Literature DB >> 21041752

A proposal to protect privacy of health information while accelerating comparative effectiveness research.

Douglas Peddicord1, Ann B Waldo, Marc Boutin, Tina Grande, Luis Gutierrez.   

Abstract

Current laws, practices, and concerns about privacy inhibit access to health data for research. Barriers include inconsistent Institutional Review Board policies and complicated and costly procedures to obtain the consent of patients for release of their information. To realize the promise of comparative effectiveness research, it is essential to develop a new policy framework that will allow and encourage the use of health information in all forms--fully identifiable, partially anonymized, and deidentified. We propose that health data be made available for information-based research under a so-called research safe harbor. The arrangement would include strict data security controls, standards, and practices to be promulgated by the secretary of health and human services, and an annual third-party audit to ensure compliance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21041752     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0635

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  9 in total

1.  Benefits and Risks in Secondary Use of Digitized Clinical Data: Views of Community Members Living in a Predominantly Ethnic Minority Urban Neighborhood.

Authors:  Robert J Lucero; Joan Kearney; Yamnia Cortes; Adriana Arcia; Paul Appelbaum; Roberto Lewis Fernández; Jose Luchsinger
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2015

2.  Automated Facial Recognition of Computed Tomography-Derived Facial Images: Patient Privacy Implications.

Authors:  Connie L Parks; Keith L Monson
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 3.  Neuroinflammation - using big data to inform clinical practice.

Authors:  Calliope A Dendrou; Gil McVean; Lars Fugger
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 42.937

4.  Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research regulation and management.

Authors:  Rustam Al-Shahi Salman; Elaine Beller; Jonathan Kagan; Elina Hemminki; Robert S Phillips; Julian Savulescu; Malcolm Macleod; Janet Wisely; Iain Chalmers
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Scalable Architecture for Federated Translational Inquiries Network (SAFTINet) Technology Infrastructure for a Distributed Data Network.

Authors:  Lisa M Schilling; Bethany M Kwan; Charles T Drolshagen; Patrick W Hosokawa; Elias Brandt; Wilson D Pace; Christopher Uhrich; Michael Kamerick; Aidan Bunting; Philip R O Payne; William E Stephens; Joseph M George; Mark Vance; Kelli Giacomini; Jason Braddy; Mika K Green; Michael G Kahn
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2013-10-07

6.  Kenyan health stakeholder views on individual consent, general notification and governance processes for the re-use of hospital inpatient data to support learning on healthcare systems.

Authors:  Daniel Mbuthia; Sassy Molyneux; Maureen Njue; Salim Mwalukore; Vicki Marsh
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 2.652

7.  Electronic health records and clinician burnout: A story of three eras.

Authors:  Kevin B Johnson; Michael J Neuss; Don Eugene Detmer
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  An ethics safe harbor for international genomics research?

Authors:  Edward S Dove; Bartha M Knoppers; Ma'n H Zawati
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 11.117

9.  Ethics Issues Arising in the Transition to Learning Health Care Systems: Results from Interviews with Leaders from 25 Health Systems.

Authors:  Stephanie R Morain; Nancy E Kass
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2016-03-29
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.