Literature DB >> 30203329

[Central venous pressure in liver surgery : A primary therapeutic goal or a hemodynamic tessera?]

C R Behem1, M F Gräßler2, C J C Trepte2.   

Abstract

Central venous pressure (CVP) is deemed to be an important parameter of anesthesia management in liver surgery. To reduce blood loss during liver resections, a low target value of CVP is often propagated. Although current meta-analyses have shown a connection between low CVP and a reduction in blood loss, the underlying studies show methodological weaknesses and advantages with respect to morbidity and mortality can hardly be proven. The measurement of the CVP itself is associated with numerous limitations and influencing factors and the measures to reduce the CVP have been insufficiently investigated with respect to hepatic hemodynamics. The definition of a generally valid target area for the CVP must be called into question. The primary objective is to maintain adequate oxygen supply and euvolemia. The CVP should be regarded as a mosaic stone of hemodynamic management.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CVP; Hemodynamics; Hepatobiliary surgery; Liver surgery; Monitoring

Year:  2018        PMID: 30203329     DOI: 10.1007/s00101-018-0482-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  61 in total

Review 1.  [Central venous pressure. Validity, informative value and correct measurement].

Authors:  W Schummer
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Stop filling patients against central venous pressure, please!

Authors:  Lars Marius Ytrebø
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  One hundred and fifty hepatic resections: evolution of technique towards bloodless surgery.

Authors:  M Rees; G Plant; J Wells; S Bygrave
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Central venous pressure and its effect on blood loss during liver resection.

Authors:  R M Jones; C E Moulton; K J Hardy
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Thoracic but not lumbar epidural anaesthesia increases liver blood flow after major abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Andreas Kortgen; Malte Silomon; Christine Pape-Becker; Heiko Buchinger; Ulrich Grundmann; Michael Bauer
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Hepatic circulation during surgical stress and anesthesia with halothane, isoflurane, or fentanyl.

Authors:  S Gelman; E Dillard; E L Bradley
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  Positive end-expiratory pressure induces liver congestion in living donor liver transplant patients: myth or fact.

Authors:  Fuat H Saner; Steven W M Olde Damink; Goran Pavlaković; Maartje A J van den Broek; Georgios C Sotiropoulos; Arnold Radtke; Silvio Nadalin; Massimo Malagó; Andreas Paul
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 8.  Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares.

Authors:  Paul E Marik; Michael Baram; Bobbak Vahid
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 9.  Impact of blood loss on outcome after liver resection.

Authors:  Marieke T de Boer; I Quintus Molenaar; Robert J Porte
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2007-07-27       Impact factor: 2.588

10.  Intraoperative fluid management during orthotopic liver transplantation.

Authors:  Rebecca A Schroeder; Bradley H Collins; Elizabeth Tuttle-Newhall; Kerri Robertson; Jeffrey Plotkin; Lynt B Johnson; Paul C Kuo
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.628

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  [Perioperative fluid management in major abdominal surgery].

Authors:  M von der Forst; S Weiterer; M Dietrich; M Loos; C Lichtenstern; M A Weigand; B H Siegler
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.041

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.