Literature DB >> 27510178

Identifying the position of the right atrium to align pressure transducer for CVP : Spirit level or 3D electromagnetic positioning?

S Avellan1, I Uhr1, D McKelvey2, Soren Sondergaard3.   

Abstract

The central venous pressure, CVP, is an important variable in the management of selected perioperative and intensive care cases and in clinical decision support systems, CDSS. In current routine, when measuring CVP the health care provider may use anatomical landmarks and a spirit level, SL, to adjust the pressure transducer to the level of the tricuspid valve, i.e. the phlebostatic axis. The aim of the study was to assess the agreement in the postoperative setting between the SL method and electromagnetic 3D positioning (EM). CVP was measured with patients in positions dictated by nursing routines. The staff members measured CVP using SL to position the transducer at the perceived phlebostatic level. This position was compared to coordinates based on an electromagnetic field with external sensors at anatomical landmarks and an internal sensor in the CV catheter for 3D determination of the phlebostatic axis. An electronic survey took bearing on the accepted error in measurement among colleagues at the department. There was a clinically relevant difference between the CVP measured by the staff members and the CVP based on the 3D EM positioning. The limits of agreement extended in excess of ±8 mmHg and half of the measurements had deviations outside an accepted error range of ±2.5 mmHg. There was a large variation in CVP measurements when assessing the agreement with the current method. This may indicate the need for improvement in accuracy, e.g. using the electromagnetic field positioning system, in association with routine monitoring and clinical decision support systems.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Central venous pressure; Diagnostic use; Electromagnetic field; Instrumentation; Methods physiology

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27510178     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-016-9918-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  22 in total

Review 1.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Accuracy of electromagnetic tracking with a prototype field generator in an interventional OR setting.

Authors:  Lars Eirik Bø; Håkon Olav Leira; Geir Arne Tangen; Erlend Fagertun Hofstad; Tore Amundsen; Thomas Langø
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  How to use central venous pressure measurements.

Authors:  Sheldon Magder
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.687

4.  Volume state control - a new approach.

Authors:  W G Parkin
Journal:  Crit Care Resusc       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.159

5.  Therapeutic control of the circulation.

Authors:  William Geoffrey Parkin; Mark Stephen Leaning
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 2.502

6.  Venous pressure measurement. I. Choice of zero level.

Authors:  A PEDERSEN; J HUSBY
Journal:  Acta Med Scand       Date:  1951-12-12

7.  Minimal clinically important difference: a novel approach to measure changes in outcome in perioperative medicine.

Authors:  Bernhard Walder; Julien Maillard; Anne Lübbeke
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Improvements in the application and reporting of advanced Bland-Altman methods of comparison.

Authors:  Erik Olofsen; Albert Dahan; Gerard Borsboom; Gordon Drummond
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 9.  Hemodynamic monitoring in the mechanically ventilated patient.

Authors:  Sheldon Magder
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.687

10.  Association between systemic hemodynamics and septic acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Matthieu Legrand; Claire Dupuis; Christelle Simon; Etienne Gayat; Joaquim Mateo; Anne-Claire Lukaszewicz; Didier Payen
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2017 end of year summary: cardiovascular and hemodynamic monitoring.

Authors:  Bernd Saugel; Karim Bendjelid; Lester A H Critchley; Thomas W L Scheeren
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Two-stage goal-directed therapy protocol for non-donor open hepatectomy: an interventional before-after study.

Authors:  Kazuyuki Mizunoya; Tomoaki Fujii; Masataka Yamamoto; Nobuhiro Tanaka; Yuji Morimoto
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 2.078

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.