Literature DB >> 24411646

Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research regulation and management.

Rustam Al-Shahi Salman1, Elaine Beller2, Jonathan Kagan3, Elina Hemminki4, Robert S Phillips5, Julian Savulescu6, Malcolm Macleod7, Janet Wisely8, Iain Chalmers9.   

Abstract

After identification of an important research question and selection of an appropriate study design, waste can arise from the regulation, governance, and management of biomedical research. Obtaining regulatory and governance approval has become increasingly burdensome and disproportionate to the conceivable risks to research participants. Regulation and governance involve interventions that are assumed to be justified in the interests of patients and the public, but they can actually compromise these interests. Inefficient management of the procedural conduct of research is wasteful, especially if it results in poor recruitment and retention of participants in well designed studies addressing important questions. These sources of waste can be minimised if the following four recommendations are addressed. First, regulators should use their influence to reduce other causes of waste and inefficiency in research. Second, regulators and policy makers should work with researchers, patients, and health professionals to streamline and harmonise the laws, regulations, guidelines, and processes that govern whether and how research can be done, and ensure that they are proportionate to the plausible risks associated with the research. Third, researchers and research managers should increase the efficiency of recruitment, retention, data monitoring, and data sharing in research through use of research designs known to reduce inefficiencies, and further research should be done to learn how efficiency can be increased. Finally, everyone, particularly those responsible for health-care systems, should promote integration of research into everyday clinical practice. Regulators and researchers should monitor adherence to each of these recommendations and publish metrics.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24411646      PMCID: PMC3952153          DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62297-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  85 in total

1.  A risk adapted approach to the governance of clinical trials.

Authors:  Rosalind L Smyth
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-10-25

2.  Need for a wider view of autonomy in epidemiological research.

Authors:  Mats G Hansson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-05-05

3.  Does the European clinical trials directive really improve clinical trial approval time?

Authors:  Hiddo J Lambers Heerspink; Daniela Dobre; Hans L Hillege; Diederick E Grobbee; Dick de Zeeuw
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Health Research Authority's great leap forward on UK trial registration.

Authors:  Iain Chalmers
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-09-25

5.  A proposal to protect privacy of health information while accelerating comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Douglas Peddicord; Ann B Waldo; Marc Boutin; Tina Grande; Luis Gutierrez
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 6.  A systematic search for reports of site monitoring technique comparisons in clinical trials.

Authors:  Julie Bakobaki; Nicola Joffe; Sarah Burdett; Jayne Tierney; Sarah Meredith; Sally Stenning
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 2.486

7.  Better outcomes for patients treated at hospitals that participate in clinical trials.

Authors:  Sumit R Majumdar; Matthew T Roe; Eric D Peterson; Anita Y Chen; W Brian Gibler; Paul W Armstrong
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2008-03-24

Review 8.  Progress in childhood cancer: 50 years of research collaboration, a report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Maura O'Leary; Mark Krailo; James R Anderson; Gregory H Reaman
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 9.  Research governance: regulating risk and reducing harm?

Authors:  Sara Shaw; Geraldine Barrett
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 18.000

10.  The value of source data verification in a cancer clinical trial.

Authors:  Catrin Tudur Smith; Deborah D Stocken; Janet Dunn; Trevor Cox; Paula Ghaneh; David Cunningham; John P Neoptolemos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  143 in total

1.  Increasing disparities between resource inputs and outcomes, as measured by certain health deliverables, in biomedical research.

Authors:  Anthony Bowen; Arturo Casadevall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Otology Jubilee: 150 years of the Archiv für Ohrenheilkunde "Where do we come from?--Where are we?--Where are we going?".

Authors:  Stefan K Plontke
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Assessment Fidelity in Aphasia Research.

Authors:  Jessica D Richardson; Sarah Grace Hudspeth Dalton; Jennifer Shafer; Janet Patterson
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.408

4.  Radix Sophorae flavescentis versus no intervention or placebo for chronic hepatitis B.

Authors:  Ning Liang; De Zhao Kong; Si Si Ma; Chun Li Lu; Ming Yang; Lu Da Feng; Chen Shen; Ruo Han Diao; Ling Jun Cui; Xing Yu Lu; Dimitrinka Nikolova; Janus C Jakobsen; Christian Gluud; Jian Ping Liu
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-04-03

Review 5.  Comparison of central adjudication of outcomes and onsite outcome assessment on treatment effect estimates.

Authors:  Lee Aymar Ndounga Diakou; Ludovic Trinquart; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Caroline Barnes; Amelie Yavchitz; Philippe Ravaud; Isabelle Boutron
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-03-10

6.  Explanation and Elaboration Document for the STROBE-Vet Statement: Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology-Veterinary Extension.

Authors:  A M O'Connor; J M Sargeant; I R Dohoo; H N Erb; M Cevallos; M Egger; A K Ersbøll; S W Martin; L R Nielsen; D L Pearl; D U Pfeiffer; J Sanchez; M E Torrence; H Vigre; C Waldner; M P Ward
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 3.333

7.  The MICHR Genomic DNA BioLibrary: An Empirical Study of the Ethics of Biorepository Development.

Authors:  Blake J Roessler; Nicholas H Steneck; Lisa Connally
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 8.  Standardization of Small Animal Imaging-Current Status and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Julia G Mannheim; Firat Kara; Janine Doorduin; Kerstin Fuchs; Gerald Reischl; Sayuan Liang; Marleen Verhoye; Felix Gremse; Laura Mezzanotte; Marc C Huisman
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.488

9.  Is Biomedical Research Protected from Predatory Reviewers?

Authors:  Aceil Al-Khatib; Jaime A Teixeira da Silva
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 3.525

10.  Different corticosteroid induction regimens in children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: the SIRJIA mixed-methods feasibility study.

Authors:  Ashley P Jones; Dannii Clayton; Gloria Nkhoma; Frances C Sherratt; Matthew Peak; Simon R Stones; Louise Roper; Bridget Young; Flora McErlane; Tracy Moitt; Athimalaipet V Ramanan; Helen E Foster; Paula R Williamson; Samundeeswari Deepak; Michael W Beresford; Eileen M Baildam
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 4.014

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.