauria; A Frena; M Morganti; G Ercolani; M Masetti Journal: Br J Surg Date: 1995-08 Impact factor: 6.939
Authors: J Yamamoto; T Kosuge; T Takayama; K Shimada; S Yamasaki; H Ozaki; N Yamaguchi; S Mizuno; M Makuuchi Journal: Surgery Date: 1994-03 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Emmanuel Melloul; Martin Hübner; Michael Scott; Chris Snowden; James Prentis; Cornelis H C Dejong; O James Garden; Olivier Farges; Norihiro Kokudo; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Pierre-Alain Clavien; Nicolas Demartines Journal: World J Surg Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Camilo Correa-Gallego; Alexandra Berman; Stephanie C Denis; Liana Langdon-Embry; David O'Connor; Vittoria Arslan-Carlon; T Peter Kingham; Michael I D'Angelica; Peter J Allen; Yuman Fong; Ronald P DeMatteo; William R Jarnagin; Jose Melendez; Mary Fischer Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2014-11-11 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Thuy B Tran; David J Worhunsky; David A Spain; Monica M Dua; Brendan C Visser; Jeffrey A Norton; George A Poultsides Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2016-07-21 Impact factor: 3.647