Literature DB >> 27500143

Robotic liver surgery: technical aspects and review of the literature.

Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti1, Francesco Maria Bianco1, Despoina Daskalaki1, Luis Fernando Gonzalez-Ciccarelli1, Jihun Kim1, Enrico Benedetti2.   

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery for liver resections has a defined role and represents an accepted alternative to open techniques for selected cases. Robotic technology can overcome some of the disadvantages of the laparoscopic technique, mainly in the most complex cases. Precise dissection and microsuturing is possible, even in narrow operative fields, allowing for a better dissection of the hepatic hilum, fine lymphadenectomy, and biliary reconstruction even with small bile ducts and easier bleeding control. This technique has the potential to allow for a greater number of major resections and difficult segmentectomies to be performed in a minimally invasive fashion. The implementation of near-infrared fluorescence with indocyanine green (ICG) also allows for a more accurate recognition of vascular and biliary anatomy. The perspectives of this kind of virtually implemented imaging are very promising and may be reflected in better outcomes. The overall data present in current literature suggests that robotic liver resections are at least comparable to both open and laparoscopic surgery in terms of perioperative and postoperative outcomes. This article provides technical details of robotic liver resections and a review of the current literature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Robotic liver resection; minimally invasive surgery; robotic hepatectomy

Year:  2016        PMID: 27500143      PMCID: PMC4960413          DOI: 10.21037/hbsn.2015.10.05

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr        ISSN: 2304-3881            Impact factor:   7.293


  46 in total

1.  Robotic liver surgery: results for 70 resections.

Authors:  Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti; Andrea Coratti; Fabio Sbrana; Pietro Addeo; Francesco Maria Bianco; Nicolas Christian Buchs; Mario Annechiarico; Enrico Benedetti
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic and robot-assisted major hepatectomies: an Italian multi-institutional comparative study.

Authors:  Marcello Giuseppe Spampinato; Andrea Coratti; Luigi Bianco; Fabio Caniglia; Andrea Laurenzi; Francesco Puleo; Giuseppe Maria Ettorre; Ugo Boggi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Robot-assisted parenchymal-sparing liver surgery including lesions located in the posterosuperior segments.

Authors:  Luciano Casciola; Alberto Patriti; Graziano Ceccarelli; Alberto Bartoli; Cecilia Ceribelli; Alessandro Spaziani
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Traditional versus robot-assisted full laparoscopic liver resection: a matched-pair comparative study.

Authors:  Hadrien Tranchart; Cecilia Ceribelli; Stefano Ferretti; Ibrahim Dagher; Alberto Patriti
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Evaluation of 300 minimally invasive liver resections at a single institution: less is more.

Authors:  Alan J Koffron; Greg Auffenberg; Robert Kung; Michael Abecassis
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: The Louisville Statement, 2008.

Authors:  Joseph F Buell; Daniel Cherqui; David A Geller; Nicholas O'Rourke; David Iannitti; Ibrahim Dagher; Alan J Koffron; Mark Thomas; Brice Gayet; Ho Seong Han; Go Wakabayashi; Giulio Belli; Hironori Kaneko; Chen-Guo Ker; Olivier Scatton; Alexis Laurent; Eddie K Abdalla; Prosanto Chaudhury; Erik Dutson; Clark Gamblin; Michael D'Angelica; David Nagorney; Giuliano Testa; Daniel Labow; Derrik Manas; Ronnie T Poon; Heidi Nelson; Robert Martin; Bryan Clary; Wright C Pinson; John Martinie; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Robert Goldstein; Sasan Roayaie; David Barlet; Joseph Espat; Michael Abecassis; Myrddin Rees; Yuman Fong; Kelly M McMasters; Christoph Broelsch; Ron Busuttil; Jacques Belghiti; Steven Strasberg; Ravi S Chari
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients.

Authors:  Kevin Tri Nguyen; T Clark Gamblin; David A Geller
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Robotic-assisted minimally invasive liver resection.

Authors:  Yao-Ming Wu; Rey-Heng Hu; Hong-Shiee Lai; Po-Huang Lee
Journal:  Asian J Surg       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 2.767

9.  Comparing the clinical and economic impact of laparoscopic versus open liver resection.

Authors:  Tsafrir Vanounou; Jennifer L Steel; Kevin Tri Nguyen; Allan Tsung; J Wallis Marsh; David A Geller; T Clark Gamblin
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 10.  The safety and efficacy of approaches to liver resection: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nicole R Jackson; Adam Hauch; Tian Hu; Joseph F Buell; Douglas P Slakey; Emad Kandil
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  22 in total

1.  The Application of Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging During Robotic Liver Resection: A Case-Matched Study.

Authors:  Marco Vito Marino; Salomone Di Saverio; Mauro Podda; Marcos Gomez Ruiz; Manuel Gomez Fleitas
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Robotic-Assisted Versus Laparoscopic Left Lateral Sectionectomy: Analysis of Surgical Outcomes and Costs by a Propensity Score Matched Cohort Study.

Authors:  Chady Salloum; Chetana Lim; Eylon Lahat; Concepcion Gomez I Gavara; Eric Levesque; Philippe Compagnon; Daniel Azoulay
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Robot-Assisted Transplant Surgery - Vision or Reality? A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Philipp Stiegler; Peter Schemmer
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2018-02-07

4.  Use of robotics in liver donor right hepatectomy.

Authors:  Fabrizio Panaro; Giuliano Testa
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 7.293

5.  Fully robotic left hepatectomy for malignant tumor: technique and initial results.

Authors:  Marco Vito Marino; Gaspare Gulotta; Andrzej Lech Komorowski
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2018-07-06

6.  A Technique to Define Extrahepatic Biliary Anatomy Using Robotic Near-Infrared Fluorescent Cholangiography.

Authors:  Ajay V Maker; Nicholas Kunda
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: application of the difficulty scoring system.

Authors:  Charing C N Chong; H T Lok; Andrew K Y Fung; Anthony K W Fong; Y S Cheung; John Wong; K F Lee; Paul B S Lai
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  The Role of ICG in Robot-Assisted Liver Resections.

Authors:  Anne-Sophie Mehdorn; Florian Richter; Katharina Hess; Jan Henrik Beckmann; Jan-Hendrik Egberts; Michael Linecker; Thomas Becker; Felix Braun
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-19       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 9.  Review of the Standard and Advanced Screening, Staging Systems and Treatment Modalities for Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Siaw Shi Boon; Ho Yin Luk; Chuanyun Xiao; Zigui Chen; Paul Kay Sheung Chan
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 6.575

10.  National Trends and Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic-assisted Hepatectomy in the USA: A Propensity-score Matched Analysis from the National Cancer Database.

Authors:  Mohamed K Kamel; Faiz Tuma; Charles A Keane; John Blebea
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.